Earlier this month, Clallam County officially signed a contract with Nesterly, a nationally recognized home sharing platform, clearing the way for their service to launch locally. This marks an important step toward adding a practical, near-term tool to our community’s affordable housing toolbox.

As many readers will remember from last year’s guest article by Nancy Stephanz, home sharing is not a silver bullet for our housing shortage. But it is a thoughtful, human-scale solution that can help right now. It connects people who have extra space in their homes with people who need a safe, affordable place to live, while providing structure, background checks, contracts, and ongoing support to both parties.

Home sharing has been particularly effective in other communities for:

• Older adults who want to age in place but could use extra income or companionship

• Students, seasonal workers, and early-career professionals struggling to find rentals

• Employers and institutions facing workforce housing shortages

• Homeowners with unused bedrooms or ADUs who want a responsible, supported way to rent

Importantly, every successful home share can also ease pressure elsewhere in the housing market by freeing up traditional rental units for families and long-term tenants.

With the contract now signed, Nesterly expects to begin onboarding Clallam County hosts in early February. To kick things off, they are hosting an open, public webinar tomorrow (Monday, Jan 26th) where anyone can learn how the program works and ask questions directly.

Nesterly Homesharing Information Session
Monday, January 26
3:00 PM CST (1:00 PM Pacific)
Open to potential hosts, renters, community members, and partners
RSVP Here

This session is designed for people who are simply curious, as well as those seriously considering participating. There is no commitment required. It is an opportunity to understand the process, the safeguards, and whether home sharing might be a good fit for your situation.

Nancy Stephanz will also be continuing her local outreach in February with step-by-step presentations to help people navigate the sign-up process and think through hosting thoughtfully and safely. If you are part of a community group, faith organization, or civic group that might benefit from a presentation, those conversations are just getting started.

Affordable housing challenges were not created overnight, and they will not be solved by a single idea. But progress happens when we stack practical solutions together, especially ones that build connection while meeting real needs.

If you have ever wondered whether home sharing could work for you, this webinar is a great place to start.

More updates soon.

In early 2025, I learned that I had been named a finalist for the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year award. I was grateful for the nomination, but my first response was not pride. It was discomfort.

There are many people in our community doing extraordinary work, often quietly and without recognition. Being mentioned alongside past recipients and fellow nominees who have made such meaningful contributions left me feeling humbled and unsure that I truly belonged in that company.

I did not expect to win. When the night of the Chamber gala arrived and my name was announced, the emotions came quickly. Gratitude, surprise, appreciation, and a persistent feeling that the honor belonged to others as much as it did to me.

In the days that followed, I spent time reflecting on why the recognition felt so uncomfortable. I eventually came to realize that the question was not whether I deserved the honor, but what responsibility came with it. Recognition, when received honestly, is not an endpoint. It is a prompt.

That prompt became a simple but demanding question: How could I do more.

I had spent years participating in boardrooms, public meetings, and online discussions. I had seen firsthand how quickly conversations could turn adversarial, how often nuance was lost, and how rare it was to find spaces focused on understanding rather than winning. At the same time, I had also seen dedicated people working hard to improve our community, often without visibility or acknowledgment.

Clallam County Solutions grew out of that contrast. The platform was created as a place to slow the conversation down, examine complex issues with care, and highlight the people and ideas working toward practical solutions. It was never meant to be about a single voice or a single perspective. It was meant to invite thoughtful dialogue and shared responsibility.

Looking back, 2025 was not a year of conclusions or answers. It was the year an idea became a commitment, and a commitment became a conversation.

Free to Read, Supported by Choice

The question of responsibility did not stop with the decision to launch Clallam County Solutions. It also shaped how the platform would operate.

From the beginning, I made a clear commitment that every article would be free to read. This was not intended to be a paywalled publication or a revenue-driven venture. The goal was to create a space where anyone in our community could engage with ideas, context, and thoughtful analysis without barriers.

At the same time, I chose to offer readers the option to support the work financially if they found value in it. That choice came with a second commitment. Fifty percent of any proceeds would be donated back into the community through local nonprofit organizations. If readers chose to support this platform, that support would circulate outward rather than accumulate inward.

I approached this model with very modest expectations. Long-form, solutions-focused writing already asks more of readers than a quick headline or social media post. Offering it for free while inviting optional support felt like an experiment rooted more in trust than in strategy. I was prepared for the possibility that no one would contribute at all.

What mattered most was staying aligned with the purpose of the platform. Accessibility, transparency, and community benefit were not secondary considerations. They were foundational choices meant to reflect the same values the writing itself aims to promote.

What the Response Made Possible

By the end of 2025, Clallam County Solutions articles had been viewed 11,631 times.

That number matters less as a measure of reach and more as a reflection of engagement. Each view represents time given by someone in our community to consider complex local issues and participate, even quietly, in a deeper conversation.

Alongside that readership, optional financial support totaled $1,068 over the course of the year. Every contribution was voluntary and offered in support of work that was already freely available. That level of trust is something I hold with great care.

From the beginning, I committed to returning half of any proceeds directly back into the community. In 2025, that commitment results in a $534 donation.

I am honored to direct this contribution to 4PA in recognition of the work they are doing and the long-term impact they continue to pursue in our community. Their efforts reflect the values this platform seeks to elevate. Practical problem-solving, collaboration, and a willingness to engage with complex challenges thoughtfully and compassionately.

This donation exists because readers chose to support thoughtful local journalism. Each subscription and contribution helped turn shared understanding into tangible support for an organization doing meaningful work on the ground.

Taken together, these responses point to something encouraging. People in our community are hungry for solutions, honest discussion, and opportunities to be part of making Clallam County better. When a community invests in understanding, that investment can extend beyond conversation and into real action.

The Conversations That Took Shape

The articles published in 2025 were not written in isolation. Together, they form a broader conversation about how Clallam County works, where it struggles, and where opportunity exists if we are willing to engage thoughtfully.

Several recurring themes emerged over the course of the year.

Housing and Affordability
A number of articles focused on housing, including the role of Habitat for Humanity, common misconceptions around funding and operations, and the real costs and constraints of building homes in a rural community. These discussions explored how housing stability affects families, workforce participation, and long-term community health.

Homelessness
Rather than offering quick conclusions, the homelessness series examined root causes, system limitations, and the human realities behind the issue. The emphasis was on understanding complexity, acknowledging tradeoffs, and resisting the temptation of simple answers to deeply layered challenges.

Civic Process and Local Decision-Making
Several pieces sought to explain how local governance functions in practice, from planning processes to regulatory boundaries. The goal was to provide context, reduce mistrust, and clarify why many decisions involve balancing competing priorities rather than choosing between right and wrong.

Economic Development and Workforce
Articles addressing workforce development and economic growth highlighted the interconnected nature of jobs, housing, and opportunity. These conversations emphasized the importance of long-term thinking, cross-sector collaboration, and investments that strengthen the community as a whole.

Community Trust and Public Dialogue
Some writing focused on how we talk to one another, particularly in online spaces. These articles addressed misinformation, public criticism, and the challenge of maintaining respectful dialogue while still engaging honestly with disagreement.

Across all of these topics, the intent remained consistent. To prioritize substance over outrage, context over assumptions, and collaboration over division.

Carrying the Work Forward

As I look toward 2026, I feel a renewed sense of purpose rather than a sense of completion.

There is still important work ahead, particularly in bringing the homelessness series to a thoughtful and responsible conclusion. These are conversations that deserve care, patience, and follow-through. Rushing to wrap them up would undermine the very principles that guided their beginning.

Beyond that series, several other topics are already taking shape. Some will build on familiar themes like housing, workforce development, and civic responsibility. Others will explore emerging issues as our community continues to change. Not every idea will become an article right away, and that restraint is intentional.

Balancing this work alongside family, career, and other commitments has reinforced an important discipline. This platform is at its best when each article is given the time and focus it deserves. I would rather publish fewer pieces that are thoughtful, accurate, and genuinely useful than chase volume for its own sake.

Looking ahead, my commitment remains steady. To ask better questions, to listen carefully, and to continue creating space for dialogue that helps move our community forward.

Lowering the Barrier, Preserving the Depth

One of the lessons from 2025 is that while long-form journalism resonates deeply with many readers, time and attention are limited resources. Interest does not always align with availability.

To make this work more accessible, I will be introducing TL;DR versions of select articles (“too long; didn’t read”). These summaries will offer a concise overview of key ideas, essential context, and central questions explored in the full pieces. They are designed to help readers engage with the work in a way that fits their schedule.

Long-form journalism will remain the foundation of Clallam County Solutions. Depth, nuance, and careful analysis are not being replaced. The TL;DR versions are meant to serve as an entry point, whether that means a brief read on its own or an invitation to explore a full article later.

The goal is simple. To make thoughtful dialogue easier to enter without compromising the substance that gives it value.

Gratitude and the Road Ahead

Above all else, I want to express my sincere gratitude.

Thank you to the readers who spent time with these articles, whether you read one piece or followed the platform throughout the year. Thank you to those who asked thoughtful questions, shared feedback, and engaged respectfully, even when perspectives differed. Thank you to those who provided guest articles or contributed their time and thoughts to other articles. And thank you to everyone who chose to support this work financially, not because it was required, but because you believed it had value.

I am also deeply appreciative of the individuals and organizations working every day to strengthen our community. Much of this work happens quietly and without recognition. Volunteers, nonprofit staff, board members, educators, and neighbors who step forward when something needs doing are the true backbone of Clallam County.

Clallam County Solutions exists to highlight those efforts, to learn from them, and to encourage more people to engage in ways that feel meaningful and sustainable. Progress is rarely the result of a single idea or voice. It grows from people showing up, listening, and choosing to work together.

I look forward to continuing this journey with you. There is more to explore, more to understand, and more opportunities to turn thoughtful dialogue into positive action. I am grateful to be part of a community willing to do that work together.

A Community Searching for Steady Ground

Public life today feels louder than ever, yet somehow less clear. Conversations about national politics are tense, and even local issues can split neighbors who share many of the same hopes for this place we call home. Many of us sense that something important has shifted. The extremes seem to speak the loudest, while the thoughtful middle, where real solutions tend to emerge, is harder to find.

In moments like this, a simple question rises to the surface: how do we lead and solve problems when everything around us feels pulled toward opposite poles?

There is an ancient idea that offers surprising clarity. Aristotle described it as the Golden Mean, the belief that virtue exists in balance rather than in extremes. A modern illustration of this framework shows how each virtue sits between two distortions: one of deficiency and one of excess. It is a reminder that durable, practical answers almost never sit at the edges.

Seen through this perspective, the challenges we face—national division, strained local dialogue, and the complex issues shaping daily life in Clallam County—come into sharper focus. The Golden Mean offers a way to understand the forces pulling us apart and a guide for approaching issues like homelessness, growth, environmental stewardship, and long-term budgeting with clarity and balance.

If we want a healthier civic culture, we need more than arguments and more than slogans. We need a shared commitment to bringing our decisions back toward balance, where problem-solving, trust, and progress have a chance to grow. This is an invitation to explore what that could look like here at home.

Understanding the Virtue Continuum: A Framework for Modern Leadership

The Golden Mean offers a way to think about leadership and decision-making that feels especially relevant today. Aristotle taught that every virtue sits between two unhealthy opposites. One reflects too little of a quality we need. The other reflects too much. The balanced middle is not a compromise. It is the strongest and most constructive expression of that quality.

This graphic visualizes these continuums. Each set includes a deficiency on the left, a virtue in the center, and an excess on the right. Once we understand how these relationships work, we begin to see why extremes so often fail us and why thoughtful leadership requires holding tension rather than collapsing into simplicity.

Consider integrity, which rests between corruption and legalism.
Corruption abandons principle and undermines trust. Legalism, by contrast, becomes so rigid that it forgets context, compassion, and fairness. Integrity occupies the center, holding to core values while recognizing that real-life decisions demand judgment rather than simple rule-following.

Discernment follows a similar pattern.
On one side is foolishness, the failure to take information, risk, or consequence seriously. On the other is judgementalism, a swift and harsh certainty that shuts out understanding. Discernment listens, evaluates, and seeks truth without rushing to either naive acceptance or condemnation.

Love may seem like a personal virtue, but it has civic relevance as well.
Selfishness focuses only on personal comfort or fear. Enablement removes all expectations in the name of compassion. Love holds both dignity and accountability at once, which is especially important in conversations about homelessness, social services, and safety.

Temperance provides another useful lens.
Debauchery reflects a lack of restraint. Strictness swings too far in the opposite direction, sacrificing flexibility. Temperance encourages thoughtful limits while still allowing room for creativity and adaptation. It helps communities evaluate how much regulation is needed without drifting into overreach or neglect.

Finally, courage shows why balance is often the hardest place to stand.
Cowardice avoids necessary action. Foolhardiness ignores risk and reflection. Courage acknowledges the difficulty but chooses purposeful action. In civic life, it often takes courage to hold a balanced position when extremes on both sides insist on total alignment.

Together, these examples reveal an important truth. Extremes are easy. They offer emotional certainty and simple narratives. The balanced center requires more from us. It asks us to recognize nuance, consider competing values, and choose actions that support long-term community wellbeing rather than chase quick wins.

The Golden Mean does not call for timidity. It calls for wisdom. In leadership and civic life, this middle space is where trust is built, where collaboration becomes possible, and where practical solutions begin to take shape.

With this understanding in place, the patterns of our national political climate come into sharper focus. The same distortions that shift virtues off balance often drive the divisions we experience locally as well.

The Cost of Extremes in Today’s Political Climate

If the Golden Mean teaches that virtue lives between deficiency and excess, much of our modern political culture pushes us toward the edges instead. Public life increasingly rewards absolute certainty, quick judgments, and simplified narratives that divide issues into two incompatible camps. In this environment, nuance can feel suspect and moderation is often mistaken for weakness.

National politics illustrates this tendency clearly. Complex challenges are reduced to slogans. Voters are encouraged to choose between sharply opposed positions, even though most people hold a blend of values that do not fit neatly into a single category. Leaders face pressure to offer definitive answers rather than thoughtful ones, and the loudest voices often overshadow the most constructive.

Although these patterns originate nationally, they inevitably filter into local life. Conversations about zoning, homelessness, housing density, or city budgeting sometimes borrow assumptions from national debates, even when local issues depend on entirely different facts. Instead of wrestling with the practical realities of Clallam County, discussions can drift into familiar ideological grooves that do little to move solutions forward.

The cost of this is significant. Collaboration becomes harder. Public meetings grow tense. Leaders may feel pressure to signal loyalty to one side rather than pursue decisions shaped by local context. And residents who hold thoughtful or mixed views may slowly withdraw, believing there is no real space for nuance.

This is where the Golden Mean becomes more than a philosophical framework. It becomes a lens for understanding how our civic life drifts off balance. Each of the virtues described earlier has a distorted form that shows up in today’s politics. Integrity falters when we swing between rigid rule enforcement and dismissing rules altogether. Discernment weakens when assumptions replace understanding. Compassion becomes harder to practice when the only options offered are self-protection or boundary-free permissiveness. Temperance is strained by a culture that amplifies volatility. Courage becomes more difficult when thoughtful positions are attacked from multiple sides.

Recognizing these patterns matters because local communities are not powerless. We can choose a different civic culture. We can reward leaders who take time to understand context, who communicate openly, and who do not confuse volume with effectiveness. We can make room for disagreement without hostility.

As we turn toward the real challenges facing Clallam County, this mindset becomes essential. Homelessness, housing, environmental protection, infrastructure, and fiscal responsibility are not problems that yield to extremes. They require the steady approach that balances competing needs and works toward long-term wellbeing.

The path forward is not found at either pole. It takes shape in the thoughtful middle, where people commit to understanding one another and building solutions together. With that perspective, our local challenges come into clearer focus.

Applying the Golden Mean to Local Challenges in Clallam County

The Golden Mean becomes most powerful when we apply it to the situations that affect people’s daily lives. Clallam County faces challenges that influence everything from housing stability to environmental health to long-term economic vitality. These issues rarely fit into tidy ideological categories. They involve competing values, limited resources, and the ongoing task of balancing individual needs with community wellbeing.

When tensions rise, public debate often drifts toward the extremes: one side pushing too little of a needed value, the other pushing too much. Real progress begins when we step back from those poles and take the wider picture into account.

We can see this clearly across several of our most important local conversations.

Homelessness: Between Enablement and Punishment
Public discussion around homelessness often settles into two predictable camps. One emphasizes compassion so heavily that expectations and accountability fade. The other prioritizes order and safety to such a degree that people experiencing homelessness are treated mostly as problems to remove rather than individuals trying to regain stability.

Both viewpoints contain something true. People need access to services, and communities need public safety. But neither extreme produces meaningful improvement. Approaches rooted only in compassion can unintentionally sustain harmful cycles. Approaches rooted only in enforcement often overlook root causes and make it harder for people to access the help they need.

Balanced communities take a different approach. They ensure that services exist but pair them with clear expectations and pathways forward. They insist that public safety and human dignity are not competing values. They recognize that long-term progress comes from combining support with responsibility. This middle-ground model is not designed to satisfy ideology. It is designed to produce real outcomes.

Housing and Environmental Stewardship: Between Stagnation and Overreach
Clallam County is defined by its natural beauty, yet shaped by the urgent need for more attainable housing. These are two deeply held community priorities, and too often the debate frames them as mutually exclusive.

On one end is the instinct to restrict development so heavily that growth becomes nearly impossible. On the other is the push to build quickly and expansively, risking strain on infrastructure and sensitive ecosystems. Each reflects legitimate concerns. Each, taken too far, carries real consequences: stagnation on one side, overreach on the other.

Balanced leadership recognizes that environmental stewardship and housing availability must work together. When applied thoughtfully, tools like thoughtful zoning, strategic density, infill development, modern environmental standards, and long-range planning can complement one another rather than collide. Communities that plan well can grow responsibly and preserve what makes this region special.

Finding this balance requires the courage to look beyond slogans and examine real data, as well as examples from similar communities. Sustainable growth is not about choosing one value over another. It is about integrating multiple values in ways that strengthen families, employers, and ecosystems.

Fiscal Responsibility: Between Austerity and Excess
Budget discussions reveal how difficult it is to balance community expectations with economic realities. Residents want dependable roads, strong emergency services, maintained utilities, and safe public spaces. These are foundational needs.

At the same time, many households feel the pressure of rising costs. Taxes, utilities, and fees accumulate quickly, especially for those already struggling. When local governments ask more of their citizens financially, they carry a responsibility to provide more in return: clearer communication, greater transparency, and disciplined stewardship. Investments must be justified not only in numbers but in outcomes.

Here again, extremes fall short. Deep cuts may offer short-term relief but undermine long-term health and stability. Broad expansions of spending may address immediate needs but can create structural risks and erode public trust.

Balanced fiscal stewardship recognizes that strong communities require strategic investment, but it insists that those investments be smart, prioritized, and measurable. It asks leaders to articulate why certain expenditures matter and how they serve long-term goals. This approach is not partisan. It is practical.

Across these examples, the pattern is clear. Extremes offer clarity but not solutions. They can simplify debate while distorting reality. The Golden Mean invites a different posture: one that acknowledges competing values, weighs trade-offs honestly, and builds decisions that strengthen the entire community.

Clallam County does not need to choose between compassion or accountability, growth or preservation, or investment or restraint. What it needs is the steady middle ground where trust grows, progress takes shape, and long-term wellbeing becomes possible.

Leading and Building Together on the Middle Path

Balanced leadership is not an abstract ideal. It shows up in the decisions leaders make every day and in the way communities respond to one another in moments of tension or change. When people choose balance over extremes, they create space for clarity, collaboration, and long-term progress. The Golden Mean becomes not just a philosophical framework, but a practical guide for civic life in Clallam County.

We are at a moment that calls for this approach. Economic pressures, housing shortages, infrastructure needs, behavioral health challenges, and the rising cost of living all place real demands on local systems. National political polarization adds another layer of difficulty, often pulling local conversations into unproductive patterns borrowed from elsewhere. Leadership rooted in extremes may generate attention, but it rarely produces durable solutions. What our community needs is steadiness: the capacity to navigate competing priorities without collapsing into oversimplified answers.

Balanced leadership begins with integrity and clear communication. It means being transparent about decisions, the reasoning behind them, and the long-term goals they serve. In a small community where trust is both essential and fragile, this kind of openness forms the foundation of effective public life.

It also requires discernment. Local issues are rarely simple, and leaders must be willing to understand problems in their full context rather than rely on ideological shortcuts. This includes listening to residents with different experiences, weighing evidence carefully, and recognizing that people can disagree in good faith while still caring deeply about the community.

Compassion adds another dimension. Policy choices affect real people, and acknowledging that human impact matters. But compassion must work alongside accountability if communities want lasting progress. The most effective local approaches pair help with expectations, support with standards, understanding with responsibility.

Temperance provides the steadiness needed to navigate conflict and pressure. It allows leaders to stay focused on long-term outcomes rather than chasing short-term victories. It encourages patience when decisions are complex, and restraint when the political climate rewards overreaction.

Above all, balanced leadership requires courage. Not the theatrical kind that seeks applause, and not the reckless kind that ignores risk. Courage in public life is often quieter. It appears in the willingness to make decisions that serve the long-term health of the community even when those decisions are not politically convenient. It shows up when leaders speak honestly about trade-offs, resist the gravitational pull of extremes, and stay committed to solutions that reflect the full complexity of the situation.

Yet leadership alone cannot build the civic culture we need. A thriving community depends on residents who bring these same qualities into their everyday interactions. That means approaching public dialogue with curiosity rather than assumption. It means creating space for disagreement without turning it into division. It means recognizing that priorities such as environmental stewardship, housing, safety, economic vitality, and fiscal discipline are not competing agendas. They are shared responsibilities that must be woven together if the community is to flourish.

When we engage one another this way, the middle path becomes visible again. It looks less like indecision and more like the place where workable solutions take shape. It invites people to look at the full problem, not just one piece of it. It reminds us that progress rarely comes from choosing one extreme over another, but from integrating values that matter on both sides of an issue.

Clallam County already has the ingredients for this kind of civic life. We have residents who care deeply about this region, who bring different strengths and experiences, and who want their community to succeed. Balanced leadership can model a healthier approach. A balanced community can bring that model to life.

Conclusion: Choosing the Path Where Solutions Live

Clallam County stands at a moment shaped by real challenges but also real opportunity. The pressures we face—economic, social, environmental, and civic—will not be solved by doubling down on extremes or by treating disagreement as a dividing line. They will be solved by people who are willing to look past the noise, focus on what matters, and work together with steadiness and purpose.

Most of us are not searching for perfect ideological alignment. We are searching for solutions that make our community safer, healthier, and more hopeful. We want reliable infrastructure, attainable housing, strong local businesses, and public systems that function with transparency and discipline. We want a civic culture where disagreement is part of the process, not a barrier to participation.

The path to that future lies in the balanced middle. It’s the place where integrity and courage can actually shape decisions. It’s where compassion and accountability work in tandem. It’s where competing priorities can coexist instead of collide. And it’s where residents and leaders alike can focus on long-term wellbeing rather than short-term wins.

Clallam County has all the ingredients it needs to move in this direction: people who care, people who listen, and people who want to build a stronger community. If we choose balance over extremes and curiosity over assumption, we can create a civic culture that reflects the best of who we are.

The loudest voices will not determine our future. The steady work of people committed to the middle path will. That is where solutions take root, and where a more connected, resilient Clallam County can grow.

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it’s the person who is “actually in the arena” who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Subscribe now

Steven also contributed extensively to our recent feature, OMC at a Crossroads: What’s Broken—and What’s Next?. This letter serves as a thoughtful follow-up, offering his independent, data-informed perspective on the financial realities facing Olympic Medical Center and our community.

Executive Summary

Olympic Medical Center (OMC) has endured three difficult years marked by falling margins, inaccurate budgeting, and a steep decline in cash reserves—from more than $100 million in 2020 to just $21 million at the end of 2024. The hospital’s heavy reliance on Medicare and Medicaid (84% of gross revenue) has kept patient revenue at less than half of billed charges, leaving little room for error as expenses climbed. Despite these headwinds, OMC’s new interim leadership appears to be stabilizing operations, restoring financial discipline, and creating a culture of accountability grounded in measurable performance metrics.

The 2025–2026 budgets reflect this shift: capital spending has been cut and accounts payable stretched to preserve cash, revenue forecasts seem conservative to me, and early signs of improvement are emerging, including positive EBIDA margins in recent months. Operating losses will persist for now, but operating cash flow could turn positive as receivables are collected, while the other areas of cash use such as debt service remains steady, and capital spending remains constrained. Beyond cash preservation, the focus has turned toward efficiency—driving productive hours per patient day and per wRVU, improving billing accuracy, and tightening departmental management. OMC is not out of the woods, but it is finally moving from crisis control to operational stabilization, with leadership emphasizing what can be controlled locally rather than blaming external factors.

A Fresh Look at OMC’s Financial Picture

Given its massive local presence and impact - and simply because I am a data nerd that is focused on the economic health of our community - I spent a few hours this week building a financial model for Olympic Medical Center. As a Chartered Financial Analyst, I’m accustomed to modeling publicly traded private companies in the tech sector, but this is the first time I’ve applied that framework to a public hospital. The business model is unlike anything I’ve studied before: actual patient revenue is far below gross charges due to the hospital’s payor mix and government reimbursement rates, and the accounting treatment of tax levies as revenue adds another layer of complexity.

I’ve now built a full income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow forecast through 2026 based on the recently released draft budget, and have even begun outlining what a sustainable 2027 model might look like. Yesterday’s management update helped fill in several gaps, offering new clarity into how leadership is tackling OMC’s liquidity pressures and operational inefficiencies.

Setting the Context

OMC operates 67 available beds and handles roughly 4,000 admissions per year. Its clinics account for approximately 150,000 annual visits, the emergency room treats around 27,000 patients, and home-health operations add another 40,000 visits. The hospital employs about 1,400 full-time staff, making it Clallam County’s largest employer.

Because OMC does not publish detailed service-line financials, my analysis focuses on consolidated results. In 2024, GROSS patient revenue totaled $556 million, yet because Medicare and Medicaid represented 84% of the total payor mix—with Medicare alone accounting for roughly 61%—ACTUAL “Patient Revenue” fell to $256 million, or 46% of billed charges. Including tax levies and property-related income, total operating revenue reached $266 million. This extreme gap between billed and collected revenue is one of the defining factors of “known unknowns” in OMC’s business model.

Looking Back: How We Got Here

To understand the current situation, it’s important to look at how the hospital arrived here. Since 2019, patient revenue has grown at a compound rate of 4–5% annually, though the path has been uneven. In 2021, post-pandemic volumes rebounded sharply, with nearly 15% year-over-year growth. But by 2022 and 2023, revenue flattened while expenses continued to rise.

Even more concerning was how consistently the hospital missed its own forecasts. In 2022, OMC budgeted for $256 million in operating revenue but ended the year $12 million short; expenses were $11 million higher than planned. In 2023, the pattern worsened: a $268 million operating revenue target missed by $31 million, with expenses again exceeding budget. These miscalculations produced operating losses of -$18 million in 2022 and -$28 million in 2023. Including non-operating income, net margins fell from a steady 2–5% in earlier years to -6.6% in 2022 and -10.9% in 2023.

The result was a double blow—lower revenue and higher costs—compounded by weak forecasting. It’s no surprise that community confidence eroded, but equally clear that management was flying blind without accurate financial modeling.

2024: Modest Progress but Still in the Red

Last year offered signs of improvement, even if profitability remained elusive. Actual “Patient Revenue” rose 12.4%, roughly matching the original budget, while expenses grew 5%. Despite the revenue rebound, expenses still ran $10 million higher than planned producing an operating margin of -4.5% and a loss of roughly $13 million. This loss was about half the amount compared to the prior year. The financial bleeding had not stopped, but it has at least begun to coagulate (sorry, I could resist the pun).

Cash flow remained strained. Reported operating cash flow was negative (-$9 million), the fourth consecutive year of a negative result (2022 was -$8 million and 2023 was -$17 million). Capital expenditures over the past year remained steady and averaged about $10-12 million annually. Including debt service (annually ~$2 million in principal and $2 million in interest costs), ending cash and investments dropped from more than $100 million in 2020 to $83 million in 2021, then fell by roughly $20 million per year to $21 million at the end of 2024. At that pace, insolvency would have been only a few quarters away without intervention.

2025–2026: Stabilization and a Shift in Mindset

Over the past couple of weeks (including an update yesterday), the interim CEO and CFO presented a pragmatic plan for the next two years. For 2025, they project Patient Revenue of $275 million (+7%) and total operating revenue of $293 million (+10%). Even so, the hospital expects another operating loss of around -$16 million. The key difference this time is that management is budgeting to preserve cash rather than overshoot it.

Capital spending has been cut in half to $5 million, and payables are being stretched by another $5 million—a short-term tactic that improves liquidity. The CFO relies on a simplified measure called EBIDA (earnings before interest, depreciation, and amortization), which adds back about $17 million in non-cash depreciation to operating income. His quick rule of thumb is that if OMC’s losses stay below $17 million, the hospital can maintain positive operating cash flow.

Initially, I worried this strategy was masking a deeper liquidity problem. But upon reviewing a draft of the 2024 cash flow statement, I saw that the change in accounts receivable grew by $19 million, which artificially depressed last year’s operating cash flow. If those receivables are slowly collected, I believe ending 2025 cash on hand could actually rise by $3–4 million, even as accounting losses persist.

The 2026 forecast looks incrementally better, with a projected operating loss of -$7.4 million. Adding back the non cash depreciation leave EBIDA of $9 million and a +3% EBIDA margin. Combined with still lower capital spending of $3.2 million and assuming continued stretched payables and improved collections, cash reserves could again rise by a $5-10 million dollars (and perhaps a bit more). In short, OMC appears to have transitioned from freefall to stabilization—buying precious time for deeper structural improvements.

What We Heard from the CFO and CEO

At this week’s finance meeting, the CFO reported that OMC ended September with 28 days of cash on hand, compared to 29 days at the end of 2024—essentially flat, which in the current environment qualifies as progress. EBIDA margins were positive at 2% for the month of September, suggesting some early traction.

The other notes I wrote down were:

• Emergency room visits, typically around $3,000 per visit in gross charges, represent a critical revenue driver.

• Accounts receivable collection times have improved, with Days Revenue Outstanding now at 35 days, better than the 44.5-day standard for a BBB rating. However, as more Medicare beneficiaries shift into Medicare Advantage plans—now about 60% of the Medicare population—claims processing has become more complex. Many denials are now AI-generated, prompting the hospital to focus on documentation accuracy and provider accountability to reduce rejections.

• Accounts payable have risen to $27.4 million (from $21.4 million a year ago), another short-term cash-preservation lever that will eventually need to unwind.

• The CFO emphasized that capital investment remains far below sustainable levels. Depreciation runs about $16 million per year, but capital spending has been slashed to $5 million in 2025 and $3.2 million in 2026. That imbalance—known as the reinvestment ratio—is manageable for a couple of years but will create a deferred-maintenance issue if not addressed.

• The Debt-to-capitalization ratio is now at 36.8% versus a 30% target. This is not because of increased borrow, but instead operating losses decreasing our capital, the denominator in the ratio. With losses reducing equity, access to capital markets will likely remain tight until the hospital demonstrates sustained profitability.

Operational Efficiency: The Next Frontier

The CFO made a point that two key labor productivity measures will determine whether OMC can move from stabilization to profitability. The first, Productive Hours per Adjusted Patient Day, measures how many staff hours it takes to deliver care across inpatient and outpatient services. Lower numbers signal greater efficiency and better use of staffing resources.

The second, Productive Hours per wRVU, focuses on clinic operations. A wRVU, or “work Relative Value Unit,” reflects the intensity and complexity of a provider’s work and is a standard benchmark for physician productivity. This metric shows how efficiently the organization converts staff time into billable activity. The CFO was candid: both metrics “need to get a lot better.” He acknowledged that these “conversations are difficult” for department heads, but insisted that they are necessary if OMC is to regain financial stability.

A Cultural Shift Underway

The interim CEO described a cultural reset rooted in transparency and accountability. Each department now meets monthly to review data, confirm accuracy, and discuss progress on specific performance targets. His mantra—“no more and no less”—summarizes the effort to align staffing levels precisely with patient demand.

He added, “Everything is fair game, so long as patient quality and service don’t suffer.” That philosophy captures the new approach: discipline without austerity, data without detachment. The hospital is moving from anecdote to evidence, from defensive explanations to operational metrics.

Conclusion

I left the meeting with cautious optimism. OMC’s interim leadership is professionalizing the organization, focusing on controllable levers like productivity, scheduling, and billing accuracy rather than fixating on external reimbursement rates. The numbers still show losses, but they also show stabilization—a crucial first step in any turnaround. There are many changes still required to create a long term viable business model. We must move quickly to make that happen. My gut feel is that if we can control costs, while improving productivity to generate $300 million in Patient Revenue (and ~$315 in total operating revenue), we will generate enough cash flow to fund capex, pay suppliers and rebuild our capital. I don’t know if this is probable in 2027, but it seems possible to me.

It bears repeating that many rural hospitals face similar payor mixes and still manage to turn a profit. The difference is execution. OMC’s new leadership seems to understand this, and the early data suggests that financial discipline and cultural accountability are finally taking root. The hospital’s next challenge will be translating these incremental gains into long-term sustainability, but for the first time in several years, that goal feels achievable.

P.S. I am not a healthcare expert, so I would love to hear any feedback - especially on managing Productive Hours per Adjusted Patient Day in the hospital or per wRVU in the clinics. Please message me if you don’t mind educating me a bit.

Charts

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it’s the person who is “actually in the arena” who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

The following article was developed primarily from the substantial research and writings of Steven Pelayo, whose detailed analyses and community discussions have helped illuminate the challenges and opportunities facing Olympic Medical Center. His work—shared across public forums, community groups, and with the Port Angeles City Council—provides the foundation for nearly every insight contained here.

Clallam County Solutions’ role has been to compile Steven’s thoughtful contributions, add relevant context from public meetings and reports, and present this as a single, comprehensive story. Our goal is to honor the depth of Steven’s work, highlight his reasoned approach, and make this important conversation accessible to the broader community.

Why OMC Matters Right Now

Olympic Medical Center is more than a building—it’s the backbone of care on the North Olympic Peninsula and one of Clallam County’s largest employers. When OMC is healthy, families get timely care close to home, jobs are stable, and local dollars keep circulating. When it falters, we all feel it: longer waits, deferred services, and stress on hundreds of livelihoods tied to the hospital’s payroll and purchasing.

The current crisis is visible in everyday life—MRIs that take months, specialists leaving, and staff stretched thin. The key, though, isn’t to wallow in what’s wrong; it’s to own what’s fixable and act. That means doing two things at once: (1) facing facts about financial losses and self-inflicted setbacks (like compliance lapses and the 340B miss) and (2) executing local, practical improvements—better scheduling and throughput, accurate documentation and revenue capture, clear access metrics, and transparent reporting the public can follow.

Clallam County Solutions exists for this kind of moment. We’ll credit what’s working, name what isn’t, and keep the focus on solutions that protect patient care and local jobs. OMC’s future isn’t a partisan question; it’s a community project. With disciplined execution and steady governance, we can preserve high-quality local care and the economic stability it supports.

The Numbers: What the Crisis Looks Like

Olympic Medical Center’s challenges are not abstract—they’re measurable, and they’re serious. “According to OMC’s September 2025 Interim CFO presentation, the hospital has lost roughly $70 million since 2022 and now carries about $25–30 million in unpaid vendor bills. As of this fall, the hospital has about 30 days of cash on hand, well below the 60-day minimum required under its loan covenant with KeyBank—a technical breach that limits flexibility and heightens financial risk.

But cash shortfalls only tell part of the story. About 85 percent of OMC’s patients rely on Medicare or Medicaid, programs that reimburse below the cost of care. That’s a national challenge for rural hospitals, but OMC’s current situation also reflects a series of local management failures that magnified those pressures.

One of the biggest: the loss of the federal 340B drug-pricing program, which had saved the hospital an estimated $8–8.5 million annually. The program wasn’t “suspended” by Washington—it was lost because of internal missteps in compliance tracking. As Pelayo notes, “There are entire consulting firms built to make sure hospitals maintain eligibility. We took our eye off the ball.” Combined with earlier compliance issues involving CMS and DOH, these are mistakes that could have been avoided—and each one has real financial consequences.

OMC’s interim CFO, Dennis Stillman, has also flagged vendor payments as a mounting concern. Payables should ideally sit in the “mid-teens” of days outstanding, but they’re now nearly double that. This is more than an accounting issue—it affects local contractors, suppliers, and partners who rely on timely payment.

Meanwhile, revenues aren’t keeping pace with costs. “We can’t cut our way to prosperity,” Steven Pelayo reminds us. “At some point, we have to grow.” Growth means improved utilization—seeing more patients, retaining more procedures locally, and using the staff and facilities we already have more effectively.

The bottom line: OMC faces a financial crisis, but not an irreversible one. Its current cash position and payables are warning lights, not a death sentence. What happens next depends on whether the community can sustain the discipline, transparency, and urgency needed to rebuild both trust and solvency.

Causes: Two Halves of the Same Story

It’s easy to blame Washington, D.C. for OMC’s struggles—and yes, rural reimbursement formulas are stacked against small communities like ours. But as Pelayo emphasizes, the harder truth is that much of OMC’s crisis is self-inflicted. The financial damage we’re facing didn’t come solely from national policy; it came from local oversight failures and missed accountability that allowed preventable problems to compound.

Part One: Self-Inflicted Headwinds

Over the past several years, OMC has weathered three major setbacks that were largely avoidable:

1. CMS and DOH compliance violations, which required outside consultants to fix and temporarily jeopardized reimbursements.

2. The loss of the federal 340B drug-pricing program, which had provided $8–8.5 million in annual savings and was forfeited through internal process failures, not regulatory bias.

3. Chronic underperformance in revenue management and scheduling systems, which left productivity and billing opportunities on the table.

Each of these was, in Pelayo’s words, a “major screw-up.” They were not the inevitable result of federal underpayment—they were operational failures that reflect years of complacency. “We took our eye off the ball,” Pelayo says, “and the community deserves an honest accounting of that.”

The 340B lapse alone is enough to illustrate the cost of inattention. Hospitals across the country employ full-time teams or specialized consultants to ensure eligibility doesn’t lapse. OMC did not. The resulting loss of $8–8.5 million per year is money that could have paid vendors, retained staff, or reinvested in equipment—and because requalification can take up to two years, the impact will stretch well into 2026.

Part Two: Structural Pressures

That said, OMC also operates within a national system that makes stability difficult. As mentioned, roughly 85 percent of its patients are covered by Medicare or Medicaid, which reimburse below the cost of care. Inflation in labor and supply costs, combined with the ongoing shortage of nurses and specialists, leaves hospitals like OMC with thin margins even in good years.

But those realities don’t excuse what happened locally—they make local discipline even more important. The federal model won’t change overnight. What OMC can control is execution: compliance, scheduling, billing accuracy, and financial oversight.

As Pelayo puts it, “We have to own what we can fix.” That means acknowledging mismanagement where it occurred, learning from it, and refusing to repeat it. The way forward starts with honest self-assessment—because a hospital can’t rebuild credibility without first confronting its own role in the crisis.

Turning the Ship: What Management Is Doing Now

For the first time in years, Olympic Medical Center is confronting its problems directly. Under the interim leadership of CEO Mark Gregson and Interim CFO Dennis Stillman, the hospital is rebuilding credibility by grounding every decision in data, transparency, and measurable results.

A Culture of Accountability

Gregson and Stillman have implemented a new performance dashboard that tracks key indicators—cash on hand, vendor payables, provider productivity, infection rates, patient throughput, and staff engagement. These metrics are now reviewed regularly by the board and management in open meetings. Gregson has emphasized that the numbers will be shared “for better or for worse,” signaling a shift toward honesty over comfort.

At the same time, the leadership team is tackling the inefficiencies that have long held OMC back: outdated scheduling, poor data flow between departments, and underutilization of staff. Aligning daily operations with patient demand could generate as much as $1 million per month in savings and new revenue opportunities—without layoffs—simply by right-sizing staffing and improving throughput.

Investing in Expertise

OMC’s engagement with the consulting firm Chartis—openly discussed at board meetings—has drawn both criticism and praise. The firm was brought in to help OMC resolve its CMS and DOH compliance issues and strengthen operational controls. With OMC’s annual revenue near $330 million, the consulting expense represents a small fraction of total operations.

As Pelayo notes, the point isn’t how much it costs, but what it delivers. One identified right-sizing initiative—once implemented—will more than cover the combined cost of interim leadership and consulting services. “His pay is irrelevant,” Pelayo says of Gregson. “His expertise is essential. If we’d hired him two years ago, we’d have lost significantly less money.”

Pelayo also points out that Gregson’s role is both necessary and thankless. “He’ll end up being the fall guy,” Pelayo says, “because change means cuts, and cuts create tension. But that’s exactly why a turnaround specialist was needed now—so a future permanent CEO can start fresh.”

Rebuilding Systems and Trust

Beyond financial repair, OMC’s new leadership is prioritizing cultural renewal. Employee town halls, engagement tracking, and new feedback mechanisms are designed to rebuild trust internally. Staff are encouraged to share ideas for improvement, knowing they’ll be heard rather than dismissed.

Gregson’s team is also restoring credibility externally by increasing transparency with the community. The goal is not to hide the pain of change but to demonstrate that change is purposeful. Each improvement, each metric, and each cost reduction ties back to one idea: keeping local healthcare viable.

As Pelayo summarizes, “Turnarounds aren’t easy—but the cost of doing nothing is worse. The hospital is finally being run with accountability, and that’s something the community should want to see through.”

The UW Option: Partnership Without a “White Knight”

As Olympic Medical Center stabilizes its operations, one topic continues to spark both optimism and confusion: a potential affiliation with UW Medicine. The idea of linking with one of the Pacific Northwest’s most respected medical systems is compelling—and rightly so. UW brings scale, expertise, and credibility that few rural hospitals can achieve alone.

But as Interim CEO Mark Gregson and Pelayo have both emphasized, this partnership—if it moves forward—will not be a financial rescue. The two organizations signed a non-binding Letter of Intent in mid-2025 to explore potential collaboration models. The process is still early, with months of due diligence ahead and no commitment to funding, acquisition, or debt relief.

What UW can offer, however, is capacity and leverage. A partnership could strengthen specialty care, expand access to telemedicine, and provide a platform for clinical collaboration and shared technology. It could also improve OMC’s ability to recruit and retain physicians, who are increasingly drawn to systems with academic and research ties.

Beyond operations, UW’s scale matters for another reason: advocacy. Rural reimbursement reform depends on bipartisan engagement in Washington, D.C.—and historically, OMC has lacked that reach. As Pelayo points out, “We need to partner with someone who can help us build bipartisan support. For too long, our representation in D.C. has leaned one-sided. UW has the connections and credibility to give our community a stronger voice on both sides of the aisle.”

That political and policy influence could prove as valuable as clinical collaboration. In a federal system where Medicare and Medicaid rules drive rural hospital solvency, being part of a respected statewide network amplifies OMC’s ability to be heard.

Still, no partnership will succeed if OMC enters it from a position of instability. UW is unlikely to formalize an agreement with a hospital still in financial crisis or local turmoil. “More disruption now,” Pelayo warns, “could jeopardize those talks entirely.” The current turnaround—however uncomfortable—is the foundation on which any future affiliation must be built.

In short, the UW partnership is not a white knight, but it could be a force multiplier. It won’t erase OMC’s financial problems, but it can amplify its strengths—expanding care options, improving advocacy, and securing a seat at the table in the broader healthcare policy conversation. The first step, though, remains ours: get stable, stay disciplined, and earn the kind of partnership that strengthens—not replaces—local control.

The Hard Fork Everyone Whispers About: Critical Access

Behind closed doors—and increasingly, in public discussions—a difficult question keeps resurfacing: should Olympic Medical Center consider converting to a Critical Access Hospital (CAH)? It’s a scenario few want to imagine, but one that has surfaced repeatedly in commissioner meetings and campaign debates. Understanding what it would actually mean is essential to understanding the stakes.

The CAH designation, created in the 1990s, was meant to preserve essential healthcare in remote communities at risk of losing hospital services entirely. It offers better Medicare reimbursement—typically 101% of allowable costs—but at a steep price: hospitals must limit themselves to 25 inpatient beds, maintain specific emergency-readiness standards, and operate within narrow distance rules that prevent two CAHs from being located too close together.

That last rule alone would have serious local consequences. Because Jefferson Healthcare is already a Critical Access Hospital just 35 miles away, federal regulations would likely require OMC to close or consolidate many of its Sequim operations if it ever converted. That would mean not only reduced access for patients but also hundreds of lost jobs. Based on conversations with two hospital commissioners, Pelayo estimates the number could exceed 300 positions across the system.

While CAH status might stabilize finances on paper, it would hollow out the hospital’s capacity. OMC currently serves about 45 inpatients per day, plus thousands of outpatient visits each month. Reducing that to 25 beds would shift much of Clallam County’s medical care to Port Townsend, Kitsap, or Seattle, straining regional hospitals and forcing local families to travel long distances for routine procedures.

CAH conversion isn’t a quick fix, either—it would take years to plan, approve, and execute. In the meantime, services would likely shrink and staff uncertainty would rise. “It’s not a realistic solution in the near term,” Pelayo explains. “The better option is to stabilize what we have now and make the existing model work.”

Still, the fact that OMC has even explored CAH scenarios underscores the urgency of the moment. Financial recovery is not just about cutting losses—it’s about preserving local control before decisions are made for us.

As Pelayo summarizes, “Critical Access status might keep the lights on, but it would come at the cost of our independence, our workforce, and the level of care this community deserves.” The better path—the harder path—is to fix what’s broken while OMC still has the capacity to shape its own future.

Voices from the Community

For all the spreadsheets and dashboards, Olympic Medical Center’s story remains a human one. Every line item represents people—patients waiting for care, nurses working double shifts, or local businesses waiting to be paid. That’s what makes this crisis personal. OMC isn’t an abstract institution; it’s where our neighbors are born, healed, and comforted when they’re most vulnerable.

What’s been remarkable about this chapter is how thoughtful the community conversation has been. Across meetings, news threads, and social media discussions—many of them spurred by Pelayo’s research—citizens have managed to debate facts without falling into division. The tone has been unusually respectful for such a high-stakes issue, and that’s something worth preserving.

Healthcare workers have spoken up about the daily strain. “When bedside providers are squeezed to do more with less, patient care becomes dangerous,” one nurse wrote. Others shared frustration over staffing shortages, broken systems, and the toll of uncertainty. Pelayo agreed but added an uncomfortable truth: without a stable financial foundation, even the most dedicated teams can’t keep serving people safely. “Sustainability,” he wrote, “isn’t about putting money ahead of people—it’s about making sure we can keep caring for people for years to come.”

Community members have also weighed in on leadership. Some have questioned the cost of hiring outside consultants and an interim CEO with a national turnaround background. But as Pelayo points out, the expense is trivial compared to the $70 million OMC has already lost since 2022. “If we’d hired him two years ago, we would have lost significantly less,” he says. “His pay is irrelevant. His expertise is essential—and we need help now.”

He also notes that the interim CEO’s role is by nature temporary—and often thankless. “He’ll end up being the fall guy,” Pelayo explains. “He’s here to make the hard choices no one else wants to make, so that the next CEO can start fresh. That’s how turnarounds work.”

Still, the public tone remains one of cautious hope. Even those who disagree about tactics largely agree on one thing: OMC matters, and its survival depends on working together. “We may disagree on how to fix it,” one commenter said, “but we all want a hospital that stays open, pays its bills, and treats people with dignity.”

That spirit—rooted in realism and respect—is exactly what gives this moment potential. When a community can discuss hard truths without turning on itself, it’s already started the work of recovery.

What’s Within Our Control: A 100-Day Local Action Plan

The first step in any turnaround is facing the facts; the second is acting decisively on what’s within reach. The next hundred days will determine whether Olympic Medical Center can rebuild stability and trust. As Pelayo puts it, “We have to focus on what’s within our control—and execute with urgency, consistency, and accountability.”

Drawing from Pelayo’s analysis and conversations with OMC staff and community members, the following represent his suggested areas for immediate local action—rooted in data, not politics, and focused on both stabilization and growth.

1. Increase Clinical Productivity and Access

OMC’s biggest opportunity lies in better utilization of existing staff and facilities. At recent meetings, leadership acknowledged that only a fraction of providers meet national productivity benchmarks. This isn’t about working harder; it’s about working more efficiently. By improving scheduling, closing referral loops, and expanding appointment capacity, OMC can serve more patients, reduce wait times, and capture revenue that’s currently walking out the door.

2. Reduce Service Delays and Bottlenecks

Patients across the county report months-long waits for imaging, cardiology, and orthopedic care. These aren’t staffing failures—they’re process failures. Leadership’s renewed focus on throughput metrics—like “door-to-provider time” and MRI turnaround—is key. Faster service means better outcomes, higher satisfaction, and stronger local loyalty.

3. Stabilize Vendor Payments and Rebuild Credibility

With $25–30 million owed to vendors, OMC’s relationships with local suppliers are strained. Paying those debts down in a structured, transparent way—back to the Interim CFO’s “mid-teens” target for days outstanding—will show discipline and rebuild trust. Clear communication with vendors about repayment plans is equally important.

4. Strengthen Documentation, Coding, and Revenue Capture

Revenue recovery depends on accuracy. OMC loses millions each year from documentation gaps and miscoded claims. Investing in risk adjustment and case-mix optimization training will ensure the hospital captures every dollar it’s earned. Growth doesn’t just mean more visits—it means smarter billing and fewer denials.

5. Maintain Transparency and Employee Voice

Transparency must extend beyond financial reports. OMC’s new performance dashboard should be shared publicly, even if the numbers aren’t flattering. That visibility builds credibility. Internally, employees need clear ways to provide input—an anonymous feedback system, regular town halls, and recognition for problem-solving at every level.

6. Grow Revenue, Not Just Cut Costs

OMC cannot save its way to prosperity. Sustainable recovery depends on increasing revenue through higher utilization, stronger physician retention, and expanded services. That includes rebuilding 340B eligibility, strengthening referral networks, and growing profitable outpatient care lines. “We can’t cut our way to growth,” Pelayo reminds us. “At some point, we have to grow.”

The Path Forward

These next hundred days are about momentum—visible progress that proves OMC is capable of change. None of these steps require new laws or outside bailouts. They require discipline, urgency, and steady leadership. If the hospital can demonstrate improvement—on access times, vendor payments, and utilization—confidence will begin to return.

As Pelayo says, “This isn’t about perfection; it’s about progress.” Each visible gain rebuilds trust—and each act of transparency strengthens the bridge between OMC and the community it serves.

Governance and Elections: Oversight vs. Operations

For all the attention on Olympic Medical Center’s finances, one of the most consequential decisions ahead lies outside its walls—at the ballot box. The upcoming hospital commissioner election will shape not just who governs OMC, but whether its recovery continues on course or changes direction midstream.

The question facing voters is not whether OMC needs accountability—it does—but what kind of leadership best delivers it.

The Case for Stability and Continuity

From Pelayo’s perspective, OMC’s fragile progress under Interim CEO Mark Gregson and Interim CFO Dennis Stillman depends on steady governance. “Mid-turnaround disruption,” he warns, “could stall the very progress we’ve waited years to see.”

Pelayo also points out that not all current board members share equal responsibility for past mismanagement. Penney Sanders, who joined the board in March 2025, wasn’t part of the prior leadership team that oversaw OMC’s decline. Ann Henninger, the current board chair, was involved during that period—but according to several accounts Pelayo has heard, she advocated for stronger corrective action and was outvoted by a four-member majority. That detail hasn’t been independently verified, but it may underscore a pattern of divided leadership more than deliberate neglect.

To Pelayo, the priority now is completing the turnaround already underway before shifting to long-term strategy. “Stability now,” he says, “advocacy next.” The idea is to finish implementing operational discipline before launching new initiatives or leadership changes that could slow momentum.

The Case for Fresh Perspectives

Many in the community, however, see the election as an opportunity to renew—not reset—the board. Three challengers come from healthcare backgrounds, and supporters argue that their clinical experience could make oversight more relevant to frontline realities. They see these candidates not as disruptors but as potential bridges between management and staff—leaders who can translate data into day-to-day context.

To this group, OMC’s problems are as much cultural as financial. They believe that adding commissioners with direct healthcare experience could help rebuild trust between staff and administration, ensuring that operational improvements never lose sight of patient care. “We need a board that listens to the people doing the work,” one community member wrote, “not just the people managing it.”

Finding Common Ground

These views aren’t mutually exclusive. The hospital needs both continuity and accountability, both stability and fresh insight. As Pelayo notes, the real issue isn’t incumbents versus newcomers—it’s whether commissioners understand their role: to oversee the CEO, not to manage the hospital. Good governance requires asking tough questions, respecting professional boundaries, and building trust through transparency.

Voters face a pivotal choice—but also a constructive one. Whether through continuity or renewal, OMC’s future depends on electing commissioners who value collaboration over politics, facts over rhetoric, and solutions over blame. The work ahead is too important for anything less.

Accountability, Transparency, and Follow-Through

After years of financial losses, compliance lapses, and leadership turnover, trust has become Olympic Medical Center’s most important currency. Fixing the numbers is essential—but restoring public confidence depends on what comes next: clear goals, visible results, and honest communication.

OMC’s interim leadership team has taken a major step forward by tracking and sharing performance data through its new operational dashboard. That system monitors key indicators such as cash on hand, vendor payables, provider productivity, infection rates, and patient satisfaction. The next step is making that same data available in a way the community can easily follow.

A public-facing summary, updated monthly, doesn’t need to be complicated—just consistent. The hospital could report a few key measures that matter most:

• Days of cash on hand (financial stability)

• Accounts payable days (timeliness of vendor payments)

• Wait times for imaging and specialty care (access)

• Readmission and infection rates (quality and safety)

• Employee engagement or turnover (workforce health)

Tracking these same metrics over time—honestly, without spin—would demonstrate real accountability. Missed goals can be explained; hidden results can’t.

As Pelayo puts it, “Accountability isn’t a buzzword—it’s a system. It’s how you prove that talk has turned into progress.”

Clallam County Solutions will continue to monitor these measures and report on OMC’s progress in that same spirit of transparency. The goal isn’t praise or criticism—it’s clarity. Change takes time, but integrity shows up every month in the numbers.

If OMC and its board keep those commitments visible and verifiable, trust will follow—not because the community is told to believe, but because it can see the evidence for itself.

Call to Constructive Engagement

Olympic Medical Center’s story is still being written—by its staff, its leadership, and the community it serves. The numbers may look daunting, but they aren’t destiny. As Pelayo notes, this is a moment for clarity and resolve, not despair. “We can’t fix what we won’t face,” he says—and right now, OMC is finally facing it.

The outcome depends on everyone.

• For staff, it means continuing to share ideas for improvement, even when change feels difficult.

• For leadership, it means maintaining transparency and following through on commitments.

• For commissioners, it means staying focused on oversight, not operations—and governing with discipline instead of politics.

• For the community, it means engaging constructively: asking hard questions, showing up at meetings, and insisting on truth over rumor.

The challenges are real, but so are the opportunities. This turnaround isn’t just about fixing a balance sheet—it’s about preserving local healthcare that reflects who we are as a community: resilient, honest, and capable of solving problems together.

If OMC stays disciplined, transparent, and forward-looking, this crisis could become the foundation for something stronger—a hospital that not only survives but grows smarter and more sustainable for the next generation.

Because in the end, OMC’s recovery won’t be defined by what went wrong—it will be measured by what we did next.

Acknowledgment

A special thank you to Steven Pelayo for his extensive research, thoughtful analysis, and the balanced, fact-driven approach he has brought to this complex topic. His dedication to understanding both the financial and human sides of Olympic Medical Center’s challenges has been invaluable. His work—and the respectful, data-based dialogue it has inspired—formed the backbone of this article and reflects the kind of civic curiosity and constructive engagement that strengthens our community.

Glossary

340B Drug Pricing Program – A federal program allowing eligible hospitals to purchase outpatient drugs at steep discounts, often saving millions annually. OMC lost its eligibility in 2025 due to internal compliance failures, costing an estimated $8–8.5 million per year until requalification.

CAH (Critical Access Hospital) – A federal designation designed to preserve essential care in remote communities. It reimburses Medicare at 101% of allowable costs but limits hospitals to 25 inpatient beds and restricts proximity to other CAHs (Jefferson Healthcare’s status prevents OMC’s Sequim facility from qualifying).

CMS/DOH Compliance – Oversight by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Washington State Department of Health. Maintaining compliance is mandatory for reimbursement and continued certification.

Days of Cash on Hand – A financial measure showing how long an organization can operate using only existing cash reserves. OMC currently holds about 30 days—half the minimum required under its loan covenants.

Accounts Payable Days (AP Days) – The average number of days a hospital takes to pay its suppliers. Higher AP days signal cash-flow strain and affect vendor relationships.

wRVU (Work Relative Value Unit) – A national standard for measuring provider productivity, used to evaluate workload and compensation fairness.

UW Medicine Affiliation – A non-binding Letter of Intent signed in 2025 between OMC and UW Medicine to explore partnership structures that may strengthen specialty access and bipartisan advocacy—not a financial rescue or acquisition.

Throughput Metrics – Operational indicators of how efficiently patients move through hospital systems, such as “door-to-provider time” or imaging turnaround.

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it’s the person who is “actually in the arena” who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

In the first part of this series, we mapped the scope of homelessness in Clallam County: not just the tents and encampments visible downtown, but also the families sleeping in cars, the seniors priced out of housing, and the young people leaving foster care without a place to land. In the second article, we turned to the helpers—leaders and organizations who make up the county’s patchwork safety net. They are the people who provide shelter beds, serve meals, offer counseling, and respond when crises spill into public spaces.

Together, those first two installments highlighted a truth that’s easy to overlook: there are no single causes and no single solutions. The spectrum of homelessness is wide, and so is the spectrum of responses.

But even the helpers themselves will tell you that the system is far from seamless. Services are stretched thin. Treatment is not always available when people are ready for it. Housing waitlists drag on for years. Rental subsidies sometimes go unused simply because no units can be found. Workforce shortages make it harder to recruit and retain skilled staff. And while many people find a path back to stability, others remain caught in cycles of addiction, trauma, and poverty that current resources cannot break.

This third article steps into that harder territory. It is not about assigning blame or painting a hopeless picture. Instead, it’s about naming the gaps that exist—gaps in treatment, housing, staffing, funding, prevention, and even public understanding. By acknowledging what isn’t working, we can better understand why progress often feels slow, and why persistence and honesty are so essential if we want real change.

Addiction, Fentanyl, and the Relentless Cycle

Ask anyone working closest to the ground what has changed most dramatically in recent years, and the answer comes quickly: fentanyl.

Joe DeScala of 4PA has watched the drug transform the landscape in just a short time. “The substance use… the fentanyl, has just completely taken over the last two years… when we first started, heroin was the main drug—we were picking up just tons and tons and tons of needles. And then all of a sudden… within a matter of months, [fentanyl] took completely over. The amount of needles that we picked up dropped off a cliff, almost like 90% reduction, and it all transferred over to the kits… used to do fentanyl. So that was a big shift.”

That shift has left deep marks on both the people experiencing homelessness and the systems trying to help them. Addiction complicates every other part of recovery. As Joe put it, “The barriers that keep [people] from taking advantage of… services—I think the addiction is probably number one. When you’re actively using, you lose track of time. Oftentimes you lose or break your phone… if you’re trying to keep yourself on a schedule and you’re wrapped up in that lifestyle, it’s pretty difficult.”

The reality, he stresses, is not that people don’t want help—it’s that fentanyl and other substances make it nearly impossible to stay connected to services or follow through on treatment plans. Even when motivation is there, the pull of addiction derails progress.

And the services themselves are limited. “For fentanyl, 30 days isn’t enough,” Sharon Maggard of Serenity House explained. Joe echoed that concern: “Thirty-day treatment is pretty quick. I’d love to see more 60 to 90-day treatments… and then if somebody can go from that into one of our facilities, like the Touchstone campus, and stay a year or so… then you’re not too far away from some sort of permanent supportive housing.”

This bottleneck—between treatment and stable housing—remains one of the system’s most critical weak points. People who genuinely want help may find a detox bed, but after 30 days they are often discharged back into shelters or the streets because there are no transitional programs to absorb them. The same dynamic plays out when people are released from hospitals, jails, or foster care without a stable place to go. Serenity House’s six-bed medical respite program, created in partnership with Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic, was designed to bridge that gap by offering short-term recovery space after hospitalization. But with fragile funding and limited capacity, it cannot keep pace with the need. Without coordinated stepping stones between crisis care and long-term stability, people frequently cycle back into homelessness, undoing the progress made in treatment or medical care.

Fentanyl may be the accelerant, but the fire often begins long before first use—rooted in family histories of trauma and instability. That’s where generational cycles come into focus.

Generational Cycles and Trauma

Not every person experiencing homelessness arrives there through a single crisis like job loss or medical debt. For a significant share of people, the roots stretch much deeper—back through families and across generations.

Sharon Maggard of Serenity House described what this looks like from the perspective of service providers: “At any of our agencies, there can be grandparents, parents, children, and even great-grandchildren in systems of care. The cycle of substance [ab]use and physical or mental trauma becomes an environmental structure in some households, and those are often our hardest cases to help.”

These families don’t just face the immediate loss of housing; they carry layers of inherited trauma that shape their daily lives. Substance use, violence, and instability may have been part of their environment for decades, leaving patterns that are hard to break. When three or four generations are connected simultaneously to shelters, treatment centers, and law enforcement, the challenges compound.

Two groups feel this weight most acutely—those just beginning adulthood and those nearing its end. Seniors are the fastest-growing segment of the unhoused in Clallam County, rising from 53 in 2021 to 88 in 2024—a 65% increase. Once older adults lose housing, they face hurdles that shelters and hospitals were never designed to meet: mobility limitations, chronic illnesses, and the need for help with daily living. Many end up bouncing between hospital stays and the streets, with few long-term care options available, often straining an already overburdened health care system.

At the other end of the age spectrum, young people aging out of foster care or unstable family situations are among the most vulnerable to homelessness. Sharon noted how limited the options are for them in Clallam County: resources exist for adults in shelters and for men in treatment programs, but youth often fall through the cracks. Without stable housing or supportive services, they face enormous risk of falling into the same cycles of trauma and addiction that shaped their families.

Breaking these cycles—whether generational or situational—requires more than emergency shelter or short-term treatment. It calls for trauma-informed care, prevention efforts that reach families early, and consistent support across multiple systems. Yet those investments are often the hardest to secure. As leaders like Sharon and Wendy point out, most funding flows to crisis response—keeping shelters open, managing emergencies, responding when things have already gone wrong. Prevention programs that could reduce the likelihood of people entering the system in the first place—such as housing support before eviction, long-term mentoring for at-risk youth, or family stabilization services—remain chronically underfunded.

For people born into these cycles, even imagining stability can feel out of reach. And yet, providers like Serenity House continue to meet them where they are—keeping them alive, connected, and offering small steps toward change, even when the journey is measured in years rather than weeks. Those long arcs of trauma collide with short-arc systems—30-day treatment windows, grant cycles, and scarce housing. That mismatch leads directly into the next challenge: the shortage of behavioral health services and housing capacity.

Gaps in Behavioral Health and Housing

If there is one theme that comes up again and again in conversations about homelessness, it’s that behavioral health services and housing supply are not keeping pace with the need. Treatment exists, but access is fragile, inconsistent, and too often determined by geography and funding rather than urgency.

As Wendy Sisk of Peninsula Behavioral Health explained, “We have a shockingly limited number of detox [and secure withdrawal management beds] for substance use disorders in the state.” For people ready to take the first step toward recovery, that scarcity is devastating: opportunities to stabilize are missed because the beds simply don’t exist.

Geography adds another barrier. Local options are so limited that PBH staff often have to transport people long distances off the Olympic Peninsula. “We’ll get them on a ferry, take them all the way to Oak Harbor… and then sometimes when we get there, there’s not a bed available,” one staff member shared. That uncertainty can undo someone’s willingness to try. For those battling withdrawal, even a delay of a day can mean relapse before treatment begins. Staff time is consumed by these long-distance transports, pulling them away from already heavy caseloads.

The challenges are especially steep for women. In Clallam County, the only residential treatment program is for men. Women who want inpatient care must leave the community entirely. PBH staff emphasized how daunting that choice feels: leaving children, partners, and familiar networks behind to enter treatment far away. Many women ultimately forgo treatment altogether because the fear of isolation outweighs the hope of recovery. Without local options, this gender gap leaves too many women without a viable path forward.

Funding fragility makes the system even more precarious. While PBH ensures that no one is turned away for inability to pay, many of their programs are grant-funded. “It’s all grant funded. People aren’t turned away, but the programs are only as stable as the funding is,” a staff member admitted. That instability makes it difficult to expand or plan for long-term capacity, even as the need grows.

Housing mirrors the same challenge. Sharon Maggard noted that Serenity House often has subsidies in hand but nowhere to use them: “I have a person that has a completed subsidy in their hand… and I have 160 of those right now out on the street looking… It isn’t a program deficiency. It really is, we don’t have the rentals here.” With waitlists exceeding 2,400 households as of mid-2024, even well-funded programs can’t keep pace when the units don’t exist.

And even when someone does make it into treatment, the journey is rarely straightforward. As one PBH staffer put it, recovery often looks like a “never-ending kind of revolving door.” Small steps—accepting food, showing up for an appointment—are progress, but relapse is common. For the public, who often expect quick results, this cycle can be misunderstood as failure. In reality, it reflects how deep addiction runs and how fragile recovery can be when treatment systems are stretched thin.

The result is a system where effort and commitment are present, but capacity falls far short of demand. Clinicians and outreach staff do extraordinary work every day, but without enough detox beds, supportive housing units, or secure funding, they are asked to fight a rising tide with limited tools. And when progress is this incremental and setbacks so visible, public frustration often grows—fueling misconceptions that make the work even harder, especially when the same names appear in police logs while beds and units remain scarce.

Misconceptions and Public Frustration

Few issues draw more frustration in the community than the belief that homelessness and crime are one and the same. The reality is far more complex.

Chief Brian Smith of the Port Angeles Police Department explained it this way: “One hundred percent of [property crime] is associated with substance use disorder. We just don’t deal with property crime that isn’t connected to that. But… that doesn’t mean that all [unhoused] people are doing that… A percentage of people that we encounter are committing property crime, and we deal with that. But… it isn’t the majority, for sure.”

That distinction is crucial. The majority of unhoused people in Clallam County are not engaged in crime. They are families, seniors, and individuals struggling with housing costs, medical bills, or untreated health needs. Yet the smaller group battling severe addiction or untreated illness accounts for a disproportionate share of police calls. Those repeat encounters are what the public sees most often—and what shapes perception.

The law itself compounds this cycle. As Chief Smith noted, “You can be arrested for the same misdemeanors over and over again… whatever the penalty is, you pay it, you serve your time, whatever.” For officers, this “catch and release” reality means encountering the same people again and again, without the leverage of escalating consequences or the resources to redirect them into effective treatment.

From the outside, this can look like willful refusal to change. From the inside, service providers and police see how addiction, mental illness, and systemic gaps keep people stuck. The frustration is real—felt by business owners, residents, officers, and even shelter staff who see progress undone by relapse or by systems stretched too thin. But so is the danger of oversimplification.

Misconceptions also extend to the very organizations trying to help. Joe DeScala has fielded accusations that 4PA discards the belongings of unhoused people during cleanup efforts. He rejects that narrative, pointing out that his group works openly and visibly in the community: “We’ve been accused of being an extremist mob… but I always say, if we were out committing crimes, why would we be wearing bright orange vests with 4PA written on the back, or driving trucks with lights flashing? We’ve never hidden what we do.”

Serenity House faces its own share of skepticism. Some critics accuse shelters of “enabling” homelessness by offering meals and beds without requiring sobriety or immediate change. Sharon Maggard pushes back against that view. For her, the question is not whether providing shelter solves the crisis, but whether failing to provide it allows people to survive at all. As she often reminds skeptics, without emergency shelter, people die on the streets.

These misunderstandings—both of people experiencing homelessness and of the providers who serve them—make a difficult job even harder. They feed public cynicism, weaken trust, and fuel the sense that nothing is working. But as the interviews make clear, the reality is neither as simple nor as hopeless as critics often claim.

Recognizing that complexity matters. It allows space for nuance: to acknowledge that yes, there are people who commit crimes or relapse into addiction, but also that most want stability and simply can’t reach it with the tools available. And it allows room to appreciate that helpers are not enabling failure but preventing worse outcomes in a strained system.

Still, these pressures don’t stop at public perception. They land heavily on the people inside the system itself—stretching staff and volunteers close to breaking.

The Human Cost — and the Cost to Helpers

Behind the statistics are not only people experiencing homelessness, but also the staff and volunteers working daily to respond. Their compassion is the backbone of the system, but it comes with a cost.

At Serenity House, Sharon Maggard has seen her housing staff stretched thin by the imbalance between a tenant’s ability to adapt to the structure of stable living and the realities of permanent supportive housing. Many residents come in with disabilities, substance use disorders, or other challenges that make it difficult to adjust to shared spaces and behavioral expectations. “We support thousands of people every year through rent and eviction prevention, and yet we only have 51 permanent supportive housing apartments—and those don’t turn over unless somebody dies, goes to jail, or we’re forced to evict,” she said. “The waitlist is currently 144 households.”

That imbalance goes beyond numbers—it’s about maintaining safety and structure. “Our tenants agree to follow simple rules like no smoking or using drugs indoors,” Sharon explained. “But when someone is struggling with addiction or mental health issues, that structure can be hard to maintain. Once housed, they have the right to refuse services, which leaves our staff constantly trying to keep everyone safe while calling on partners to help manage behavioral health or substance use problems.”

The pressure on staff is not just logistical—it is emotional. “When our limited resources can’t help us resolve a behavioral problem, we sometimes have to evict people, and that’s heartbreaking,” Sharon said. “Normally this leads to a full twenty to forty-thousand-dollar cost to evict and repair our apartments.”

In 2024, Serenity House’s Port Angeles shelter alone provided 42,679 bed nights and served more than 50,000 meals to 661 individuals. Each of those nights and meals represents a person kept safe indoors, able to receive treatment, and connected with referrals to partner agencies for ongoing support. Those same numbers also highlight the relentless pace placed on staff. Demand is steady and overwhelming, with little relief in sight.

The strain is similar at Peninsula Behavioral Health. Wendy Sisk acknowledged the frustration her staff feel when demand for services keeps growing, even as physical space and staffing remain limited. “We’re running out of office space… my staff are full to the max,” she said. But she emphasized that PBH does not have a waitlist for therapy or treatment—contrary to a persistent public rumor. “That’s something we’re really working hard to dispel,” Wendy explained. “Anyone who needs help can begin services quickly, because we intentionally keep our doors open for walk-in access.”

While PBH ensures timely entry into care, ongoing workforce shortages still mean heavy caseloads and emotional strain for clinicians. Supervisors describe the difficulty of hiring and retaining staff with the right mix of skill and resilience: “If we hire the wrong staff, it can actually do harm… it’s hard to find people with the skills and the compassion who can stay in it.” The result is a cycle of burnout and turnover, with those who remain carrying more weight than ever.

The problem isn’t just burnout—it’s retention. Experienced staff who know how to navigate complex systems, build trust with clients, and de-escalate tense situations are often the ones most at risk of leaving. When they burn out, agencies don’t just lose manpower; they lose hard-earned expertise that cannot easily be replaced. Each departure leaves new hires to start from scratch, with clients experiencing the disruption most directly. And when trust is the currency of change, the loss of a familiar case manager can set a client back months.

Even the logistics wear people down. PBH staff often transport clients hours away for detox or treatment because no local options exist. As one employee shared, “We’ll get them on a ferry, take them all the way to Oak Harbor… but that means I lose a staff member for the next day, because it’s exhausting. It’s a huge ask, even though people do it because they care.”

Law enforcement feels a parallel strain. The Port Angeles Police Department is operating with far fewer officers than its workload demands. Calls related to substance use, repeat offenders, and public safety pile on top of everyday policing duties, pulling officers in multiple directions at once. For Chief Smith, the shortage means responding to the most urgent needs often comes at the expense of proactive community policing. Instead of building trust through consistent presence, officers are stuck in a cycle of crisis response, which deepens both community frustration and officer fatigue.

This is the quieter cost of the crisis: the toll on those trying to hold the system together. Burnout, compassion fatigue, and retention struggles are not abstract terms—they’re lived realities for the case managers, shelter staff, clinicians, and officers who face the cycle day after day. And yet, despite exhaustion and limited resources, they keep showing up. Their persistence may not solve homelessness outright, but without it, the fragile safety net holding the community together would collapse.

These human costs underline a larger truth: the challenges of homelessness in Clallam County are not only borne by those living without shelter, but also by the helpers working to respond. And understanding that reality sets the stage for the final question of this article—why naming these challenges, rather than avoiding them, is so essential.

Conclusion: Why Facing Challenges Matters

Looking closely at Clallam County’s homelessness response reveals a sobering truth: even the most dedicated helpers are working within systems that are stretched thin and often underpowered. Addiction—especially fentanyl—has transformed the landscape, creating barriers that short treatment windows and scarce detox beds cannot fully address. Generational cycles of trauma keep entire families tied to shelters, law enforcement, and behavioral health. Prevention programs that might break those cycles early are underfunded, leaving the system focused on crisis response rather than long-term change.

Some groups carry especially heavy burdens. Seniors are the fastest-growing segment of the unhoused, rising from 53 in 2021 to 88 in 2024—a 65% increase. Once older adults lose housing, their health and mobility needs often exceed what shelters can provide, leaving them caught between hospital stays and the streets. Youth face the opposite problem: aging out of foster care or unstable homes with almost no local programs designed for their unique circumstances. Both groups—at the bookends of life—highlight the urgency of creating housing and services that fit their specific needs.

Housing shortages add another layer, with subsidies sitting unused because there are no available units. Women face unique barriers to treatment, often forced to leave the community entirely to find residential care. And staff shortages ripple through every corner of the system, with burnout and turnover eroding the stability of the very organizations the community depends on.

These realities fuel public frustration and misunderstandings. Visible repeat offenders reinforce the perception that nothing is changing, while the quieter majority who want stability are often overlooked. Misconceptions extend to the service providers themselves, with groups like Serenity House or 4PA sometimes criticized unfairly for their approaches. The truth is more complicated: helpers are not enabling failure but preventing worse outcomes in a system with too few resources.

Naming these challenges is not pessimism—it is honesty. Honesty clears the way for persistence and solutions. Every meal served, every therapy appointment kept, every shelter bed opened matters, even if the broader system feels overwhelming.

In the next installment, we’ll turn directly to the intersection of homelessness and public safety. We’ll hear more from Chief Brian Smith and look closely at crime statistics from the Port Angeles Police Department. We’ll explore both the visible impacts—encampments, property crimes, repeat offenders—and the less visible reality that most people experiencing homelessness are not engaged in crime at all. Balancing safety and compassion is one of the greatest challenges our community faces, and in the fourth installment we’ll examine why both must be pursued together.

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it’s the person who is “actually in the arena” who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Welcome back, I’m so glad you’re on this journey as we grapple with such an important issue facing our community. In the last article in this series on homelessness in Port Angeles, we mapped the landscape of homelessness in Clallam County—the scope, who is most affected, and the pressures driving instability. To see the human side more clearly, I began with a two-hour group interview with four local leaders: Joe DeScala (4PA), Sharon Maggard (Serenity House), Wendy Sisk (Peninsula Behavioral Health), and Chief Brian Smith (Port Angeles Police Department). Two hours only scratched the surface.

That conversation led to hours of follow-up interviews and a deeper dive into local data. Their voices, and the statistics that frame them, will unfold across this series.

This piece turns to the helpers. Across Clallam County, front-line teams face work that can feel overwhelming. They show up anyway—not because they can end homelessness overnight, but because every shelter bed, every meal, and every link to care matters. Sometimes their views overlap; sometimes they diverge. Taken together, they reveal what it means to be “on the front lines”—imperfect, candid, collaborative—and why, without them, the situation would be far worse.

Joe DeScala and 4PA: A Grassroots Voice

For Joe DeScala, founder of 4PA, addressing homelessness and addiction starts with presence—being visible, accountable, and practical in the places where help is needed most. 4PA—short for For Port Angeles—is a grassroots nonprofit that brings volunteers together to support public safety, respond to community needs, and create pathways for people ready to turn their lives around. If you’d like a fuller introduction to their work, I’ve profiled the organization previously in Touchstone of Change: Local Non-Profit 4PA Steps Into the Arena on Clallam County Solutions.

4PA began with something simple: community cleanups. Volunteers rolled up their sleeves, picking up garbage and abandoned items in public spaces, not just to beautify the town but to restore a sense of safety and care for shared spaces. From there, the group evolved. What started as cleanup efforts grew into a larger vision: creating a place where those in need could find refuge from the weather, safety from the streets, and an opportunity to gain skills that would help them move further from homelessness and closer to stability.

In the broader system of organizations addressing homelessness, 4PA fills a distinct role: providing a “high barrier” model of support. Their program requires sobriety for those who wish to engage with their services. For some, that line is controversial, but for Joe it is a matter of compassion grounded in realism: without sobriety, stability cannot last. 4PA offers people a safe environment, job training opportunities, and a structured community designed to help them transition into more secure, long-term housing.

This perspective also shapes how Joe talks about the crisis. He is candid about what he sees as the central role of addiction—and especially fentanyl—in driving instability and crime. Chief Smith chimed in, “There’s no property crime here that isn’t related to substance use. If you wanted to centralize your crime conversation, you’d talk about fentanyl—the people who sell it, the people who are dealing it, and the people who steal for it. That’s a much more accurate conversation than tying homelessness to crime.” His point, shared by Joe, is not to stigmatize but to insist on honesty: without naming fentanyl as a driver, it is impossible to respond effectively.

At the same time, Joe resists reducing homelessness to a single cause. “Homelessness can cover a broad spectrum of people, but that essence of having that stable place of dwelling is kind of what I go by. A tent doesn’t constitute that. Couch surfing doesn’t constitute that. It’s more than that.” For him, the measure of success is not temporary relief but stability—the kind of housing and support that allows people to rebuild their lives.

That combination—realism about the devastation of addiction, insistence on stability through sobriety, and optimism about the community’s ability to face hard truths together—is what defines both Joe and 4PA. They do not promise easy answers. But in their visibility, their boundaries, and their willingness to show up day after day, they offer Port Angeles something vital: a model of grassroots engagement that refuses to give up on either honesty or hope.

Sharon Maggard and Serenity House: The First Rung of Emergency Shelter

If there is a cornerstone in Clallam County’s homelessness response, it is Serenity House. Under the leadership of Executive Director Sharon Maggard, Serenity House has become the second largest housing and shelter provider in the county (behind only the Peninsula Housing Authority), serving thousands of people every year. Where other organizations fill specialized roles, Serenity House anchors the system: providing food, safety, warmth, and a first step toward stability for those with nowhere else to go.

In the spectrum of homelessness services, Serenity House occupies the emergency and transitional housing lane. It is the place people go when their options have run out—families facing eviction, youth aging out of foster care, adults sleeping outside in the cold. The Port Angeles adult shelter alone provided more than 35,000 bed nights to 634 unique guests in the past year, while its kitchen served more than 52,000 meals. Beyond that, Serenity House’s programs supported more than 3,200 households countywide, from rental assistance to transitional housing (per the organization’s most recent annual report).

The decision to take on this role was deliberate. For Sharon, the first step in recovery and stability is ensuring that people are safe tonight—fed, warm, and sheltered. “The causes for homelessness could be anything—I could have lost my job, lost a spouse, had a huge medical bill, or been in a domestic violence situation where it wasn’t safe to go back home. For some people it is addiction, but for many it’s just ugly life circumstances. I even have people in my shelter who go to work every day but still can’t find an apartment they can afford.”

At the same time, Sharon is frank about the hardest cases. A significant share of those who come through Serenity House are not just facing a temporary setback, but are caught in generational cycles of addiction and trauma. “At any of our agencies, there can be grandparents, parents, children, and even great-grandchildren in systems of care. The cycle of substance use and physical or mental trauma becomes an environmental structure in some households, and those are often our hardest cases to help.” These are the individuals and families who require long-term, trauma-informed care to break the patterns that have persisted for decades.

Why choose this lane, knowing it comes with such challenges? For Sharon, the answer is simple: because without emergency shelter, people die on the streets. Serenity House is often the front door of the system, the first place someone turns when they lose housing. By catching people at that moment of crisis, Serenity House prevents deeper harm and creates at least the possibility of moving forward—whether into transitional housing, supportive services, or eventually permanent housing.

The scale of the work is enormous, and the strain is real. Beds are full, the waiting list for affordable housing in Clallam County exceeded 2,400 people as of mid-2024, and staff are stretched thin. Yet Serenity House continues to show up. Each bed night, each meal, each youth reached through its programs represents someone who is not entirely alone in their struggle.

In the spectrum of solutions, Serenity House is the first rung: the place where people land when everything else has failed. Its role is not glamorous, and the challenges can feel overwhelming. But Sharon’s leadership reflects a steady mix of realism and compassion—the recognition that while no shelter can solve homelessness on its own, ensuring that no one is left completely without support is itself a vital part of the solution.

Wendy Sisk and Peninsula Behavioral Health: Meeting Behavioral Health Needs

Homelessness is not only a housing issue. In Clallam County, as in many rural communities, untreated mental illness and substance use disorders play a central role in who becomes unhoused and who struggles to find stability once they are. That is where Peninsula Behavioral Health (PBH), led by CEO Wendy Sisk, steps in. PBH is the largest provider of mental health and addiction treatment services in the county, making it a critical part of the safety net.

In the spectrum of organizations responding to homelessness, PBH fills the mental health and recovery role. Shelters can provide safety, and grassroots groups like 4PA can offer community and structure, but PBH provides the clinical and therapeutic services that help people stabilize their lives. Their focus is not only on crisis response, but also on long-term treatment and recovery—areas that, if left unaddressed, leave many people cycling between homelessness, jail, and hospitals.

One of the most important things PBH has built into its system is immediate access. As Wendy explained, “We do not have long wait times for treatment. We actually have walk-in access [at least once weekly] to get people started in care.” That kind of access is essential when someone in crisis makes the decision to reach out for help—delaying intake by weeks or months can mean losing that opportunity altogether.

Still, Wendy is quick to acknowledge the limits. Detox services, inpatient treatment programs, and supportive housing units are stretched thin, with far more demand than supply. It is one thing to get someone started in care quickly; it is another to keep them in recovery when long-term resources are lacking. That gap is not for lack of effort, but because Clallam County faces the same challenges seen nationwide: too few treatment beds, workforce shortages, and a rising tide of need.

Why does PBH take on this difficult role? Because, as Wendy and her team know, mental health and addiction are among the most powerful drivers of homelessness. Without treatment, stability is almost impossible to sustain. With treatment, the path forward—even if slow and uneven—becomes possible. PBH’s role is to make sure that path exists.

The impact is seen not only in individual recoveries but also in how PBH partners with other agencies. Their clinicians work with Serenity House to stabilize shelter guests, with law enforcement when someone in crisis is taken into custody, and with hospitals to ensure people leaving medical care are not discharged back to the streets. In each case, PBH provides the behavioral health expertise that no other local organization can.

Wendy’s leadership is marked by clarity and balance: she recognizes the limits of what PBH can do, but she is committed to ensuring that treatment remains available and accessible for those who seek it. In the wider safety net, PBH plays a unique role. It does not provide shelter beds or meals, but it addresses the underlying behavioral health needs that so often stand between people and long-term housing stability.

Chief Brian Smith and the Port Angeles Police Department: Public Safety in Balance

The Port Angeles Police Department is not a housing provider, a shelter, or a treatment agency. Yet homelessness inevitably intersects with public safety, making law enforcement an unavoidable part of the community’s response. For Chief Brian Smith, the role of the police is clear: to maintain public order, respond to crime, and deal with the visible impacts of addiction and homelessness. In the spectrum of organizations addressing this crisis, PAPD occupies the public safety and community order role.

Chief Smith is quick to emphasize that homelessness and crime are not the same thing. Most people experiencing homelessness in Port Angeles are not criminals, and he cautions against broad assumptions. “I wouldn’t tie the percentage of crime we have to people who are unhoused… they’re not the driver of our crime. There are people within that population that commit a crime, but the driver of our crime is people that commit the crime, and they’re generally not the people [who are homeless].”

At the same time, Smith does not minimize the impact of substance use. Addiction, he says, is where the overlap lies. Over the past decade, fentanyl has transformed the landscape of both public safety and homelessness. “Notable changes… ten years ago, heroin was a problem, methamphetamine was a problem, fentanyl had just sort of emerged. Fast forward, fentanyl is more damaging, more destructive, more addictive—probably the most addictive drug ever known in human history—and it’s everywhere. [Certainly an element of the] unhoused population here is really affected by substance use.”

Taken together, these two perspectives form the core of Smith’s message: being unhoused does not make someone a criminal, but the rise of fentanyl has pulled many vulnerable people into cycles of instability that spill over into public safety. For police, that means walking a fine line—holding accountable those who commit crimes, while also recognizing that addiction and poverty are often the underlying drivers.

That’s why PAPD leans on coordinated responses—pairing enforcement with handoffs to shelter, treatment, or medical care whenever possible. Balancing compassion with accountability is one of the hardest parts of the job. Officers are often placed in situations that stretch far beyond traditional law enforcement. They find themselves acting as social workers, health responders, or even mediators, navigating the blurred lines between public safety and human crisis. For Chief Smith, this underscores why partnerships matter. The police cannot—and should not—be the sole response to homelessness.

PAPD regularly collaborates with organizations like Serenity House, Peninsula Behavioral Health, and grassroots groups like 4PA. Officers transport people in crisis to shelters, connect them with detox or treatment when beds are available, and coordinate with outreach teams. In many cases, the police are the first point of contact when someone is in danger, and their actions can make the difference between a night in jail, a night in the ER, or a night in shelter.

The strain is real. Property crimes make up more than half of reported offenses in Port Angeles, and substance use is frequently a factor. Officers respond again and again to the same calls, often involving the same individuals. Without PAPD’s involvement, community safety and order would deteriorate further. But Smith is clear: policing alone cannot solve homelessness. It can only manage its public safety impacts while other systems—shelters, treatment providers, housing programs—do their part.

In the broader spectrum of solutions, Chief Smith positions PAPD’s role as both limited and essential. The police cannot build housing or provide treatment, but they can enforce accountability, reassure residents and businesses, and partner with service providers to redirect people toward help. His leadership emphasizes clarity: fentanyl is the real driver of much of the crime, and any effective response must combine accountability with compassion, law enforcement with collaboration.

The Safety Net in Action

Together, the work of these leaders forms Clallam County’s safety net. Here’s how their roles fit:

• Joe DeScala and 4PA focus on accountability, structure, and opportunity for those ready to pursue sobriety. Their high-barrier approach creates a safe space for people to take tangible steps forward, building skills and preparing for more permanent housing.

• Sharon Maggard and Serenity House anchor the emergency side of the spectrum—providing shelter beds, meals, and transitional housing for thousands of people each year. Their work ensures that no one is left without food, warmth, or a starting point, even when long-term solutions remain out of reach.

• Wendy Sisk and Peninsula Behavioral Health address the clinical needs that underlie so much of the crisis: untreated mental illness and substance use disorders. PBH provides immediate access to care and strives to offer longer-term treatment and recovery, even within the limits of rural resources.

• Chief Brian Smith and the Port Angeles Police Department play the role of public safety and accountability. Their officers respond to crime, maintain community order, and partner with service providers to redirect people in crisis toward help when possible.

Individually, each of these leaders would admit their work is not enough. But together, their organizations form a safety net that keeps countless people from falling further. Shelters prevent deaths on the street, treatment stabilizes lives in crisis, high-barrier housing offers structure and hope, and law enforcement manages the public safety impacts that ripple through neighborhoods.

The system is far from perfect, and the net often feels stretched to the breaking point. Yet without these efforts, Clallam County would face a far harsher reality. Their persistence doesn’t solve everything—but it proves our community hasn’t given up.

Collaboration and Common Ground

One of the most striking parts of bringing these four leaders together was how often they emphasized collaboration. Despite representing very different roles—grassroots outreach, shelters, behavioral health, and law enforcement—what stood out in the group interview was their respect for one another and their shared belief that working together is essential.

Chief Brian Smith described it plainly: “We work really well together. We respect each other. I will defend any one of these people and what they’re doing… we support each other, we appreciate each other, and we don’t expect each other to do things exactly the same way.”

For Sharon Maggard, the benefits of partnership have been measurable. She noted that stronger collaboration—particularly between Serenity House and the police department—has directly reduced strain on services. “I really think our strengthened partnerships over the last four years—and certainly working with the police department—[mean] our [police calls and service contacts] have almost halved. I think our ability to support each other is the reason.”

Wendy Sisk echoed that reflection, noting how far things have come since she first stepped into her role at Peninsula Behavioral Health. “One of the nice things about the group of providers in our community that are working… is that collaboration. I don’t think that’s always the case. And really, it wasn’t the case when I first took over this position.”

Sharon Maggard, who came out of a career at Intel before moving into nonprofit leadership, described a mindset she carries forward: the ability to commit to collaboration even when there are differences. “ The first thing you learn there is how to disagree and commit. I may disagree with you 100%, but if all of you say that’s where we’re going, I will commit 100% to help you go in that direction.” Wendy Sisk agreed with the sentiment, noting that even though her background is rooted in behavioral health, the principle resonates strongly in the way local providers now work together.

Taken together, these reflections show that the safety net in Clallam County is not just a patchwork of separate organizations. It is a web of partnerships, strengthened by leaders who trust one another and choose collaboration over competition. That willingness to work together—even when their methods or philosophies differ—is one of the clearest sources of hope in an otherwise difficult landscape.

Conclusion: The Helpers in Context

It would be easy to look at these stories and see only the hope: volunteers showing up in bright vests, shelters serving thousands of meals, clinicians opening their doors, and police officers working alongside service providers. And in truth, there is a great deal of hope here. These leaders and their teams are proving every day that compassion, persistence, and collaboration can make a difference.

But to stop there would be incomplete. None of these organizations would claim that their work is without flaws, or that the challenges are simple. Each faces limits—whether it is too few treatment beds, shelters stretched to capacity, staff under pressure, or the frustrations of dealing with repeat offenders. They know better than anyone that progress is often slow, uneven, and difficult.

Some readers may be tempted to say that this paints too rosy a picture, or that it overlooks problems within these systems. The reality is that both are true: there is good work happening, and there are serious challenges still to confront. To ignore either side would be misleading. What this article has aimed to show is that Clallam County has people in the arena—leaders who refuse to turn away and who, despite imperfections, are holding the line against a crisis that would be far worse without them.

In the next installment, we’ll turn directly to those challenges. We’ll look at what isn’t working: the barriers of limited funding and service capacity, the weight of staff burnout, and the misconceptions that shape public perception. We’ll hear from these same leaders about the realities that make this work so difficult—and why acknowledging those realities is essential if we want real solutions.

Holding both truths—the work being done and the barriers that remain—is how we move forward with the honesty and persistence this issue demands.

I hope you’ll join me as we continue on this journey!

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Homelessness is one of the most visible and pressing challenges in Port Angeles and across Clallam County. It’s a subject that often sparks strong emotions, from frustration and fear to compassion and determination. What’s clear is that no single story—or single solution—can capture the full scope of this complex issue.

When I began this project, I originally envisioned writing a single article. But after hours of interviews with local leaders, and digging through detailed data from Serenity House and the Port Angeles Police Department, I quickly realized that an issue as complex and nuanced as homelessness in our community deserved more space. To truly explore the challenges, the human stories, and the solutions being pursued, it needed to become a series.

This first article sets the foundation by taking a clear-eyed look at the landscape of homelessness in Port Angeles: who is affected, what the numbers reveal, and the root causes that drive instability. In the coming articles, we’ll turn to the helpers working on the front lines, examine the obstacles within our systems, take a closer look at public safety and substance use, explore cycles of trauma and addiction, and finally, highlight the solutions and community efforts pointing the way forward.

This is not an easy subject, but it is one where honesty and hope must walk together. By understanding the landscape, we can better appreciate the work already underway—and prepare ourselves to imagine what comes next.

The Spectrum of Homelessness — and What the Numbers Reveal

Homelessness in Clallam County is not a single experience—it exists on a wide spectrum. Some people lose housing suddenly because of a medical bill, a job loss, or a family crisis. Others face chronic struggles tied to addiction, mental illness, or disability that make it difficult to maintain stable housing without long-term support.

In the past year, Serenity House—the county’s largest housing and shelter provider—served more than 3,200 households across Clallam County. That figure includes families needing short-term rental help to avoid eviction, individuals in transitional housing, and guests in emergency shelters. The main shelter in Port Angeles alone provided over 35,000 bed nights to 634 unique guests, while its kitchen served more than 52,000 meals. Taken together, these numbers mean that nearly one in twenty county residents relied on some form of homeless assistance in 2024.

The people behind those numbers represent every demographic in our county. The majority of shelter guests are between 25 and 54 years old, but nearly one in five are seniors over 55. About 62% of clients identify as men and 36% as women, while a smaller number identify as non-binary or prefer not to answer. Roughly 6% identify as American Indian, Alaska Native, or Indigenous, reflecting Clallam’s tribal communities, while others identify as Black, Hispanic, or multiracial. Veterans, families with children, and young people aging out of foster care are also represented. Homelessness is not confined to one group, one age, or one neighborhood.

The annual Point-in-Time Count, a one-night survey of people experiencing homelessness, adds another layer to the picture. It showed a 33% increase in Clallam County’s unhoused population since 2021, with the steepest rise among people over the age of 55. Older adults who lose housing often face unique challenges: shelters and hospitals were never designed to provide long-term senior care, yet options like assisted living are usually out of reach without stable income.

At the other end of the spectrum, youth and young adults make up another vulnerable group. Serenity House’s youth department served 129 people between the ages of 12 and 24 last year. Many were leaving foster care, trying to continue education, or reentering the community after involvement with the justice system. Their paths look very different from those of older adults, but their basic challenge—finding safe and stable housing—is the same.

And even these figures don’t capture the full picture. Many people live in what service providers call “hidden homelessness”—doubling up with relatives, sleeping in cars, or moving between friends’ couches without any stable place to call their own. Families with children are especially likely to fall into this category, as are young adults. Their circumstances often fall outside official definitions of homelessness, yet the instability and risk they face are just as real.

Capacity limits only deepen the challenge. The Port Angeles shelter has room for 152 people, but turnover is constant: guests leave, return, or cycle between temporary housing and the streets, not because services are ineffective, but because the broader supply of affordable housing falls so short. By mid-2024, the Clallam County Housing Authority’s waitlist had more than 2,400 people, while supportive housing programs like Dawn View Court had six applicants for every unit.

The ripple effects extend beyond shelters and housing programs. According to Port Angeles Police Department data, property crimes such as theft and vandalism made up more than half of all reported offenses in 2024, with substance use frequently a factor. Officers stress that most people without housing are not involved in crime, but a smaller group struggling with untreated addiction or severe mental illness accounts for a disproportionate share of incidents. That overlap creates visible disruption and puts additional pressure on both law enforcement and service providers.

Together, these numbers reveal a system stretched to its limits. Shelters, kitchens, and outreach programs are keeping thousands of people alive and connected to services each year. Yet the shortage of affordable units and supportive housing means too many residents remain stuck in limbo—unable to take the next step toward stability even when they’re ready.

Root Causes and Community Pressures

Behind the statistics are deeper forces shaping the homelessness crisis in Port Angeles. While every individual story is unique, several common threads appear again and again in the data, in service provider reports, and in conversations with local leaders.

At its core, homelessness in our community is being driven by two powerful and interwoven forces: the socio-economic pressures of housing costs, poverty, and an aging population, and the rise of substance use disorders—especially fentanyl—that destabilize lives and ripple through families, neighborhoods, and public safety systems. These drivers are not separate; they reinforce one another. Someone who loses a job or faces a rent increase may fall into housing instability; someone struggling with fentanyl addiction may lose employment or family support. When these pressures converge, the path back to stability becomes even more difficult.

Rising Housing Costs and Limited Supply

The most immediate driver is simple math: demand for affordable housing far outpaces supply. Clallam County added only a few hundred housing units between 2022 and 2024, a growth rate of less than one percent per year. Meanwhile, rents have risen faster than wages, and vacancy rates remain extremely low. The 2024 Coordinated Entry report shows that the median rent for a two-bedroom unit in Clallam County is $1,324, while the median renter household income is about $35,000 per year. At that level, a renter would need to spend over 45% of their income on housing, well above the 30% threshold considered affordable. For those living at or below minimum wage, the gap is even wider.

The result is long waitlists—more than 2,400 people countywide for subsidized or supportive housing as of mid-2024. Facilities like Dawn View Court see six applicants for every available unit. For many families, even a small disruption such as a missed paycheck or unexpected medical bill can be enough to trigger housing instability.

Mental Health and Addiction

Behavioral health remains one of the most pressing pressures connected to homelessness. Peninsula Behavioral Health, the county’s largest provider, ensures that people can begin care quickly, with weekly walk-in appointments available to start treatment without a long wait. This immediate access is an important lifeline for those reaching out for help.

Yet the deeper challenge is capacity. Services like detox support, inpatient treatment, and supportive housing are limited, and many people cycle between shelters, hospitals, and the streets because those longer-term resources aren’t available when needed. Substance use disorders—particularly fentanyl and methamphetamine—are a devastating driver of homelessness in Clallam County. These substances fuel personal instability, contribute to recurring health crises, and ripple into public safety challenges as individuals in crisis interact with law enforcement or emergency medical responders.

The result is not a lack of entry into care, but a shortage of the sustained treatment and recovery options that many people need to stabilize their lives. Without those supports, even those who want help often find themselves back in the same cycle.

Generational Cycles of Addiction and Trauma

Another factor that contributes to homelessness in Clallam County is the cycle of generational addiction and abuse. Service providers estimate that 15–20% of people experiencing homelessness come from households where substance use, trauma, and instability have persisted across multiple generations. These are often the hardest cases to break through, because addiction and trauma become environmental structures within a family.

This does not mean that change is impossible, but it does underscore the depth of the challenge. Breaking generational cycles requires more than emergency shelter or short-term treatment; it demands sustained support, trauma-informed care, and community-wide commitment over time.

An Aging Population

The sharp rise in older adults experiencing homelessness underscores another systemic challenge. The Point-in-Time Count revealed that seniors are the fastest-growing segment of the local unhoused population, increasing more than 65% since 2021. Once a person over 55 loses stable housing, their prospects narrow quickly. Physical health needs often outpace what shelters are designed to provide, and without sufficient income, traditional senior housing or assisted living is out of reach.

This trend is especially significant in Clallam County, where the population skews much older than the state overall. According to the U.S. Census, nearly one in three residents (32.5%) is age 65 or older, and almost half (48%) are 55 or older. This means that even small increases in housing costs or medical expenses can push large numbers of seniors into instability. When combined with the rise of fentanyl and other highly addictive substances—which do not spare older populations—the risks are magnified. Seniors who lose housing often face both economic pressures and health challenges at the same time, with very few options available for long-term stability.

Public Safety and Community Strain

Homelessness also intersects with community safety and well-being. Police data shows that property crimes account for more than half of reported offenses in Port Angeles, with substance use a common thread. While the majority of people experiencing homelessness are not engaged in crime, a smaller group battling severe addiction or untreated illness creates recurring incidents. This places added strain not only on law enforcement but also on emergency medical responders, courts, and neighborhood relations.

Beyond the institutions, these pressures affect public perception. Visible encampments, repeat offenders, and strained services fuel frustration, mistrust, and fear. Service providers and volunteers often feel stretched thin, while residents struggle with how to balance compassion and accountability. These dynamics can polarize community dialogue—making it harder to focus on collaborative solutions.

Interconnected Root Causes

Taken together, these root causes show why homelessness is not simply the result of individual choices. It is shaped by systemic pressures—housing costs, health care access, an aging population, generational trauma, and the devastating impact of fentanyl and other addictive substances—all of which reinforce one another.

Economic strain can make a household vulnerable; substance use can compound that vulnerability; generational cycles of trauma can deepen it further. When public safety systems and community trust are also under strain, the path to stability becomes even steeper. Addressing homelessness therefore requires responses that acknowledge its interconnected nature, rather than isolating one factor at a time.

The Human Dimension

Behind every statistic is a person with a story. A senior who can no longer keep up with rent after the death of a spouse. A young adult leaving foster care without a family to fall back on. A worker who lost housing after an unexpected medical bill. A veteran coping with the long-term impacts of trauma.

Some stories reflect resilience in the face of short-term hardship. For example, a family with two small children entered the shelter after losing their home to an unexpected rent increase. With short-term rental assistance, they were able to stabilize and secure new housing within a few months. For them, the safety net worked exactly as intended—bridging a temporary gap and keeping the children out of prolonged homelessness.

Others illustrate the steep climb faced by those with layered challenges. One local man in his early sixties, coping with diabetes and limited mobility, entered the adult shelter after his caregiving spouse passed away. Without family nearby and with limited retirement income, he cycled between the shelter and hospital stays until eventually securing a place in supportive housing. His story shows how losing housing late in life can be devastating, and how complex the path to stability can be.

Youth and young adults bring yet another perspective. In 2024, more than 120 individuals between the ages of 12 and 24 sought help through Serenity House’s youth programs. Some were trying to finish high school while couch-surfing with friends, others were recently out of foster care, and a few were working their first jobs while sleeping in cars. Their needs often go beyond shelter: they require mentoring, access to education, and a sense of belonging to avoid long-term cycles of housing instability.

For some, homelessness is a brief chapter in a larger story. For others, it becomes a recurring struggle. People living with untreated mental illness or addiction often need supportive housing, wraparound services, and long-term recovery options before stability is possible. These layered needs explain why some guests cycle in and out of shelters repeatedly, not because they want to, but because the resources to make their next step permanent simply aren’t available.

The diversity of these experiences underscores an important truth: homelessness is not about “them,” it’s about “us.” It touches seniors on fixed incomes, young people trying to find their footing, families in crisis, and neighbors who once lived stably next door. In a county as small and interconnected as ours, the people experiencing homelessness are not strangers. They are members of our community.

Looking Ahead

The picture that emerges from the data and lived experiences is not simple. Homelessness in Port Angeles is shaped by a tangle of forces—economic pressures, addiction, generational trauma, and the realities of an aging community. Each of these on its own would be daunting; together, they create a challenge that touches nearly every corner of our county.

But naming these realities is not about resignation. It is about clarity. Only by understanding the scope of the problem can we begin to chart meaningful solutions. A clear-eyed view allows us to set aside easy answers or blame, and instead focus on approaches that meet the complexity of the challenge with equal depth and determination.

This first article has aimed to provide that foundation: who is affected, what the numbers show, and the pressures that drive instability. The next installments in this series will explore the helpers who meet these challenges every day, the obstacles they face within strained systems, the intersection of public safety and substance use, the generational cycles of trauma and addiction, and, ultimately, the solutions that are emerging to address homelessness in our community.

By following this journey together, we can move toward a fuller understanding—and toward the compassion, persistence, and cooperation that meaningful change will require.

An Invitation to Join the Conversation

I want to invite you to join in this conversation as we move through the series. Subscribe to stay connected, add your questions and reflections in the comments, and share these stories with others in our community. Whether you’re deeply committed to solving these problems, skeptical about the work being done, or simply curious to understand the issue more fully, your perspective matters here. I’m glad you’re part of this journey, and I look forward to taking the next steps together.

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

The Climate of Conversation

We live in an age when disagreement is easy—and dialogue is rare. Somewhere along the way, our public discourse seems to have traded curiosity for conspiracy, empathy for accusation, and substance for spectacle. We say we want answers, but often what we really want is confirmation of our own beliefs. Not “tell me more,” but “prove me wrong.”

That trade has a cost.

At Clallam County Solutions, I’ve tried to offer a different kind of voice—one that acknowledges complexity, holds space for nuance, and resists the temptation to turn every civic disagreement into a proxy war. Like Arthur Brooks writes in Love Your Enemies, it’s not anger that’s tearing us apart—it’s contempt. The kind of cold dismissal that assumes bad intent before a word is spoken. The kind that says, “I already know who you are, and I’m not here to understand you—I’m here to expose you.”

I’ve seen that spirit up close lately, in ways I’ll speak to more indirectly throughout this piece. What I’ll say here is this: when someone makes a good-faith effort to explain or clarify and is met not with thoughtful engagement, but with sarcasm, suspicion, and shifting accusations, something valuable is lost. Not just the opportunity for connection—but the very fabric of public trust.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Disagreement can be principled. Questions can be sincere. Skepticism can be paired with respect. But it starts with a choice: to see other people not as enemies to outmaneuver, but as neighbors worth listening to—even when we don’t agree.

The Nature of Misinformation (and Its Subtler Forms)

Misinformation isn’t always a blatant lie—it often arrives in subtler forms, woven into implication, innuendo, or strategically framed questions. A 2018 study from the University of Exeter found that even indirect suggestions in media coverage—mere hints of wrongdoing—can significantly increase belief in conspiracy theories. That tells us something important: the framing of what’s said—or what’s left unsaid—can be just as powerful as the facts themselves.

Instead of fabricating evidence, misinformation can arrange true statements to create a false impression. It can weaponize tone, rely on suggestive language, or ask “innocent” questions meant less to uncover answers and more to plant doubt. Over time, these methods wear down trust—not through confrontation, but through corrosion.

Arthur Brooks, in Love Your Enemies, warns of this precise danger:

“We don’t have an anger problem in American politics. We have a contempt problem. … If you listen to how people talk to each other in political life today, you notice it is with pure contempt.”

Contempt isn’t just loud disagreement—it’s the quiet certainty that someone else’s motives are always bad, that nothing they say could be honest, and that your only role is to expose them. It’s a mindset that replaces curiosity with cynicism.

Subscribe now

And that’s where the subtlest forms of misinformation thrive—not in the clear error, but in the strategic omission. When someone asks, “Why haven’t they answered this?” even after they’ve been answered—just not in the way they prefer—that question becomes a narrative device, not a call for clarity. The unsatisfactory answer becomes proof of the conspiracy. The attempt at nuanced dialogue is evidence of something to hide.

We have to be careful not just about what we hear, but how it’s being framed. Because the deeper threat isn’t just in the spread of blatantly false information, it’s in the erosion of our willingness to believe that honest people still exist.

Curiosity Over Judgment

In the face of disagreement or uncertainty, there are two postures we can adopt: curiosity or judgment. Both ask questions; only one is truly seeking answers.

A curious mind engages with the goal of understanding. It asks, “What’s really going on here?” or “What don’t I yet know?” Judgment, on the other hand, tends to ask questions to confirm a suspicion or disprove someone else. It doesn’t open a door, it builds a case.

When we lead with curiosity, something shifts. We become a partner in the conversation, not a prosecutor. We learn things we might not have otherwise considered. And even if we walk away still unsure, we walk away informed—having engaged in good faith, not simply reinforced our own bias.

One of my favorite pop culture reminders of this dynamic comes from Ted Lasso, in a scene where Ted is underestimated by an arrogant rival during a game of darts. Just before throwing the winning shot, he shares a story about being constantly dismissed by others who never bothered to ask questions—who made assumptions instead of listening. Then he delivers the line:

It’s simple advice, but profound. Curiosity opens dialogue. Judgment shuts it down. And when we assume we already know someone’s intentions or character, we close ourselves off from any honest exchange.

Integrity Is Not Performance-Based

It’s hard not to respond when you feel your character is under attack. When someone questions your integrity, especially in public, it cuts deep. For me, integrity isn’t an abstract concept; it’s personal. It’s one of the values I hold most dearly. So when it’s misrepresented or misunderstood, my instinct is to explain. To clarify. To fix the misunderstanding with a desire for good-faith dialogue. One where we both walk away the better for it.

But I’ve learned something over time—something I have to keep reminding myself: not every accusation deserves an answer, and not every question is asked in good faith.

That’s a truth I come back to often. Integrity isn’t performative. It doesn’t depend on whether others acknowledge it. It exists in the quiet spaces—when no one is watching, when no one’s clapping, when you choose to do the right thing because it’s right, not because it will be recognized.

In moments of doubt, I’ve had to trust that the sum of my actions will tell my story. That the people who know me—and who know how I show up in this community—will see the full picture in time. That I can rest at the end of the day not because I’ve convinced everyone, but because I’ve stayed true to what I believe.

That’s the discipline of integrity: not defending it at every turn, but living it consistently enough that it speaks for itself.

Civil Discourse vs. Civic Disconnect

Disagreement isn’t the problem—disconnection is. When rooted in respect and curiosity, even the hardest conversations can lead to something good. The ability to question decisions, challenge assumptions, and hold institutions accountable is foundational to a functioning democracy. But when disagreements diverge from a desire to seek understanding, they become deaf to discourse and uninterested in resolution.

Too often, what we call “discourse” is really something else entirely: performance, provocation, or posturing dressed up as concern. It’s not about learning, it’s about landing a punch. Not about conversation, but about spectacle. And that distinction matters, especially in small communities where trust is as fragile as it is essential.

There’s also a difference between a watchdog and an attack dog. One alerts us to potential danger—allowing time for reflection, context, and thoughtful response. The other simply lunges, assuming threat, interpreting facts in isolation, and acting on conclusions it has already drawn. One seeks to protect the house. The other just wants a target.

There’s an important place in society for people who ask hard questions. There’s also a cost when those questions are loaded with accusation, delivered with contempt, or aimed more at undermining than understanding. That’s where civil discourse begins to break down—and where something far more corrosive begins to take its place.

When every response is met with more suspicion, when clarity is treated as evasion, and when nuance is flattened for the sake of a narrative, what’s lost isn’t just trust in institutions—it’s trust in each other.

We’re seeing more of this disconnect everywhere: online, at public meetings, even in neighborhood conversations. And it’s not because we disagree more—it’s because we listen less, assume worse, and seek resolution less often than we seek validation. That’s not civil discourse. That’s civic disconnection.

Restoring the former means being brave enough to engage without needing to win. To speak without needing to wound. And to listen without needing to control the outcome.

A Recent Interaction: A Cautionary Tale

A while back, I stepped into a conversation believing it was just that, a conversation. The questions were pointed, even skeptical, but I took them seriously. I assumed it came from a similar desire to get to the heart of things.

So I responded. I offered context. I corrected inaccuracies. I gave thoughtful, honest answers—not out of defensiveness, but because I believed clarity was possible. I believed that if I stayed grounded in facts, and engaged respectfully, I would be met in kind.

But as the exchange unfolded, it became clear that understanding wasn’t the goal. No answer seemed sufficient. Each clarification was met not with resolution, but with more suspicion, more performative doubt, more questions already loaded with conclusions. The effort wasn’t to uncover the truth—it was to maintain control of a narrative and generate more misleading content.

That realization stung—not because I expected agreement, but because I had hoped for integrity on both sides. What I encountered instead was a slow drip of dismissal: good-faith answers twisted into fodder for more implication, more drama, more clicks.

Eventually, I had to accept something difficult: not every conversation is really a conversation. Some are stages. Some are scripts. And sometimes, your words are never heard at all, they’re just repurposed to play a part you never agreed to.

Still, I don’t regret trying. I would rather risk being misunderstood than failing to engage in the very civic discourse I am advocating for. Offering truth in good faith is never a mistake. But I’ve also learned that when someone shows you—repeatedly—that they’re not listening, and when dialogue becomes performance, it’s okay to step back. Not in surrender, rather to focus that energy in community solutions and good-faith conversations. Sometimes, there’s more integrity in letting silence hold the line than in explaining yourself to someone committed to misunderstanding.

The Cost of Cynicism—And the Case for Hope

Cynicism feels safe. It feels savvy. It lets us believe we’re too smart to be fooled, too seasoned to be moved, too aware to trust. It has a low barrier of entry; it doesn’t have an upfront cost. It’s the armor of the disappointed and aggrieved, the reflex of those who’ve been let down once too often. And in moments, I understand it. I’ve felt it pull at me too.

But cynicism has a cost.

It corrodes not just our view of others, but our capacity to believe in anything good at all. When we decide that everyone has an angle, that every explanation is an excuse, that every effort is just PR, we don’t just wall ourselves off from manipulation. We wall ourselves off from connection.

Worse still, we begin to punish sincerity. We mock compassion. We treat humility as weakness and mistake caution for deception. And slowly, the people who were trying to do good—imperfectly, but honestly—start to step back. They get quieter. They get tired. And the loudest voices left in the room are the ones least interested in building anything.

And yet—I believe in hope anyway.

Because I’ve seen what happens when people come together not to tear down, but to lift up. I’ve seen neighbors who’ve never met show up for each other. I’ve seen volunteers give their weekends to a cause that won’t benefit them directly at all. I’ve seen ideas spark change—not because they were shouted loudest, but because they were shared with heart and humility.

Hope isn’t naïve. It’s courageous and it’s the well from which change springs. It’s a conscious choice to keep believing in the value of community, the possibility of progress, and the quiet power of integrity—especially when the easy path would be retreat.

Cynicism may feel clever, but hope is what moves the world forward. And I’d rather be occasionally disappointed while working toward something better than sit on the sidelines satisfied with being unimpressed.

A Call to Recommit

It would be easy, after all this, to step back. To grow quiet. To decide that showing up—thoughtfully, vulnerably, imperfectly—isn’t worth the effort. But I believe it still is.

Because the work of community-building doesn’t happen in echo chambers or comment threads. It happens when people choose to participate, not just perform. It happens when we refuse to let cynicism become the default, when we choose service over spectacle, contribution over critique.

That’s what I’m trying to do with Clallam County Solutions—not to present a perfect worldview or push a single ideology, but to offer space for context, complexity, and constructive ideas. A space where people can think more deeply, ask better questions, and see past the surface-level noise.

I don’t pretend to have all the answers. But I do know this: the health of a community is shaped in part by how we treat those who are trying. Not those who claim certainty in every answer, but those who keep showing up—even when it’s messy—because they care enough to try.

So here’s my recommitment: I will continue to write. I will continue to serve. I will continue to believe that listening matters, that values matter, and that local voices—real, honest, solution-seeking voices—deserve a place in the conversation.

Because our communities are worth the effort. And hope, as ever, is still a better bet than contempt.

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Beyond Recompete: A Community Conversation About Shaping Our Regional Future

Every so often, a rare opportunity presents itself—one that challenges us to rise above business-as-usual and reimagine what’s possible for our region. That’s exactly what happened last week when dozens of leaders from Clallam and Jefferson Counties gathered at Peninsula College for a wide-ranging public meeting titled “Beyond Recompete: Shaping Our Regional Future.”

The event was more than a typical economic development update. It was a chance to build shared understanding around two major, coordinated federal investments: a $34 million grant awarded through the Recompete Pilot Program to support workforce development and economic revitalization across Clallam and Jefferson Counties, and an additional $5.1 million grant focused on forest products innovation, overseen by the Clallam EDC and the Natural Resources Innovation Center (NRIC). Together, these nearly $40 million in competitive federal funds represent a once-in-a-generation opportunity. But that opportunity raises big questions: How can we transform these dollars into good, lasting jobs for people who’ve been left behind by past economic shifts? What real-world barriers must we confront? And most importantly, how do we make sure this moment leads to durable, inclusive progress—not just for a few, but for many?

Over the course of several hours, elected officials, business owners, educators, nonprofit leaders, and everyday residents came together to learn, share concerns, and brainstorm ideas. And while the challenges are real, so too is the shared resolve: that with focused strategy, community buy-in, and a bias toward action, we can raise wages, create opportunity, and build a more resilient, thriving North Olympic Peninsula.

This article breaks down what was discussed—starting with the goals of the Recompete grant and the big-picture vision that inspired our region’s successful application. From there, we’ll explore the projects being funded, the sectors being targeted, and the barriers we’ll need to tackle together in order to deliver on the promise of this historic investment.

A Once-in-a-Generation Chance to Catch Up—and Pull Ahead

To understand the significance of the Recompete meeting, it helps to understand the grant itself—where it came from, what it targets, and why our region was chosen.

The Recompete Pilot Program is one of the most ambitious federal economic development efforts in recent memory. Created by the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), its goal is to help economically distressed communities reconnect to good jobs and long-term opportunity. Unlike scattershot programs of the past, Recompete is place-based and deeply targeted, aiming to close one specific gap: the prime-age employment rate for people between the ages of 25 and 54.

It’s a metric that tells a powerful story. Over the past several decades, communities like ours—rural, resource-based, and largely left out of post-industrial prosperity—have steadily fallen behind the national average in terms of workforce participation and income. That trend has real consequences, including persistent poverty, housing instability, and diminished hope for the next generation. Recompete was designed to help reverse that.

Out of over 600 applicants nationwide, the North Olympic Peninsula (Clallam and Jefferson Counties) was one of only six regions awarded a full Recompete grant in the program’s first round. The coalition behind the application—made up of local governments, tribes, ports, workforce organizations, and nonprofits—made a compelling case: our communities are ready, willing, and organized to build a more inclusive and prosperous economy, if given the tools to do so.

Over the next five years, roughly $40 million will be deployed here under the Recompete umbrella. The goal is ambitious: to connect 900 currently unemployed residents to high-wage jobs, especially in sectors like construction, manufacturing, maritime, and forest products. These are fields with deep roots on the Peninsula—industries that once sustained generations, and could again with the right mix of innovation, training, and support.

But as meeting participants emphasized, funding is only the first step. True success will depend on shared vision, strategic alignment, and a commitment to confront long-standing barriers with fresh thinking and broad community support.

Building a Better Economy—By Design, Not Default

Behind every major investment is a set of choices. For the Recompete coalition that brought this grant to the Olympic Peninsula, the goal wasn’t just to bring in money—it was to design a system that would create lasting, meaningful change for real people.

At the heart of the coalition’s strategy is a clear outcome: help 900 prime-age residents (ages 25–54) who are currently unemployed move into high-wage, high-opportunity careers. But reaching that target isn’t just about creating job listings—it’s about removing the structural and personal barriers that prevent people from stepping into those jobs in the first place.

To that end, the coalition organized its approach around four guiding principles:

1. Short Pathways to Success
   With only five years to deploy the funds, the focus is on accessible, fast-tracked training opportunities: certificate programs, two-year degrees, and direct on-the-job training. The aim is to support individuals who don’t have the time or resources to pursue a traditional four-year degree but are ready to enter the workforce quickly if given the right support.

2. Industrial Focus Rooted in Place
   Rather than chasing speculative industries, the strategy zeroes in on sectors that already have deep roots here—manufacturing, maritime, and forest products. These are fields with room for innovation and strong potential for good wages. Narrowing the focus also creates synergy between projects, aligning job training, infrastructure, and business growth around common goals.

3. Infrastructure and Innovation
   Job training only works if the jobs exist. That’s why the Recompete plan includes direct investment in new business development, transportation upgrades, and production capacity. From barging networks to advanced timber product manufacturing, the coalition is working to create the physical and economic infrastructure needed to support long-term growth.

4. Spreading the Impact Across the Region
   From Forks to Port Townsend, rural areas often face the greatest challenges—and the fewest resources. The coalition made it a point to equitably distribute investments across communities, ensuring the benefits of Recompete don’t stop at city limits. A mobile training unit, for instance, will bring hands-on workforce programs directly into remote areas.

This approach isn’t about handouts. It’s about restoring access, agency, and opportunity in places where they’ve been lost—not with a one-size-fits-all fix, but through community-informed strategies designed to meet people where they are.

Turning Strategy Into Action: Six Projects, One Shared Vision

A strong vision only matters if it leads to real-world impact—and that’s where the Recompete investment becomes concrete. To operationalize its goals, the North Olympic Peninsula coalition identified six major projects designed to work together like interlocking gears. Each plays a specific role in removing barriers, creating jobs, and building momentum—especially in the sectors that can support a more resilient local economy.

Here’s how the $34 million core Recompete investment breaks down:

1. Olympic Peninsula Resource Hub (“Olympic Connect”) — $10M

Lead: Olympic Community of Health | Partner: YMCA

This is the backbone of the entire effort: a coordinated, person-centered system for removing the real-life obstacles that keep people out of the workforce. Think transportation, housing instability, or a lack of internet access—any of these can be a deal-breaker for someone trying to improve their life.

Through a network of navigators and a flexible voucher support program managed by the YMCA, “Olympic Connect” will help people access the services they need while staying on track toward a stable, living-wage job.

2. Workforce Development Program — $6.9M

Lead: Peninsula College

This initiative will build out training programs aligned with maritime, manufacturing, and forest products, while also expanding mobile learning opportunities to reach residents in rural communities. It includes both new programs and upgrades to existing ones, with an emphasis on short-term, stackable credentials that lead directly to employment.

Notably, the program will include mobile training units—semi-trailers outfitted for on-site welding and marine trades education—that can travel to remote areas.

3. Peninsula Barging Network — $6M

Lead: Port of Port Angeles

Logistics matter—and on the Olympic Peninsula, transportation costs can be a major barrier to economic growth. This project aims to solve that by launching a new regional barging network to make shipping goods more affordable, efficient, and environmentally friendly.

Three barges will be purchased, enabling businesses to move materials without relying solely on overburdened road systems. The long-term vision is to reduce costs for local manufacturers while unlocking access to broader markets.

4. CRTC Thermal Modular Manufacturing — (Cost: Modest, Impact: Major)

Lead: Composite Recycling Technology Center (CRTC)
Partner: Makah Tribe

This small but mighty project turns local timber into innovative modular housing panels—a high-tech product with local supply chains and national demand. Using underutilized coastal wood species harvested by the Makah Tribe, CRTC will create prefabricated components that can be used for affordable accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and emergency housing.

It’s a model for value-added forest product innovation: low environmental impact, high community benefit, and a direct pipeline to skilled manufacturing jobs.

5. Remote & Rural Communities Development — $8.5M

Lead: North Olympic Development Council

This project allocates flexible funds across multiple rural communities, allowing them to customize investments based on local needs—whether that’s job training, childcare, housing access, or direct business support.

Each subregion will be able to chart its own course within the Recompete framework, ensuring equity in both strategy and outcomes.

6. Recompete Coalition Governance & Data Infrastructure — $3.2M

Lead: Clallam County

Coordinating a region-wide, multi-agency effort like this isn’t simple. This project provides staffing, data systems, and convening support to ensure accountability, transparency, and follow-through over the five-year lifespan of the grant.

It also ensures the effort continues to be community-driven—not just in spirit, but in day-to-day decision-making.

Taken together, these projects represent far more than a collection of good ideas. They’re a cohesive ecosystem—each part supporting the others, all tied to the same ambitious but achievable goal: connect 900 people to meaningful, life-changing employment while strengthening the economic foundation of the entire region.

Up next: we’ll explore the local realities—the wage data, demographic shifts, and economic pressures—that make this effort not just worthwhile, but essential.

Why It Matters: The Economic Crossroads We’re Standing At

Clallam and Jefferson Counties are no strangers to economic hardship. For decades, our region has weathered the slow erosion of industries that once provided stable, family-wage jobs—from timber mills and boatyards to pulp manufacturing and more. While the natural beauty of the North Olympic Peninsula has attracted retirees and remote workers in recent years, this shift has not lifted wages or revitalized the local economy for working residents. In many ways, it has done the opposite.

As Colleen McAleer of the Clallam Economic Development Council laid out during the meeting, our average annual wages are now only 60% of the state average, compared to 85% a generation ago. Clallam’s average hovers just above $52,000, and Jefferson County is only marginally higher. For comparison, King County’s average exceeds $120,000, skewing state-level policymaking and highlighting the disconnect between rural and urban economic realities.

Even more striking: over one-third of all jobs in Clallam County are in government (including healthcare), compared to the state average of 10%. That’s not because government employment exploded—it’s because the private-sector job base has withered. Meanwhile, base industries—those that bring outside dollars into the region, like manufacturing and export-related businesses—have steadily declined.

Retirement & Remote Work: Not a Fix

Retirees and remote workers have brought some spending power, but most of their dollars go toward lower-wage, non-basic services like retail, food service, or personal care. These jobs may be plentiful, but they don’t pay enough to support a family—or to justify new multifamily housing investment, which developers consistently say is hampered by low median incomes and lack of wage growth.

This is part of the cycle Recompete is meant to interrupt. Without strategic intervention, projections show our counties could slide even further—to just 50% of the state wage average within a decade.

Why These Industries?

That’s why the Recompete plan targets sectors that:

• Exist locally and don’t need to be built from scratch.

• Offer high-wage employment with lower barriers to entry.

• Can grow sustainably in our region’s economic and geographic context.

The top four sectors identified:

• Construction (15% of Clallam’s businesses are solo construction contractors)

• Manufacturing (especially wood products and innovative fabrication)

• Maritime (with strong potential but hard to measure under NAICS codes)

• Forest Products (including new models like value-added modular housing)

These sectors already have a foothold in our region, with strong potential to expand and support long-term economic stability. When grown thoughtfully, they not only create new jobs—they anchor a more self-sufficient and resilient regional economy.

The goal isn’t to exclude other fields like healthcare or retail. But as McAleer emphasized, if we want to increase wealth, attract housing investment, and support long-term stability, we have to focus on basic industries that generate new income—not just circulate existing dollars.

What Success Looks Like: Voices From the Room

As the Recompete vision shifts from planning to implementation, the heart of the strategy will depend on more than funding formulas and project plans. It will depend on people—employers, educators, nonprofit leaders, and residents—pulling together to turn possibility into progress. That’s why the “Beyond Recompete” meeting devoted much of its time to open, candid community dialogue.

What emerged was both inspiring and sobering.

“Our young people won’t leave.”

When asked what success would look like—if 900 good jobs were created and filled by current residents—several themes came up again and again: hope, retention of local youth, better health outcomes, stronger families, and improved morale.

“Our young people won’t leave,” said Wendy Sisk, CEO of Peninsula Behavioral Health. “If they have more stability in their home lives, then they’ll feel more hopeful about their futures.” She added, “We should also see better health outcomes—people can afford to eat better, afford quality food. That matters.”

Commissioner Randy Johnson echoed this multiplier effect: “A rising tide lifts all ships… It takes care of the whole medical issue. It takes care of child care. It takes care of the myriad of other things we have.”

Several others described the emotional weight of economic struggle. Phyllis Bernhardt, PUD Commissioner, described it plainly: “When people are able to see some of the promises made actually being kept… that improves morale.” She added, “We can do this. We can go forward.”

“We need more than training—we need the jobs to go with it.”

There was widespread enthusiasm for the workforce programs being developed, but many participants urged equal emphasis on job creation—especially in the private sector. “We need 900 more jobs,” said Sisk. “Peninsula College can do all the training in the world, but if employers don’t step up, we won’t meet the goal.”

This concern was echoed by a local builder, who pointed out that many local tradespeople are aging out. “The average age of the trade workers you’re targeting is too high. We’ve got to lower that by 10 to 12 years. That means reaching students in high school and making trades training more accessible and appealing.”

“You don’t get out of this without private capital.”

While most of the meeting focused on barriers for individuals, others called out systemic obstacles to growth for local businesses. Randy Johnson, again wearing his “private business hat,” offered a clear reminder: “One of the biggest issues to expansion is financing. I won’t say we’re redlined, but we’re not a preferred area.”

The question of how to attract or support local investment, rather than depending solely on outside corporations, came up multiple times. From permits to infrastructure to startup capital, several speakers noted the uphill battle faced by local builders, manufacturers, and entrepreneurs who want to grow but lack clear pathways to do so.

As Bruce Emery, Director of Community Development, put it: “We get a lot of companies wanting to move here, but there isn’t the large acreage of adequately zoned property. And infrastructure? That’s expensive—and only gets more expensive.”

“If we do this right, we’re going to change the economic trajectory of this region.”

Throughout the session, a repeated refrain kept surfacing: this can work, but only if the whole community buys in. That means schools. Employers. Cities. Nonprofits. And everyday residents who can champion the effort as it unfolds.

Port Commissioner Paul Jarkiewicz asked it plainly: “How many of you here are ambassadors for this work?” After a long pause, most hands in the room went up. “It should be everyone,” he said. “You’re here for a reason.”

As Commissioner Mike French closed out the session, he reflected on what’s at stake. “This might be one of the most important things I’ll ever do,” he said. “We won’t solve every problem. But if we do this right, we can solve some of the biggest ones—and change real lives in the process.”

What’s in the Way? Identifying—and Tackling—Our Region’s Biggest Barriers

If the Recompete initiative is the blueprint for a better local economy, then the conversation in the room made one thing clear: we’re still clearing the site. While participants expressed strong support for the plan’s vision, they also painted a vivid picture of the challenges that could derail it—unless addressed directly, creatively, and collaboratively.

Here’s a breakdown of the most urgent barriers identified during the meeting, along with key insights from those in the room.

1. Transportation

Whether it was getting to training, accessing a job site, or bringing goods to market, transportation was named again and again as a limiting factor—especially in rural communities and on tribal lands.

A representative from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation noted that “the two biggest hurdles for our customer base… are transportation and broadband access. Especially on the reservations.”

Commissioner Mike French summed it up: “We can’t train people for jobs they can’t get to.” That’s one reason the Recompete plan includes mobile training trailers and vouchers for car repairs or gas through Olympic Connect. But participants agreed: more is needed, especially in the form of long-term transit solutions and freight infrastructure improvements.

2. Child Care

The phrase “child care desert” came up more than once.

Several speakers emphasized that the lack of affordable, accessible child care isn’t just a family issue—it’s a workforce issue. One participant added, “Let’s say you want to recruit someone for a high-wage job—if they can’t find child care, they can’t take the job.”

The Recompete program will offer financial support for child care through vouchers, but as Commissioner French noted: “We have funding to support child care access. We don’t have funding to create new child care.” That gap remains a critical concern for community-wide success.

3. Permit Reform and Land Use Constraints

From zoning to infrastructure to building regulations, local businesses shared their frustrations with development timelines and regulatory hurdles.

Bruce Emery, Director of Community Development in Clallam County, acknowledged the challenge: “We don’t have the large acreage of adequately zoned property needed for manufacturing growth. Infrastructure is expensive, and land use changes are hard to make.”

Others pushed for a cultural shift in how permitting departments see themselves. “They have a chance to be heroes,” said French. “To unlock business potential. We need to help staff understand that.” There was widespread agreement that business development deserves the same regulatory urgency that housing has started to receive.

4. Financial Literacy & Business Capacity

Local entrepreneurs, particularly in the trades, face steep learning curves when trying to scale.

One attendee shared the story of a contractor who “lost $80,000 his first year trying to hire employees because he didn’t understand labor costs or taxes.” Others called for more financial education and mentorship—not just for job seekers, but for solo business owners looking to expand.

As someone in the audience noted, “If we’re trying to create 900 jobs, we’ll need 100 business owners to hire nine people each. But many don’t have the systems or knowledge to scale sustainably.”

5. Mental Health & Soft Skills

Especially among those disconnected from the workforce for years, participants stressed that job training alone isn’t enough.

“We need to help people rebuild confidence,” said one of the participants, who described seeing a widespread sense of hopelessness: “People have grown up here thinking they’ll never get ahead. They don’t believe things can change.”

Wendy Sisk added, “People living in economic stress often struggle with depression. That affects everything—from showing up to work to pursuing training to believing in a different future.”

Others pointed to the need for teaching basic employment habits, such as punctuality, communication, and reliability—“things you can’t always learn from a certificate program.”

6. Data Access & Tracking

To meet its targets, the Recompete coalition will need to track outcomes meticulously—but accessing usable data isn’t always easy.

The state has strict confidentiality rules. “You can’t get the raw data,” said Colleen McAleer. “You have to hire WSU, and they’ll interpret it for you—for $100,000.”

Even identifying the right participants has proven complex. The region is short about 2,700 prime-age workers compared to national averages—but finding those individuals, understanding their needs, and helping them step forward requires a deliberate outreach strategy through trusted partners like Olympic Connect.

A Clear Message: This Must Be a “Both/And” Effort

Throughout the discussion, one idea kept surfacing: we can’t just train workers or just attract businesses—we must do both, at the same time.

“Training people for jobs that don’t exist won’t help,” said Wendy Sisk. “And hiring people who are already working elsewhere won’t lift the people we’re trying to reach.” The Recompete model depends on aligning those two paths—growing industries while opening the door wider to those previously shut out.

Beyond the Grant: What It Will Take to Make This Moment Count

If one message rang loud and clear by the end of the “Beyond Recompete” meeting, it was this: money alone won’t solve our region’s problems. People will. Every person in the room—whether from government, education, industry, or community-based organizations—was called to action, not just in principle, but in practice.

So what exactly needs to happen next?

Cities and Counties: Make Room for Growth

From zoning to permitting to infrastructure, multiple speakers emphasized that local governments need to treat business development with the same urgency and coordination they’ve recently shown around housing.

“Let’s roll out the red carpet,” said Colleen McAleer, “not just for a behavioral health center—though that’s incredibly important—but also for a company bringing in 100 or 200 high-wage jobs.” She and others urged municipalities to audit their regulations to identify barriers that can be streamlined or eliminated altogether.

Bruce Emery from the City of Port Angeles noted that planning updates are already underway: “We're in the middle of our comprehensive plan right now, and we're asking our community how they want to address these needs. We’re listening.”

Schools and Colleges: Reach Earlier, Train Faster

While Peninsula College was praised for its commitment to job-ready programs, there was widespread support for deepening the link between K–12 schools and trades pathways.

“We’re already seeing fewer high school graduates go directly into four-year degrees,” David Bigham, school superintendent of the Crescent School District. “But they need more than interest—they need courage, support, and mental health resources to believe they can succeed.”

Others noted the importance of reviving hands-on learning in public education. “Pacific Education Institute has been trying to bring this to our schools,” said one of the attendees, referencing maritime and natural resource career curriculum, “but it’s been tough without funding.”

Employers: Hire Creatively and Support Scaling

Many participants recognized that meeting the 900-job goal will require employers to take chances on people with unconventional or interrupted work histories. That might mean offering internships, supporting mentorship, or being more flexible in hiring practices.

“We have to stop poaching from each other,” said a longtime business owner Bill Hermann. “Every time I hire a trained worker from another company, they’re now short—and we haven’t solved the problem.”

Chris from PNNL, who’s overseeing a $40 million local expansion, said it plainly: “We can’t even find local companies to bid our contracts. We need to grow local capacity or we’ll keep importing workers from Bremerton.”

The solution? Invest in local business growth, not just workforce pipelines. One participant urged the group to “find and support the one-person shops who want to scale—but don’t know how.”

Communities: Say Yes to Opportunity

The meeting also addressed an underlying cultural barrier: the ambivalence or resistance that sometimes meets new business proposals—especially those that bring outside capital or unfamiliar industries.

“We want to grow existing businesses first,” said McAleer. “But we also have to be open to new employers who align with our values and bring high-wage jobs.”

Others called out the need for public support when new projects come to town. “We can’t keep saying we want jobs, and then block development at every step,” one speaker said. “We need to create an environment where industry feels welcome.”

Everyone: Be an Ambassador

The most personal challenge came from Port Commissioner Paul Jarkiewicz, who asked a simple question: “How many people here are ambassadors for everything we’ve talked about today?”

After a pause, hands slowly went up.

“It should be everyone,” he said. “This doesn’t work unless we all carry the message forward—to our boards, our staff, our friends, and our neighborhoods.”

Commissioner Mike French echoed that sentiment in his closing remarks. “This might be one of the most important things I’ll ever work on,” he said. “We need every person in this room, and every person beyond it, to think hard about what their role is—and then show up. Because if we do this right, we’re not just meeting a grant goal. We’re changing the trajectory of our region.”

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

I am honored to serve as the Vice President of the Board of Directors for Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County. The article below draws from my personal knowledge and passion for the organization, but it is important to clarify that this piece is not an official publication of Habitat for Humanity. It reflects my individual perspective and has been enriched by input from the organization, yet it remains a personal initiative rather than an organizational statement. My hope is to provide valuable insights into this remarkable organization's mission, work, and impact.

Welcome: A Closer Look at Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County

We live in a time when headlines are loud, assumptions spread quickly, and simple truths can get lost in the shuffle. That’s why we’re inviting you to take a step closer—to go beyond the soundbites and social‑media chatter and spend a little time getting to know us: what we do, how we do it, and why it matters.

At Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, we’ve been building more than just homes for over 30 years—we’ve been building stability, dignity, and opportunity for families across our region. And now, as we grow to meet the increasingly urgent need for affordable housing in our community, we want to do so with openness, clarity, and open arms.

This article is our invitation to you. Whether you’re a longtime supporter, a curious neighbor, or someone hearing about us for the first time, we hope you’ll take this opportunity to learn more about who we are and what we stand for.

Here’s what you can expect as you read:

• Mission & Structure – We begin by grounding ourselves in our mission and explaining how Habitat for Humanity operates both globally and locally—what we share with affiliates around the world, and how our work in Clallam County is tailored to the unique needs of our community.

• The Homeownership Model – We’ll walk you through how our homeownership model actually works to clear up some common misconceptions and show you what it truly means to partner with Habitat Clallam to own a home.

• Beyond New Homes – You’ll learn that Habitat is about more than new homes. From critical repairs and accessibility updates to veteran housing and workforce development, we’ll show you how we serve in ways that often go unseen but make a deep impact.

• Funding – We’ll share how this work is funded—from our Store revenue to private donations and public grants—and explain clearly how we responsibly grow and use the resources entrusted to us.

• Scaling Up – You’ll get an inside look at why we’re scaling up, including the challenges and decisions behind projects like Lyon’s Landing and the pivots we’ve made in response to changing conditions.

• Building Stronger Connections – We’ll share how Habitat is working to strengthen relationships across the community, including a first‑of‑its‑kind Native American Housing Liaison program designed to foster understanding and partnership with local tribes.

• Governance & Proactive Communication – We’ll take time to talk openly about how we operate, how decisions are made, and why some details take time to share—not because we want to hide, but because we want to get it right.

• Common Questions Answered – Along the way, we’ll address and clarify some of the public’s questions, while modeling the honesty, respect, and community spirit that guides all our work.

• The Bigger Picture – And finally, we’ll zoom out to talk about why this work matters so deeply—how homeownership transforms lives and how each of us has a role to play in creating a more stable, compassionate, and affordable future for everyone in Clallam County.

This is not just a story about Habitat—it’s a story about what we can build when we build together. So whether you’re here to better understand, to get involved, or to hold us accountable, we welcome you. Let’s go on this journey together.

A Simple Mission in a Complicated World

In a world often defined by complexity, conflict, and contradiction, the vision of Habitat for Humanity remains refreshingly simple: a world where everyone has a decent place to live. That’s it—just one line, but one that carries the weight of generations of struggle, resilience, and hope. It’s the kind of statement that cuts through the noise and offers insight into what’s possible when communities come together not just to build homes, but to build better futures.

At Habitat Clallam, this vision is more than a slogan—it’s the blueprint for every board meeting, home design, volunteer shift, and difficult decision. It’s the reason we believe in showing up—sometimes with hammers, sometimes with open ears, and always with open hearts.

But we know that building homes also means building trust. And in recent months our work has prompted questions about funding, partnerships, equity, and growth. Some of those questions have been asked in public forums; others have come through quiet phone calls, thoughtful conversations at community events, or heartfelt comments from supporters who simply want to understand how we do what we do. All of them matter.

Because the truth is, the public has every right to ask questions, and as a community-based nonprofit, we have a responsibility to respond openly, compassionately, and with integrity. That means embracing difficult conversations alongside inspiring ones, sharing context, facts, and stories—not spin—and choosing to lead with openness and trust, even when it might seem easier to simply issue statements or remain silent.

So in the paragraphs ahead, we’d like to open a real, honest conversation about who we are, how we operate, and what we’re working toward. You won’t find perfect people or simple answers here—but you will find a community doing its best to meet a rising need with courage and creativity.

You’ll read about how Habitat Clallam’s model actually works—from family selection to sweat equity, from homeownership requirements to long‑term affordability protections. You’ll see the impact of the work—not just in the number of houses built, but in the lives changed and the neighborhoods strengthened. And you’ll learn about the questions we’re facing, including the most controversial ones, and how we’re striving to address them with clarity and fairness.

Most of all, we hope you come away with a clearer picture of what Habitat is really about: not politics, not profit, not perfection—but hardworking people, committed to rolling up their sleeves and building better futures, one family at a time. Because we believe safe, stable, affordable housing is not a luxury, but instead the foundation for everything else.

This is our mission. This is our heart. And we’re grateful you’re here to be part of the conversation.

What is Habitat for Humanity? Local Roots, Global Reach

When people hear “Habitat for Humanity,” they often picture volunteers raising the walls of a house—hammer in hand, joy on their faces. That image isn’t wrong, but it only scratches the surface. Habitat is both bigger and more personal than that. It’s a global movement with a deeply local heartbeat—an organization that spans continents, but also shows up on your street.

At the global level, Habitat for Humanity International (HFHI) is a nonprofit housing ministry working in more than 70 countries and all 50 U.S. states. Its foundational belief is simple and unwavering: that every single person deserves a safe, decent, and affordable place to live. Rooted in Christian values, HFHI welcomes people of all faiths—and of no faith at all—into its work, and maintains a strict non-proselytizing policy. Assistance is never conditional on belief, and the goal is never conversion; it’s community.

HFHI supports its affiliates by offering training, developing policies and standards, and advocating at national and international levels for systemic change in housing access. Through global initiatives like the Cost of Home campaign, HFHI works to address housing insecurity not only by building homes, but by influencing the systems that make homeownership out of reach for millions. Its focus on advocacy, equity, and partnership extends far beyond construction sites—it aims to transform how the world thinks about shelter.

But the real magic happens locally. That’s where affiliates like Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County (HFHCC) come in.

Founded in 1991 in Sequim as Dungeness Valley Habitat for Humanity, the organization expanded and restructured in 2006 to become Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County. HFHCC is an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit, governed by a local board of directors, managed by a dedicated local staff, and funded primarily through local donations, business partnerships, grants, and Store sales.

That autonomy is intentional. HFHCC sets its own strategic direction and chooses how best to serve the unique needs of the communities that span Clallam County—from Forks to Sequim to Port Angeles. Over the years, HFHCC has built over 40 homes and completed dozens of critical repairs for families living in unsafe or deteriorating housing. We’ve grown not just in size, but in scope—expanding our services to include aging-in-place modifications for seniors, outreach to veterans, and financial education for all our homeowner partners.

We’re proud to be part of the larger Habitat movement, but we’re even prouder of what we’ve built here at home: a locally-rooted organization that listens to its community, evolves to meet local challenges, and invests every dollar, every hour, and every decision back into Clallam County.

Habitat’s structure—global in vision, local in execution—is part of what makes it so effective. It allows for innovation while remaining grounded. It brings in national resources while honoring local relationships. And it ensures that, even while we’re part of a worldwide effort to address housing insecurity, our work always starts with one simple question: What does our community need—and how can we help build it together?

The Habitat Homeownership Model: Facts Over Assumptions

If you’ve heard Habitat for Humanity “gives homes away,” you’re not alone. It’s one of the most common misunderstandings we encounter—and one of the most important to correct.

The truth is, Habitat homes are not free. Families who partner with Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County (HFHCC) buy their homes - just like any other homeowner. The difference is that they do so through an affordable, supportive pathway designed for those who would otherwise be locked out of traditional homeownership.

To qualify, a family must fall within specific income guidelines—generally at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI), as defined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. That means our homes are not for those who can easily access market-rate housing; they’re for working individuals and families who are doing everything right but are still priced out of a place to call their own.

Once selected, these families aren’t simply handed the keys. They are asked to make a significant investment—not only financially, but also physically and emotionally. Every adult (18 years or older) in the household commits to completing at least 250 hours of “sweat equity”—a term that reflects the time they spend working on their own homes, volunteering at our Stores, assisting other Habitat families, and completing training in financial literacy, home maintenance, and responsible homeownership.

This process is designed to reduce construction costs and to build homeownership confidence and skills in the families we serve. These are not families that need rescuing, and Habitat Clallam’s goal is empowering those we partner with.

When construction is complete, partner families still purchase their homes with an affordable first mortgage—kept at or below 30 percent of their household income—and they still gain the pride and power of true ownership. Traditionally, Habitat Clallam has closed the remaining affordability gap by holding a “silent second” mortgage: a no‑interest, no‑payment lien that sits quietly in the background until the home is refinanced or sold. This model allows families to build equity and generational wealth—something that is often out of reach for those trapped in the rental cycle.

Yet we know the landscape is changing—and so must we. On our most recent builds, the silent‑second amounts have climbed to $60,000 – $100,000 per home. Looking ahead to larger developments like Lyon’s Landing in Carlsborg (45 homes), that approach would tie up more than $3.6 million in deferred loans—resources that could otherwise fund additional houses or critical‑repair projects.

So, while silent seconds remain part of our toolkit today, we’re actively exploring new ways to keep homes affordable without over‑leveraging Habitat’s balance sheet. Chief Executive Officer Colleen Robinson and our finance team are researching third‑party down‑payment‑assistance (DPA) programs and other creative partnerships that could provide the same relief to future homeowners without placing every dollar of that subsidy on Habitat’s books. These solutions aren’t finalized yet—but they’re a glimpse of how we’re always adapting, innovating, and learning to serve more families, more sustainably, for years to come.

But what happens when housing prices rise? Could a Habitat homeowner "flip" their home for profit?

That’s where Habitat’s long-term affordability safeguards come in. Homes are structured with a vesting schedule, meaning that homeowners earn their equity over time. If a home is sold in the early years, a greater portion of the value stays with Habitat, which can then reinvest those funds to build more homes. Additionally, Habitat retains the right of first refusal, meaning we can repurchase the home to keep it in the program and ensure it goes to another family in need. These protections are not about limiting a family’s success, they’re about preserving affordability and paying opportunity forward.

In this way, the Habitat model balances individual empowerment with community responsibility. We’ve seen families go from living in unsafe or overcrowded conditions to becoming stable, invested members of their neighborhoods. Parents gain peace of mind, children thrive in school, and the cycle of poverty begins to break, just through the opportunity of affordable housing.

How Families Are Selected: A Process Rooted in Fairness and Need

At Habitat Clallam, choosing which families to partner with is one of the most important decisions we make, and one of the most thoughtful. Each selection represents not just the future of a home, but the future of a family. And we take that responsibility seriously.

The Habitat homeownership process begins with an open application period for eligible Clallam County residents. Applicants must fall within income guidelines, with household income at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI), have an appropriate credit score, and confirm their capacity to repay an affordable mortgage. Habitat assesses applicants based on three specific criteria to establish the level of their housing need: households that are cost-burdened by spending more than 30% of their income on housing, families doubling up—meaning two families living in one dwelling—and those living in inadequate conditions, such as homes with mold, leaky roofs, infestations, or poor insulation causing drafts. This thorough evaluation ensures support is directed to those most in need of decent, stable housing.

Once applications are received, our Family Services staff conducts detailed interviews and home visits to better understand the family’s current circumstances. Applicants are also evaluated for their willingness to partner, which includes a commitment to complete sweat equity hours, attend homeowner education classes, and participate actively in their home’s construction.

But here’s what makes our process uniquely fair and equitable: when all the information is gathered, personal identifying details are removed from the applications before they are presented to the Board of Directors for final selection. The Board reviews each family’s needs and qualifications without knowing their names, faces, race, religion, or background. This blind-review process ensures that families are chosen based solely on merit and need, not bias or favoritism.

The reality of this need was clearly illustrated during our recent selection process for the 14th and final home built at Maloney Heights in Port Angeles. For just one modest home—1,000 square feet with three bedrooms, one bathroom, no garage, and a small yard—we received 25 applications. Most of these applicants were families—mothers, fathers, children, and often pets—living crowded together in travel trailers on friends' or family members' properties. This snapshot highlights the pressing demand and underscores why our work to expand affordable housing options is so crucial.

It’s a model rooted in dignity. We don’t just serve families—we partner with them. And our selection process reflects that philosophy: one that prioritizes fairness, openness, partnership, commitment, and hope.

More Than Just Homes: Habitat’s Broader Community Impact

When most people think of Habitat for Humanity, they picture homes being built from the ground up—framed by volunteers in hard hats, working side-by-side with future homeowners. And while that remains at the heart of what we do, it’s far from the whole story.

Because at Habitat Clallam, we’ve learned that stability doesn’t begin and end at a front door. Sometimes, the most profound impact we can make comes not from constructing something new, but from preserving what’s already there.

That’s why we offer programs like Critical Home Repairs and Aging in Place. These services ensure seniors, disabled residents, and low-income homeowners can remain safely and securely in the homes they already own. These aren’t cosmetic improvements. They’re life-changing interventions: installing ramps where stairs once created barriers, replacing unsafe steps or rotting decks, making bathrooms accessible, or repairing leaking roofs that threatened long-term health and habitability.

One of our clients, Rosie, put it best: “No wonder President Jimmy Carter [worked with] Habitat. Everyone involved was SO kind, like him. And what a smooth, effortless process for me! As an elder, my future has been made more secure by the generosity of this program. Beyond grateful.”

Rosie isn’t alone. Another homeowner, Joy, confined to a wheelchair, beamed about the her new deck built by Habitat Clallam. The old deck had rotted to the point that frequent healthcare visitors felt unsure about using it to access her home. After it was completed, Joy happily reported: “Oh my gosh, the deck is now so smooth I could just skate! They [Habitat Clallam] did really good work; each of the nurses and caregivers who come by just gush about how nice it is!”

These moments might seem small from the outside—but to the people living them, they are monumental. They represent safety, freedom, dignity, and reassurance. And they’re a vital part of our broader mission: ensuring that everyone — not just new homeowners — has a decent place to live.

Habitat Clallam’s reach goes beyond home preservation. As the county continues to face a housing affordability crisis, we’ve committed ourselves to meeting emerging needs head-on. That includes expanding into workforce housing, so that the teachers, healthcare workers, caregivers, and service employees, who form the backbone of our economy, can afford to live in the community they serve.

And it includes special outreach to those who have long been underserved—like our Veterans Build program, which offers tailored support and construction resources to help veterans access safe, affordable housing. We believe that honoring service shouldn’t end when a uniform comes off. Stable housing is one of the most powerful ways we can continue to support those who have sacrificed so much.

These efforts are rooted not just in strategy, but in stories.

Stories like Melissa’s, a Habitat homeowner who shared, “I am a living testimonial to how community connection and support can drastically improve someone’s quality of life.”

Or Steve’s, who said simply, “Having a place we can truly call home, where we can enjoy time with our family, means the world to us.”

Or Molly’s, who said what so many of us long to feel: “Before, I was worried about the future. Now I’m looking forward to peace and finally sleeping more soundly.”

At Habitat Clallam, we’ve always believed that building a better community means more than pouring foundations and raising walls. It means listening deeply. Responding creatively. And walking alongside people—not just during the key ceremony, but every step of the way.

Because when we say Habitat is “more than just homes,” we mean it. We’re building health. We’re building dignity. We’re building opportunity. And with the continued partnership of our neighbors, we’ll keep building hope—one person, one family, one story at a time.

How We Fund This Work

At Habitat Clallam, every wall we raise and every repair we complete begins with a shared belief—but it’s sustained by shared investment. Building affordable homes and preserving existing ones takes more than hammers and heart. It takes resources. And how we fund this work matters—especially in a time when the public is asking thoughtful questions about where nonprofit dollars come from and how they’re used.

Let’s start with something many people see firsthand: our Habitat Stores in Port Angeles and Sequim (commonly known locally as “ReStores,” although due to trademarks in Washington State, we can't officially use that name). These stores are more than retail outlets—they’re community hubs. They offer deeply discounted furniture, home goods, appliances, and building materials, all donated by generous individuals and businesses. Every purchase supports our mission directly. Store revenue is earned income, covering essential operating expenses like staffing, transportation, and even construction materials. In short, the Stores help make our work sustainable, and every donation or purchase is a small but powerful act of partnership.

But Store sales alone don’t cover the full cost of building or repairing homes. That’s why private donations and corporate partnerships are vital—and why we work hard to honor them with integrity and impact.

One of the most transformative gifts in our affiliate’s history arrived in 2023 when the Frances Lyon estate bequeathed more than $850,000—catalytic funding that allowed us to acquire the Carlsborg property and launch Lyon’s Landing, a 45-home development that will be our largest project to date.

That landmark gift built on earlier momentum. Two years prior, in 2021, philanthropist MacKenzie Scott directed $15 million to Habitat affiliates across Washington; Habitat Clallam’s share—$1 million—supercharged our long-range plan to serve more families. Even before Carlsborg came into view, community partners were investing significantly in our vision. The Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe contributed $50,000 to help purchase land, and the First Fed Community Foundation provided a generous $100,000 grant to support property acquisition in Sequim.

Additionally, numerous local and national partners have contributed critical materials, services, and financial support:

• Interfor Lumber has donated framing lumber for the last 12 Habitat homes.

• Rodda Paint (local) provided 10 gallons of paint for a recent home repair project in Agnew.

• Grocery Outlet consistently “packs the pantry” for every new construction home dedication.

• Sequim VFW Post #4760 donated funds specifically for the roof system of our current Veterans Build.

• James Hardie donated siding materials for the Veterans Build.

• Titan Builders sent three of their crew members over several days to assist with truss installation for the Veterans Build.

• Romero Roofing provided two to three crew members over several days to install roof sheathing on the Veterans Build.

• Angeles Millwork, Hartnagel Building Supply, and Angeles Rentals have been key partners, offering discounts on materials and key support.

Nationally, Habitat for Humanity maintains corporate sponsorship programs known as Gifts in Kind (GIK), resulting in essential donations:

• Whirlpool donates a refrigerator, stove, and microwave hood to every new Habitat home built across the USA.

• Levolor provides free blinds for each new construction home.

• Major corporations like Home Depot, Lowe's, and Sherwin-Williams continue offering essential support through materials and financial assistance.

Still, even with earned income, private contributions, and corporate partnerships, there remains a funding gap—especially as the costs of land, labor, and materials rise. Thus, public grants are crucial elements of our funding strategy, pursued intentionally and managed carefully.

Two significant grants include the Connecting Housing to Infrastructure Program (CHIP) grant and Clallam County Opportunity Funds. These aren’t blank checks; CHIP is reimbursement-based and tied to specific expenses such as utility infrastructure and site development. Both grants are administered by municipalities with clear guidelines, including prevailing wage requirements and competitive bidding rules. These grants amplify community donations and ensure local taxpayer dollars directly address our region's urgent affordable housing needs.

To clearly illustrate funding shifts, here’s a recent snapshot:

• 2023: Primarily private donations (95.75%), including the Lyon estate gift, with no large public grants.

• 2024: Public funding rose to 45%, including $500,000 in Clallam County ARPA funds for new home construction projects, plus additional smaller government grants. Private donations accounted for the remaining 55% (Store income tracked separately as earned income).

• 2025: Habitat Clallam has been slated to receive $800,000 in Clallam County Opportunity Funds. County leaders chose Habitat recognizing how bringing affordable homes directly strengthens workforce stability, neighborhood vitality, and overall community well-being. Additionally, Habitat Clallam secured substantial ARPA funding from both the City of Port Angeles ($500,000) for home repairs within city limits and Clallam County ($500,000) for new home construction at our two major project sites.

  

What these varied sources of funding demonstrate is clear: Habitat’s financial model is diverse, adaptable, and fundamentally community-driven. No single donor, grant, or sale alone sustains us. It takes the collective effort of residents shopping at our stores, monthly supporters, legacy gifts from generous estates, committed local governments, and businesses contributing discounted materials or critical services.

This mosaic of support is what allows us to build with confidence. It ensures families not only receive a strong foundation for today but a lasting opportunity for tomorrow. And it underscores what makes Habitat’s work more than just construction—it makes it a true community partnership.

Why We’re Scaling Up

For much of its history, Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County operated at a small but steady pace—building roughly one home every 12 to 18 months. It was meaningful work, and it changed lives, one family at a time. But in recent years, something became undeniable: the need had outgrown the model.

Clallam County is in the midst of a full-blown housing crisis. According to the latest state data, 1 in 3 Washington households pay more than 30% of their income on housing, and 1 in 7 pay more than half. In our own county, the average rent as of January 2025 hit $2,001 per month—a 7.5% increase from the year before. At the same time, the minimum wage is $16.66/hour, and the living wage for a single adult is over $20/hour. That math doesn’t leave room for stability, let alone savings or homeownership.

In response to this growing crisis, Habitat Clallam made a bold decision: we would scale up our operations—dramatically. With new funding opportunities on the horizon and strong community support behind us, we shifted from a single-home model to a development approach that could meet the moment. It wasn’t just a leap of faith—it was a necessary act of service.

Our first step was securing a promising site: a large parcel at Sequim Avenue and Brownfield Road, where we envisioned building 52 units of affordable housing. We secured a CHIP grant to fund infrastructure development and hosted a groundbreaking in July 2023 with support from local partners, including a generous $50,000 donation from the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe.

But like many major projects, the path forward was not without obstacles.

During the permitting phase, an unexpected wetland classification slowed progress significantly. Despite multiple expert assessments indicating the area had been altered decades ago by nearby highway construction, regulatory agencies upheld its designation. As a result, several housing units had to be removed from the plan, and the project required significant revision.

At the same time, the City of Sequim’s updated building codes introduced new aesthetic and architectural requirements, which increased construction costs beyond original estimates. These delays were not due to secrecy or mismanagement—they were the result of evolving municipal expectations, environmental protections, and the natural complexity of scaling up.

Then, as we reevaluated the site’s viability, a new opportunity emerged.

A private developer approached us with a property in Carlsborg—already permitted and shovel-ready. It was the kind of chance that rarely comes along: a chance to begin building sooner, with fewer regulatory hurdles. And thanks to a generous bequest from Frances Lyon, we had the financial means to act. With careful consideration, the Board voted to move forward, and Lyon’s Landing was born: a planned 45-home community that represents our largest project in history.

Even that momentum came with its own twists. Our initial site prep partner, Jamestown Excavating, had been ready to begin immediately due to schedule openings from the canceled Amazon facility in Port Angeles. We compared their estimate against the developer’s numbers who sold us the property, and the pricing came back very favorably. But once we received news that Habitat Clallam was awarded $800,000 in Opportunity Funds from Clallam County—a tremendous and game-changing gift—our plans had to adjust again. With public funding comes important requirements for bidding processes, prevailing wage, and compliance documentation. That meant pausing work to follow the proper channels.

To date, the revised site plans are still under development, and construction has not yet begun at Lyon’s Landing. But make no mistake: this is progress. It’s a reflection of the complexity that comes with growth, the integrity that drives our decision-making, and the patience required to do things the right way—not just the fast way.

Some have asked why timelines shift. Others have questioned how contracts are awarded or how grant funds are used. These are fair questions—and we welcome them. What we want the community to know is that no decisions are made in the dark. Our Board follows strict conflict-of-interest policies. Our bidding processes are conducted transparently and in compliance with state and federal guidelines. And our goal is not speed—it’s sustainability, affordability, and long-term community benefit.

Scaling up has not been easy. But it’s been necessary. Because if we are serious about building a Clallam County where everyone has a decent place to live, then we have to think bigger—and we have to build smarter. That’s exactly what we’re doing.

Partnership in Action: the Native American Housing Liaison

In every community we serve, we're driven by the core belief that safe, stable housing should be within everyone's reach—and achieving this requires more than construction materials and blueprints. It requires listening, meaningful partnership, and recognizing that access to affordable housing hasn't always been available to all.

That’s why in 2024, when Habitat for Humanity International (HFHI) approached us about a pilot initiative to better understand and engage with Native communities, we said yes without hesitation. The program, funded by a capacity-building grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under Section 4, allowed us to create a new position: the Native American Housing Liaison.

This role is not about setting aside homes based on race—a common misconception. It’s about understanding why, despite Native Americans experiencing some of the highest housing need in the country, fewer than 5 percent of Habitat homes nationwide have gone to Native families. Recent U.S. Census and Federal Reserve data show that Native households have a median income roughly 25–30 percent lower than the national median and the lowest home‑ownership rate of any major racial group—conditions that should, in theory, make them prime candidates for Habitat’s affordable‑mortgage program. Yet that hasn’t happened. Our goal is to explore the cultural, historical, and structural reasons for this gap—and to find ways to bridge it, respectfully and collaboratively, so that Native families can access the same pathway to safe, affordable homeownership that Habitat offers to others.

In Clallam County, where five federally recognized tribes—including the Jamestown S’Klallam, Makah, Lower Elwha Klallam, Quileute, and Hoh—call this land home, the need for that kind of intentional engagement is especially clear. Our affiliate was honored to be chosen to lead this national learning effort—not to speak for Native communities, but to listen to them.

To lead this work, we hired Rick Dickinson, a respected local leader with longstanding relationships across tribal communities, both through his former work at the Center for Inclusive Entrepreneurship and his service on tribal enterprise boards. His task is simple but powerful: to sit down with tribal members, elders, and leaders and ask, “What does safe, affordable housing look like from your perspective, and how can Habitat’s model align with those needs?” The same spirit of listening and reciprocity guides our outreach to every part of the community; in this case, it ensures that our partnership with Native neighbors is built on respect, relevance, and shared goals.

What makes this effort uniquely impactful is that it is funded through a HUD capacity-building grant designed specifically to help organizations like ours grow strategically. Under the grant’s structure, HUD covers 100% of the liaison position's costs in the first year, 50% in the second year, and 33% in the third year. This stepped approach allows us to gradually absorb the cost internally while expanding the impact and value of this position over time. It’s an investment meant to deepen our organizational capabilities, bring further efficiency, and amplify our overall mission—without immediately impacting local donations, Store revenue, or operational funding.

This isn’t just about Clallam County—it’s about shaping how Habitat affiliates across the country approach housing equity with humility and accountability. What we learn here will help inform national best practices in cultural engagement, grant strategy, and inclusive program development. This is the first such liaison role in the nation, and it’s happening here, thanks to the trust of HFHI and the groundwork of a community ready to lead.

We also understand that conversations about equity can sometimes bring up questions or concerns. It’s natural to ask: If you’re focusing on one group, does that mean others are being left out? The answer is no. Equity is not about exclusion—it’s about ensuring opportunity. It’s about identifying where access has historically been limited or overlooked and working to remove those barriers so more people can participate fully. It’s not about giving special treatment—it’s about making sure everyone has a fair shot.

At Habitat Clallam, we will always serve families based on need, stability, and willingness to partner—not race, religion, or background. That will never change. What is changing is our commitment to going deeper: to understanding barriers we may have overlooked, to inviting more people into the conversation, and to building housing models that reflect the full diversity of the communities we call home.

Because housing is about more than shelter. It’s about belonging. And when we build with equity in mind, we aren’t just building homes—we’re building a better future for everyone.

Openness and Trust: How We Operate

Trust is the foundation of any strong community—and, like a good home, it has to be built with care. At Habitat Clallam, we take that responsibility seriously. We know that when people invest their time, donations, or even just their attention in our mission, they deserve to understand how decisions are made, who is involved, and how resources are used.

That’s why we prioritize thorough, proactive communication and openness about how we operate—not just to satisfy curiosity, but because clear, honest communication is central to our values.

First, it’s important to understand that Habitat Clallam is governed by a volunteer Board of Directors, all of whom live, work, and give right here in Clallam County. The Board is responsible for strategic direction, major financial oversight, and ensuring that our affiliate remains aligned with the mission and values of Habitat for Humanity International. Board members do not handle day-to-day operations, hire contractors, or direct staff activity. Those responsibilities lie with our professional staff team, led by a Chief Executive Officer, who carries out the Board’s vision with the support of skilled administrators, project managers, and service coordinators.

This separation is intentional—it allows for checks and balances and ensures that decisions are made with both community input and operational expertise. It also protects against undue influence, whether from donors, vendors, or any single individual. For example, while we are deeply grateful to the local businesses and private citizens who donate generously to our work, these donations have no bearing on decisions such as contractor selection, land purchases, or project design. Every decision follows clear protocols rooted in fairness, accountability, and compliance.

We also recognize that some information takes time to share, especially when we’re working with public funding, legal contracts, or land use planning. There are moments when we must wait—sometimes months—while engineers revise plans, municipal partners review permit applications, or legal teams finalize documents. During these phases, it may appear that information is being withheld, when in truth, it simply isn’t ready to be shared responsibly.

That’s not secrecy—it’s stewardship.

We hold ourselves to high ethical and legal standards. Whether we’re applying for government grants, managing a large estate gift, or selecting a construction partner, we are bound by a mix of federal guidelines, state procurement laws, donor restrictions, and internal policies. Rushing communication before all the facts are confirmed can lead to misunderstandings—or worse, decisions made without the full picture.

Still, our goal is always to return to clarity. We maintain open financial records, provide annual reports, and regularly update the public through newsletters, media outreach, community events, and conversations like this one. Our books are audited. Our board meetings are structured. And our staff is always ready to answer questions, whether they come from long-time supporters or new neighbors just learning about our work.

To be clear: we welcome scrutiny. We believe in accountability. And we appreciate that people care enough to ask hard questions. What we ask in return is trust—not blind trust, but informed trust, rooted in a shared desire to serve families in need and strengthen our community through affordable homeownership.

Open communication isn’t just a single moment—it’s an ongoing commitment. And we embrace that commitment, even when it’s challenging, because we understand that trust isn’t just given. It’s built—like the homes we raise—one board, one nail, one conversation at a time.

Correcting Common Misunderstandings (Without Pointing Fingers)

In every growing organization—especially one as visible and community-driven as Habitat for Humanity—there are bound to be questions. And sometimes, there are misunderstandings.

Lately, we’ve heard some of those circulating in our community. Some are rooted in honest confusion. Others come from deeper concerns about how nonprofits operate. But however they arise, we want to take a moment to clear the air—not to defend ourselves, and certainly not to call out anyone—but to share facts, context, and clarity, so our community has the full picture.

Let’s start with one of the most persistent myths, mentioned earlier: Habitat homes are not given away. As previously mentioned, every family that becomes a Habitat homeowner goes through a rigorous qualification process. They must meet income and residency requirements, pass financial reviews, and commit to hundreds of hours of “sweat equity”—time spent working on construction sites, attending classes, and helping other Habitat families. When the home is ready, they purchase it at fair market value, with an affordable mortgage they can sustain. The very definition of a hand-up.

Another recent concern has been about how we select the contractors we work with. Let us be clear: no contractor has been selected inappropriately. All of our construction partnerships, especially those funded by public grants, are required to follow competitive bidding procedures and prevailing wage laws. In several cases—such as with our Carlsborg project—we paused work specifically to ensure we were in full compliance with those requirements, even if that meant delaying construction. That decision wasn’t easy, but it was the right thing to do. It’s how we honor both public trust and our own ethical standards.

We’ve also heard speculation about the use of public grant dollars—specifically, whether those funds have been misused. The answer is no. Public grants like the CHIP (Connecting Housing to Infrastructure Program) and the Clallam County Opportunity Funds come with very strict rules. They are typically reimbursement-based, meaning no funds are released unless we’ve submitted detailed receipts, invoices, and documentation. In some cases, the funds are held and spent directly by a local municipality on our behalf. There are no shortcuts. Every dollar is accounted for, audited, and reviewed.

Still, we acknowledge that the past year has brought challenges—particularly as we’ve shifted from building one home at a time to developing entire communities like Lyon’s Landing. That kind of growth stretches systems. It introduces new layers of legal, financial, and logistical complexity. We haven’t done everything perfectly, but we are learning, adjusting, and investing in the right tools and people to ensure that we continue to uphold the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community trust.

We also understand that when timelines shift or when decisions change—like the pivot from our original Sequim site to the Carlsborg property—it can look, from the outside, like something went wrong. In reality, it’s a reflection of how fluid and high-stakes affordable housing development can be, especially in rural areas with complicated zoning, infrastructure gaps, and rising costs. When unexpected barriers arise, we regroup and respond—not reactively, but responsibly. And we bring in partners, consultants, and community voices to help us navigate those choices with care.

The bottom line is this: We are not above scrutiny. We welcome it. It keeps us sharp and accountable. But we hope our neighbors know that every decision we make is guided by mission, not ego—and that behind every policy or pivot is a group of people doing their very best to serve others with integrity.

We are proud of the work we’ve done. And we’re even more committed to doing it better, together.

Why This Matters: The Transformational Power of Homeownership

At the heart of everything we do at Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County is a simple but profound belief: home changes everything. Not just the shape of someone’s roof or the number of bedrooms they can count—but the shape of their future, and the foundation they can build a life upon.

We’ve seen this firsthand, time and again. When a family walks through the door of their Habitat home for the first time, it’s more than a hand-off of keys—it’s a moment of transformation. And the ripple effects reach far beyond those four walls.

Homeownership builds generational wealth. For many low-income families, it’s their first opportunity to own an asset that grows in value over time—something they can build upon, borrow against, or pass on to their children. It creates stability in housing costs, protecting families from rising rents and giving them the ability to plan, save, and invest in their futures.

And it’s not just economic impact we’re talking about—it’s health and well-being, too. Children raised in stable homes experience fewer school disruptions, higher graduation rates, and improved mental and physical health. Seniors and veterans with safe, accessible housing are better able to maintain their independence. Parents sleep more soundly, knowing their families are safe.

Communication and Development Director Julie captured it best when she outlined 10 key ways that homeownership transforms lives:

1. Builds generational wealth

2. Stabilizes monthly housing costs

3. Boosts educational outcomes for children

4. Improves mental and physical health

5. Strengthens community engagement

6. Allows for personalization and control

7. Creates a buffer against financial shocks

8. Reduces housing instability and risk of homelessness

9. Opens the door to intergenerational opportunities

10. Breaks the cycle of poverty

These aren’t abstract concepts. They’re echoed in the stories of Habitat families right here in Clallam County. We hear it in the voice of Melissa, who calls her Habitat home a testament to how community support can drastically improve someone’s life. We see it in Steve, who says simply, “Having a place we can truly call home means the world to us.” We see it in children who now have a desk to do their homework and a quiet room to imagine what comes next.

That’s why this work matters—not just to the families we serve, but to our entire region. Because affordable housing is not a charitable gesture—it’s a smart, sustainable investment in the health, resilience, and economic vitality of our community. When more people can live where they work, we strengthen our schools, our workforce, our neighborhoods, and our local economy.

This isn’t just about homes. It’s about unlocking human potential.

So yes—at times this work is complex. It’s slow. It requires difficult decisions, and it invites public conversation. But we believe in it deeply. Because at the end of the day, we’re not just building houses—we’re building futures. And when we build those futures together, brick by brick, hope by hope, we create something no one can take away: a stronger, more connected, more compassionate Clallam County for all.

How You Can Be Part of the Solution

When faced with something as big and complicated as a housing crisis, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed—or even helpless. But at Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, we’ve learned something important over the years: every single person can make a difference. And together, we can make a profound one.

You don’t have to swing a hammer to build hope—though we’re always grateful when you do. There are many ways to get involved and be part of the solution:

• Donate. Whether it’s a one-time gift, a monthly contribution, or a legacy bequest, every dollar goes directly toward building homes, repairing unsafe housing, and serving families in need. In 2023 alone, more than 95% of our non-store funding came from private donors—people just like you who believe that affordable housing shouldn’t be out of reach for anyone.

• Volunteer. From construction sites to “ReStore” floors, our volunteers are the lifeblood of our work. You don’t need special skills—just a willingness to show up, dig in, and lift others up. Every hour volunteered helps reduce costs, speed up timelines, and build the kind of community we all want to live in.

• Advocate. Use your voice to support policies that expand access to affordable housing. Join us for “Habitat on the Hill,” write letters to your representatives, or simply share our mission with others. The more people who understand the impact of safe, stable housing, the more progress we can make together.

• Shop or donate at our Stores. Every time you purchase an item—or donate gently used furniture, appliances, or building supplies—you’re supporting our mission and keeping useful goods out of the landfill. It’s sustainability with a purpose.

If you’ve had questions or skepticism about how Habitat operates, we understand. We’ve done our best in these pages to answer openly, honestly, and with respect. But the truth is, the most powerful way to understand this work is to step into it. Meet the families. Visit a job site. Spend a Saturday helping stock shelves or sort donations. You’ll see firsthand what this mission looks like in action—and how every piece of it depends on people like you.

Because at its core, Habitat isn’t just an organization—it’s a movement. A movement for housing, hope, and dignity. A movement that says everyone, no matter their income or background, deserves a place to call home. And a movement that only works when we build it together.

So whether you're picking up a paintbrush, making a gift, lending your voice, or spreading the word—we invite you to join us. Let’s turn compassion into action, questions into connection, and concern into commitment.

Let’s keep building—not just homes, but a stronger Clallam County for all.

Conclusion: Beyond the Headlines

If you’ve made it this far, thank you.

Thank you for being curious. For caring enough to read deeply. For pausing to look beyond headlines, social media noise, and secondhand stories to better understand who we are, what we do, and why we do it.

Because at Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, we are more than a nonprofit. We are a community of neighbors, volunteers, donors, families, and advocates bound together by a shared belief: that everyone deserves a decent place to live. It’s a mission rooted not in politics or popularity, but in people—and the simple truth that shelter is a human need, not a luxury.

Yes, we’ve faced challenges. We’ve navigated change, answered hard questions, and stretched ourselves in ways we never imagined when we built our first home over 30 years ago. But through it all, our mission has not wavered. It has grown.

In this moment, we invite you to come closer—not just as observers, but as partners. Ask questions. Seek facts. Tour a job site. Attend a community build. Visit one of our Stores. Sit down with a Habitat homeowner and hear what homeownership has meant to them in their own words. This work is not behind closed doors—it’s out in the open, just like the walls we raise together.

We don’t claim to have all the answers. But we are committed to finding them—with integrity, openness, and humility. We’re listening. We’re learning. And we’re building—not just houses, but bridges—between doubt and understanding, need and opportunity, challenge and hope.

And in the end, what we believe is this: Through shelter, we empower. We empower families to create a more stable future. We empower communities to care for their neighbors. We empower donors and volunteers to be part of something that lasts. And we empower each other to believe that solutions are possible—even in the face of complex problems.

There’s a place for you in this work—because this community deserves to be lifted, because our neighbors deserve homes they can afford, and because when we build together with compassion, dignity, and unity, we all rise.

So let’s keep building.

Together.

How you can get involved:

Volunteer
https://www.habitatclallam.org/get-involved/volunteer/

Donate
https://www.habitatclallam.org/support-us/donate/

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.
  

That’s why I’m excited to share an opportunity that could become part of the solution—and I hope you’ll consider joining us tonight at 6:00 PM at the Port Angeles Library to learn more.

We’re exploring a partnership with Nesterly, an innovative homesharing organization that makes it safe and simple for homeowners to rent out a spare room. This approach has already seen success in other communities by helping homeowners earn extra income while providing affordable housing for individuals who need it—such as teachers, healthcare workers, and students.

Nesterly handles all the legwork:
✔️ Background checks
✔️ Income verification
✔️ Reference checks
✔️ Rent collection

All while focusing on compatibility and community-building between hosts and guests.

Tonight’s information session will explain how the program works and what it would take to bring it to Clallam County. If we can generate interest from 50 local homeowners, Nesterly will begin operations here.

If you have a spare room—or are simply curious about creative housing solutions—I encourage you to attend.

Event Details:
📅 Monday, June 3
🕕 6:00 PM
📍 Port Angeles Library (Main Floor)

Click here to see the Facebook Event Page

I know this is short notice, but your engagement could make a real difference. If you can't make it in person but would like more information, feel free to email cchomesharehosts@gmail.com.

Together, we can continue exploring meaningful, people-centered solutions to the challenges Clallam County faces.

Homeshare Flyer

2.68MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

This approach aligns with the mission of Clallam County Solutions: to replace polarization and cynicism with constructive dialogue and shared understanding. By sharing stories of local individuals and organizations making a difference, we aim to inspire others to engage in positive actions.

In a culture saturated with negativity, choosing to focus on goodness is a form of resistance. By witnessing and emulating moral courage, we not only improve our community but also transform ourselves in the process.

Let’s choose what elevates.

This piece draws inspiration from a powerful essay by guest writer Arthur C. Brooks, originally published in The Atlantic. Brooks’ work has informed other reflections on this site as well. You can read the original article here:
The Beauty Moral Courage Creates

The Uplifting Power of Moral Beauty

Imagine those moments when someone's unexpected act of kindness stopped you in your tracks—perhaps it was a neighbor quietly helping another through tough times, a stranger's generous act of compassion, or someone bravely standing up for justice despite the personal cost. These instances, though sometimes fleeting, contain profound emotional power. Author Arthur C Brooks calls this phenomenon "moral beauty"—a remarkable human capacity encompassing charity, kindness, forgiveness, courage, and self-sacrifice.

Witnessing moral beauty triggers a profound response within us, known to psychologists as "moral elevation." It’s the warm, uplifting feeling that often arises in your chest, moving you deeply and compelling you toward a renewed sense of purpose and optimism. As social psychologist Jonathan Haidt describes, moral elevation isn't merely emotional—it is neurologically real, activating specific parts of our brain that influence empathy, inspiration, and our capacity for joy.

As a connoisseur of film, scenes from Rudy, Schindler’s List, Invictus, Les Misérables, and Hacksaw Ridge come to mind.

This emotional uplift isn't momentary; it tends to inspire long-lasting changes in behavior. When we see someone perform an act of moral courage or genuine compassion, it sparks a desire within us to mirror that goodness in our own lives. Whether it’s a quiet act of forgiveness toward someone who has wronged us, volunteering our time to support community initiatives, or simply showing generosity without expecting anything in return, these actions collectively enrich our own lives as well as those around us.

The beauty in moral courage lies not just in its altruism, but in its transformative impact. It encourages us to become better versions of ourselves, fosters deeper connections within our communities, and increases collective happiness and well-being. In times marked by division or despair, highlighting and celebrating moral beauty serves as a vital reminder of our shared humanity and potential for goodness.

Moral Beauty Across Cultures and Traditions

The concept of moral beauty is not new, nor is it exclusive to a single culture or tradition. In fact, it is deeply embedded in many of the world's great spiritual and philosophical teachings. Christianity profoundly captures this idea with the well-known scripture, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Islam emphasizes moral beauty through charity, which is one of its Five Pillars, guiding believers to consistently support and uplift their communities through acts of generosity. Similarly, Hinduism's principle of Dharma directs followers toward honesty, avoiding harm, and practicing generosity as essential aspects of a righteous life.

Arthur C. Brooks underscores that such acts of moral courage resonate across all cultures precisely because they speak to something profoundly universal within us—a shared aspiration toward kindness, altruism, and community well-being. Regardless of our background or belief system, we are collectively moved by actions that exemplify moral beauty, drawing us closer to each other and inspiring us toward better versions of ourselves.

The Extraordinary Impact of Moral Beauty

While all acts of moral beauty are commendable, some resonate with exceptional power—the selfless actions we take for complete strangers or even those we may consider adversaries. Helping someone we know and care for feels natural, but extending compassion, kindness, and generosity toward someone who cannot reciprocate or might not even deserve it, carries a profound emotional impact. Arthur C. Brooks notes, “Such courage and self-sacrifice toward kin can certainly be inspiring, but moral beauty is most striking in acts of goodness toward others with whom one does not have obvious ties.”

Forgiving someone who seems undeserving or extending aid without expecting personal benefit dramatically highlights the selfless heart of moral beauty. These moments contradict our natural instincts toward self-interest, and in doing so, they ignite powerful psychological responses within us. Witnessing such profound generosity and courage can trigger deep, transformative reflections, encouraging us to reconsider our values and prompting meaningful changes in our behavior and outlook toward others.

These extraordinary acts remind us of the boundless potential for goodness within humanity, illuminating a clear pathway toward deeper empathy, community cohesion, and lasting personal fulfillment.

Jean Valjean experiences undeserved forgiveness. A life forever changed. Les Misérables

The Science Behind Moral Elevation

Psychologist Rhett Diessner and his colleagues have extensively studied the phenomenon of moral elevation, confirming its tangible psychological and emotional effects. Their research illustrates that witnessing acts of moral beauty consistently evokes feelings of warmth, uplift, and profound connectedness. These emotions are not superficial; they significantly influence our happiness levels, strengthen our moral intentions, and lead directly to prosocial behaviors—actions that benefit others without expecting anything in return.

Further, selfless actions contribute deeply to our sense of life’s meaning, especially during challenging periods when we might feel insignificant or experience personal loss. In such times, engaging in acts of kindness and altruism provides a powerful counterbalance, restoring our purpose and reaffirming our place in a caring community. This scientific understanding reinforces the transformative potential of moral beauty, showing clearly how it enriches both individual lives and the broader social fabric.

Inviting Moral Beauty into Daily Life

1. Surround Yourself with Moral Models

The company you keep profoundly shapes your emotional and moral environment. Surround yourself with people who exemplify kindness, generosity, and moral integrity. Conversely, limit your interactions with those who frequently engage in negativity, cynicism, or gossip. Choosing positive influences not only uplifts your mood but also encourages you to emulate admirable behaviors and virtues.

2. Make Service a Pastime

Consider replacing passive leisure activities with meaningful acts of volunteerism and community service. Individuals who dedicate their free time to serving others consistently report experiencing greater joy, purpose, and satisfaction in life. Service can become a cherished lifestyle, offering sustained emotional fulfillment and a deepened sense of personal significance.

3. Practice Gratitude

Humans are naturally predisposed toward a negativity bias, often focusing more on threats and problems than on kindness and positive experiences. Practicing daily gratitude can help shift your attention toward moral beauty and the good present in others. Regularly reflecting on things you're grateful for fosters a healthier, more positive mindset and strengthens your awareness of the moral beauty surrounding you.

The Competing Pull of Negativity

Platforms focused on criticism, conflict, and negativity are increasingly pervasive, subtly influencing how we see ourselves and each other. Constant exposure to such content can reinforce divisive thinking, heighten distrust, and foster a community climate filled with suspicion and resentment. This type of content, whether explicitly critical or subtly antagonistic, chips away at our collective optimism and erodes our sensitivity to genuine kindness and generosity.

Similarly, the growing fascination with true crime podcasts, television series, and documentaries reflects society’s broader attraction to darker narratives. These stories, can distort perceptions of reality, amplify fears, and ultimately diminish our ability to recognize and appreciate acts of moral beauty.

Overconsumption of negativity, whether through criticism-focused media or sensationalized crime stories, can leave us feeling anxious, desensitized, or depressed. Actively choosing to seek out and celebrate moral beauty counters this negativity, strengthens emotional resilience, cultivates optimism, and deepens our connections within the community.

Conclusion: Choose What Elevates

You are naturally drawn to moral beauty—nurture that instinct. In a culture increasingly saturated with negativity and conflict, choosing to focus on goodness is a powerful form of resistance. Actively seek out and celebrate acts of moral courage, kindness, and generosity. By witnessing and emulating these actions, you'll not only help make the world a better place—you'll profoundly transform your own life and inspire those around you.

Here in Clallam County, we don’t have to look far to find examples of people who lead with generosity, who serve their neighbors, and who approach hard problems with hope instead of hostility. Clallam County Solutions exists to highlight these people, these efforts, and these mindsets—not to deny our local challenges, but to frame them differently.

Focusing on moral beauty doesn’t mean putting our heads in the sand. It means facing the issues around us from a place of compassion rather than contempt, of gratitude rather than grievance. We believe that our community’s hardest problems deserve our best thinking and our deepest humanity. Let’s keep choosing what elevates—and let’s keep choosing to do it together.

How does this article hit you? I would love it if you would consider sharing a moment that you witnessed Moral Beauty in our community. Please leave it in the comments below, so we can continue to share the things that make our community a special place.

Keep an eye out for our upcoming deep dive into Habitat for Humanity!

Subscribe now

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Whether you’re excited to move forward with renting a room, looking to rent a room locally, or just curious about the program and have questions, we encourage you to attend.

Many of the comments on the original post (Is Home Sharing the Answer to Clallam County's Affordable Housing Crisis?) expressed both interest and some legitimate concerns about this sort of a program. This is a great opportunity to learn more and hopefully address some of the concerns that were shared, chief among them:

1. What are the risks if you enter into a rental agreement with someone who doesn’t work out?

2. How would applicants be screened for safety and compatibility?

3. What protections are there for homeowners?

I’ve shared my own success renting rooms out in my home, and since publishing the article I’ve heard many stories from others who have had success; whether that be financial success, or even long lasting friendships and companionship. To be fair, I’ve also heard some stories (and experienced them myself) when the situation was not a positive one. I don’t advocate anyone do something to put themselves at risk or in danger, and I think we need to be careful. And at the same time I think it’s a worthwhile discussion to have.

I hope you’ll join us at this event!

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Draft Homesharing Flyer (1)

2.68MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Is Home Sharing the Answer to Clallam County’s Affordable Housing Crisis?

by Nancy Stephanz

It will come as no surprise to the readers of this blog that the cost of rental housing has increased so much in the last few years that Clallam County has no affordable housing options for those who work for minimum wage, or for those on fixed incomes of one Social Security check a month. Most people here pay over 40% of their income for housing. This problem is not restricted to Clallam County or to the State of Washington.

But, in an article published by vox.net on Feb. 24, 2025, titled “Why Americans are moving in with strangers twice their age,” there was a stunning statistic: There are 44 million empty bedrooms in the United States. If even 10% of these bedrooms were made available, for a reasonable rent, at least 4 million people would benefit. The “reasonable rent” part is critical to allow those living on the edge of financial disaster to continue to live in dignity by sharing someone else’s home. Services such as lawn care or cooking or cleaning by the renter for the homeowner, the “host” in this scenario, can be negotiated to bring down the dollar rent cost and to make the home sharing more beneficial to both parties.

This is the idea behind home sharing. I first heard about it on the PBS Newshour during the pandemic. A clever young person was matching up graduate students who needed a cheap but safe place to live with elderly homeowners in Boston who had lots of extra room but needed company and a few extra dollars to meet their expenses, so they could continue to age in place in their own homes. This effort has led to the creation of a company called Nesterly. It is now operating in six cities and will soon be operating in Bellingham. Their website, Nesterly.com, explains their process. I think it would do well here because they offer the initial matchmaking service and provide contracts and dispute resolution services and background checks that are mandatory so both parties can feel comfortable with the idea of talking to each other before they have their first interaction. Once they facilitate a “match” they have actual human employees who call and check on all their clients monthly to be sure all is going well. No companies currently offer this kind of matchmaking and support here.

A recent article in the Seattle Times, dated Jan. 26, 2025, called “Creating small families: More women are sharing their homes as they grow older,” reported the following: “About 11 million older adult households spend at least 30% of their income on housing and utilities…The ‘significant housing shortage’ and rising cost of groceries, health care and insurance have made it harder for many older Americans to afford their monthly expenses..” Home sharing helps older adults maintain their independence.

It also gives them company so they won’t feel isolated and lonely.

Most adults who live alone in their own homes also want to continue to age in place in their own homes. Sharing it with another adult can give them practical help with pet care if they go out of town for a vacation, someone to call for help if they fall and break a hip, and just someone to notice if they develop impaired hearing or vision which they may not notice themselves. These conditions, plus loneliness itself, are risk factors for depression and dementia. And of course, there is the very strong possibility that a new friendship will be created by sharing this living space. A win-win for both parties in more than one way.

Affordable housing is needed, and currently in short supply, not just for the elderly, but by students at Peninsula College who came here from out of town. It is needed by the Coast Guard and the National Park employees all of whom have had to pass extensive background checks for their jobs. Home Sharing could help these people, too.

Then, for every apartment that this type of program frees up, more supply on the market means that rental prices for apartments will come down. This means our other workforce participants with families, our police officers, our teachers, our fire fighters, our hospitality workers, etc., will be able to find a place they can afford to rent. Home sharing agreements can help Clallam County open up that supply of apartments.

I will be speaking to various clergy and leaders of other types of social groups in the coming months to enlist their help in recruiting home sharing hosts. They can act as trusted matchmakers between hosts and prospective renters within their organizations. Once we have 50 hosts signed up, Nesterly will be interested in coming to our county. In the meantime, we will use online sites to encourage background checks, and our local dispute resolution center has told me they would be happy to help mediate any disputes that arise between home sharing individuals. I am still looking for an online site for contracts that can be used to spell out each home sharing agreement.

Home sharing can help bridge the gap in the amount of affordable housing available until we can find a creative way to get millions more homes built in this nation, and thousands more built in our state. I am convinced we will eventually do that, but it will not happen this year. Home sharing can help THIS YEAR. Please consider becoming a home host.

On a personal note, I faced some challenging financial times during the Great Recession and ended up renting out two rooms in my home. Not every renter was a perfect fit, but most were truly wonderful—and a couple have become lifelong friends. As with anything, caution and clear communication are essential, and we hope to provide more tools and resources in a future follow-up article to help others explore this option safely and confidently. That said, renting those rooms not only stabilized my finances, it gave a few good people access to safe, affordable housing. For a time, my wife and I rented a room to a Coast Guard member, and it was a mutually beneficial experience. I’ve always believed in win-win solutions, and what Nancy proposes absolutely fits that bill.

-Danny Steiger

Thanks for reading! Be sure to subscribe to be the first to get new articles discussing solutions in our community.

Subscribe now

While you’re here, be sure to check out our previous articles:

Clallam County Solutions: Let's Build Hope Together

Modernizing the City's Permitting Process

How Can We Supercharge Clallam County's Economy

Touchstone of Change: Local Non-profit Tackles Homelessness Head-On

Engaging in Constructive Dialogue: Choosing Connection Over Contempt

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

In today’s article Deputy City Manager Calvin Goings discusses the challenges they faced and how they are taking proactive steps to make a difference. As with so many things, this is not a silver bullet, and it’s perhaps not a perfect system, but I applaud the City’s efforts to improve and make much needed changes. It takes time to turn the ship, but the City has navigated a course to sail toward better outcomes and processes.

- Danny Steiger

Modernizing the City’s Permitting Process:

Our Commitment to Excellent Customer Service and Enhanced Transparency

By Calvin W. Goings, Port Angeles Deputy City Manager

Permitting services are a critical function of local government. These services protect the safety of residents by ensuring projects comply with local building codes, state laws, and other service standards. Permits help to safeguard property values and prevent future complications when selling or financing a property. They also provide accountability, creating a record that future owners and inspectors can rely on to verify that a project was completed safely and legally.

At the City of Port Angeles, permitting services include zoning, plan reviews, permit processing and inspections, with multiple departments working to review and approve hundreds of permits each year. Unfortunately, the permitting system we rely on today has become outdated and cumbersome. Implemented over 20 years ago, it lacks the modern technologies needed to provide efficient service. This makes it difficult for applicants to navigate the process and for staff to deliver the level of service our community expects.

Recognizing the need for change, permitting staff at the City set an ambitious goal: to become the best permitting agency on the North Olympic Peninsula. To achieve this, we launched a comprehensive improvement effort guided by three pillars:

· Provide an excellent customer service experience

· Strengthen community partnerships and connections

· And support a thriving and inclusive Port Angeles

With these pillars in mind, we have begun a multi-phase effort to modernize our permitting system, with the goal of transforming processes to increase efficiency, enhance transparency, and ultimately provide applicants with a more user-friendly experience. Here’s how we’re making it happen.

Identifying Priorities for Change

In mid-2023, the City engaged with local stakeholders to better understand the challenges of our current permitting system. We met with builders and developers, non-profit organizations, realtors, and others in the community to gain a clearer picture of the inefficiencies and learn more about what our customers needed moving forward.

Through these conversations, we confirmed that the permitting system presents four main challenges:

· It lacks coordination across departments

· Reviews can be lengthy, with inconsistent timelines

· The system is outdated and excludes digital processes and reporting mechanisms

· Greater transparency is needed throughout

This feedback helped our team to develop priorities for improvement that directly address the needs of our community.

Establishing a Cross-Departmental Permit Review Team

Following stakeholder outreach, City staff formed cross-departmental team to improve coordination in the permit review process. Known as the Consolidated Application Review Policies and Procedures (CARPP) Team, this group worked to streamline workflows and routing processes, eliminate duplicative efforts, and establish a better way to monitor applications.

Through this effort, the CARPP team developed a system that helps staff to track the progress of all permit applications submitted to the City, making it easier to identify and resolve bottlenecks, and ensure applications move forward more efficiently. This work also laid the foundation for the implementation of new permitting software, which I’ll share more about shortly.

Implementation of Senate Bill 5290

In accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 5290, we made significant updates to the Port Angeles Municipal Code in 2024. SB 5290, passed in Washington state in 2023, requires municipalities to modify their procedures for land use and permitting applications. While this bill does not specifically address building or developmental permits, we took a proactive approach by incorporated these permit types into our amended procedures.

These code updates have established clear timeframes for permit reviews that increase predictability, allowed concurrent reviews to reduce wait times, and consolidated procedures into a more cohesive system to set clearer expectations for customers and staff.

Service Improvements at the City Permit Counter

To further reduce wait times for simple projects, the City launched an over-the-counter permitting program called “Super Tuesdays With Triston” in January 2025. This program allows eligible permit applications, such as HVAC system installation or roof replacement, to be processed and issued on the same day. We’re proud to share that, since the program’s launch, staff have issued nearly 80 over-the-counter permits to members of the community.

In early 2025, we also consolidated Community & Economic Development and Public Works & Utilities permitting teams into a single location. Now, applicants can access the services and support they need in-person at the first floor City Hall Permit Counter, making the process more convenient.

Digitalizing Our Permitting and Licensing System

One of the most significant improvements we are making through the Enterprise Permitting and Licensing (or EPL) Project, which will introduce a fully digital permitting and licensing software system to the community. This project will improve efficiency by automating tasks, reducing errors, and ensuring that applications are properly tracked from start to finish.

Using this new system, applicants will be able to submit applications online and monitor their status in real time. Additionally, the system will provide accountability reports to the City’s Leadership Team, the City Council, Applicants and Citizens, offering greater insights into overall performance.

Staff are currently working with our software provider to not only replace the existing system, but to rebuild existing services to provide a faster and more user-friendly experience. We expect to launch the new system later this year.

Developing Key Performance Indicators

To evaluate the success of these improvements, staff have collaborated with stakeholders to development ten Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that measure the quality and satisfaction of:

· Customer Service

· Transparency

· Permitting Timelines

· Streamline and Automation Efforts

KPIs will be incorporated as part of the EPL Project launch. Once implemented, these metrics will track performance, identify areas for further improvement, and ensure that we continue to meet customer service-related expectations in the future.

Looking Ahead

Ensuring meaningful, long-term improvements to our permitting process is a complex and ongoing effort. As we implement these changes, there will be some temporary service adjustments and delays, but the long-term benefits will be worth it.

We appreciate your patience as we work through these important improvements. Our team is excited for the future, and we look forward to launching a more efficient, customer-centric, and results-oriented permitting system that will serve our community for years to come.

About the Author:

Calvin W. Goings has 30 years of experience in administrative and executive leadership. He has served as Deputy City Manager for the City of Port Angeles since 2023, where he assists and collaborates with the City Manager, leading strategic initiatives and supporting the City’s daily operations.

Calvin also serves Port Angeles as Director of Community Services. Comprised of the Community & Economic Development and Information Technology departments, Community Services focuses on improving services and strengthening partnerships within the community.

Calvin can be reached via email at cgoings@cityofpa.us.

Subscribe now

Enjoy the article? Be sure to check out our previous articles:

How Can We Supercharge Clallam County

Touchstone of Change: Local Non-profit Tackles Homelessness Head-On

Engaging in Constructive Dialogue: Choosing Connection Over Contempt

Clallam County Solutions: Let's Build Hope Together

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

How Can We Supercharge Clallam County’s Economy?

by Colleen McAleer - CEDC Executive Director

When we think of our economy, we can think of our community as if we were a large family. If I pay my son $20 to mow our lawn, our family’s wealth did not increase. We merely circulated the $20 within our family. However, if my son mows my neighbor’s lawn and makes $20 our family just became $20 wealthier. Conversely, if we are always paying our neighbors to mow our lawn, we are sending our money out, our net wealth is decreasing.

Another fundamental concept to understand is what drives our county’s average annual wage and how important that number is for our future growth. When we create new jobs that pay less than our county’s full-time equivalent average, our average goes down. By contrast, if we create new jobs that pay higher than our county’s average wage, the average goes up.

Not rocket science, but those two functions are more critical than most people realize.

An example of a company that would maximize our county’s overall wealth is one that

- gets all of their supplies and equipment within the county
- sells all of their finished products outside the county
- is privately owned and where owners live and spend inside the county, and
- where the employees are paid well over the county’s average wage and the employees receive a strong benefits plan.

The government publishes every county’s average wage through the Quarterly Census of Employment Wages (QCEW). The last full year of data published was for 2023.

Clallam County’s annual wage was $52,503 in 2023 or $25.24 per hour. Businesses look at this number and its trend over the years to determine if they want to enter a community. If that number has trended up, compared to other areas, then the business knows the county’s economy is expanding and growing, allowing room for them to profitably enter that economy. If the number is relatively flat, then they look at other locations to expand or locate.

Of course, there are many other indicators companies consider, but by and large retailers and housing developers use this metric as a primary driver along with population.

One common measure used for area income can be confusing or lead to false conclusions about our economy. Our County’s average wage is different from Area Median Household Income also referred to as “AMI”. Area Median Household Income is published by Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This figure is based on the number of people in a household. You would think a household of one person would equal the average annual wage, but it does not. The AMI for one person in 2023 was $58,500 or 11.4% higher in Clallam County than the average annual wage. Why is that? Because we have a lot of one-person households that are retired that are receiving retirement savings, social security and pensions that are more than the average annual wage, so they pull that number up. In 2024 the AMI for a one-person household jumped to $64,300 but the average annual wage is nowhere near that pay.

What we really need to focus on is our working population’s average wages and those private sector businesses that can pay above-average wages. We know that to afford rent and just get by today you need to make $28 per hour plus benefits, which we call a prosperity wage. That’s our target. That’s the path to improving the wealth in Clallam County. Those sectors that pay enough to increase our region’s average annual wage for people without a specialized degree are construction, maritime, and forest products.

If we successfully focus on growing existing businesses and attracting high-wage private businesses, then the retail, service and multifamily housing sectors that generate a lot of local sales taxes and housing will follow.

As an example, hotels chains look specifically at occupancy rates Monday-Thursday nights when considering expansion into new communities. Hotel chains know they can fill their rooms on weekends with tourists. They rely on weekday overnight stays from business activity to ensure their revenues meet their targets.

Multifamily developers look at median income rates to see if tenants could generally afford their rents and they look at trends to ensure they will be able to increase their rents. Retailers do the same thing when they decide where to locate when looking to expand.

The retail, service and tourism sectors generally pay on average a wage lower than the QCEW Average Annual Wage for Clallam County due to limited hours, seasonality and lack of benefits. As an example, when a Walmart enters a community initially there are an additional 200-300 new jobs, and the municipality receives a large amount of sales tax from the construction of the store. However, according to a UC Irvine study, that Walmart store opening leads to a 2.7% reduction in retail employment in the community and over a 20-year period the economic output of the community drops by $13 million. In addition, Walmart employees receive $6.2 billion annually in public assistance (food stamps, Medicaid, subsidized housing, etc.) according to a study by the Americans for Tax Fairness study, yet Walmart’s annual gross profit in 2024 was $158 billion, a 7% annual increase. Where did those profits from the two Walmart’s in Clallam County go? They did not stay in Clallam County. This is an example of Net Negative Wealth Impact.

Every job is important to every person and family. My intent is not to demonize Walmart. They provide goods at very reasonable prices to consumers. But if we want to improve our economy, we need to target high-wage businesses, knowing that growth in service jobs will follow, but without dragging down our economy.

We must focus on businesses that provide a Net Positive Wealth Impact to Clallam County.

Our beautiful environment has spurred our steady but slow population growth due to in-migration of primarily retirees. While retirees do bring their wealth and spending, they don’t raise our average wage or provide sustainable economic growth. We must find higher-paying wages for our existing workforce and graduating students.

What is Clallam EDC doing to improve Net Positive Wealth in Clallam County?

We know our economy was largely built over the decades on the forest products sector. We have created a Natural Resources Innovation Center that supports our highest private average annual wage sector – forest products. These companies create jobs that meet all the criteria to maximize local Net Positive Wealth. We are helping to reframe the thinking of the industry by accelerating the development of natural resource businesses and jobs that pay a prosperity wage. We are currently doing this through the Clallam Forest Product Innovation Program, a $5.2 million program comprised of 12 closely related projects that offer job growth through innovation and sustainability. We are convening industry members to replace old, restrictive narratives with a new context that leverages innovations and stronger collaboration. We are asking our industry leaders “are we focused upon the future context or the past? What are the trends, where are we going, and are potential partners collaborating?”

We at Clallam EDC support the expansion of amenities and services in our community, and the jobs that come with them. But these jobs should not form the core of our economic strategy, which would further endanger our average wages and send the wrong signal to businesses considering expansion here. Instead, let’s focus on those higher wage opportunities, which will in turn drive expansion in our service economy, benefiting workers at all levels.

In partnership with Peninsula College and EDC Team Jefferson, we are hosting a public Economic Futuring Event on June 4^th to discuss these issues and collaborate with business leaders and elected officials to work in concert to change our trajectory. This will be a public meeting, and all are welcome to attend. Contact info@clallam.org and we will email you a link to register for the 4-hour event.

Note of disclosure: Danny Steiger is the sitting Board President for the Natural Resources Innovation Center.

Did you enjoy this read? Be sure to check out our other articles!

Clallam County Solutions: Let's Build Hope Together
Engaging in Constructive Dialogue: Choosing Connection Over Contempt
Touchstone of Change: Local Non-profit Tackles Homelessness Head-On

Subscribe now

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

The Challenge: Balancing Compassion and Community Needs

Port Angeles has seen a noticeable increase in homelessness over recent years. With this has come encampments, litter, and safety concerns—factors that deeply impact community pride and the quality of public spaces residents hold dear. Joe DeScala, founder of 4PA, first recognized this shift in 2017 while jogging local trails and parks. Troubled by what he saw and committed to community well-being, Joe knew that something needed to change.

The challenge wasn't just the visible effects of homelessness—it was also about the human element. People experiencing homelessness often grapple with complex issues such as mental health, addiction, and isolation. Recognizing this, Joe sought a balanced solution, combining compassion with accountability, aimed at benefiting both the unhoused and the broader community.

The Beginning: An Idea Born from Local Observations

In 2019, after extensive conversations with city officials, law enforcement, social services, and volunteers, it became clear to DeScala that resources were stretched thin and vital pieces of the puzzle were being overlooked. Port Angeles needed a strategic approach with fresh solutions rather than reactive measures.

Thus, 4PA was born in 2021. Its mission was clear from the outset: a clean and safe community for all. Their small grassroots group laid out a plan to accomplish this by cleaning and maintaining public spaces, providing structured temporary housing, and equipping individuals with skills necessary for long-term self-sufficiency. The heart of this organization rests in its belief that the community and those experiencing homelessness must grow together toward a healthier future.

Turning Vision into Action: The Touchstone Campus

At the center of 4PA’s efforts is the ambitious Touchstone Campus, envisioned as a bridge between homelessness and permanent independence. 4PA purchased the property located at 230 E First Street less than two years after their start due to a groundswell of community support. The Touchstone Campus repurposes a historic building, originally Lannoye Motors built in 1945, and will serve as 4PA’s “all-in-one” operations center with the aim to meet several community needs.

The development of the Touchstone Campus is structured in deliberate phases:

• Phase One: Establishing Cleanup Operations
  Initially focused on forming a cleanup crew and acquiring essential equipment, this phase continues to restore public spaces and built community trust. To date over 300,000 pounds of waste have been removed, creating immediate positive impacts. All cleanups use humane practices, never removing personal belongings from people living outside and connecting individuals with existing social services.

• Phase Two: Building the Temporary Shelters
  This phase, currently underway, includes constructing of eleven temporary shelters equipped with heat, electricity, and security, providing stability and dignity for residents. Each tiny home costs approximately $30,000, funded entirely through community donations, business partnerships, and grants like the $25,000 contribution from the First Fed Foundation.

• Phase Three: Common Facilities and Job Training
  The campus will feature shared community spaces with showers, laundry, a kitchen, and retail or manufacturing businesses to provide residents with vital job skills. Partnerships with local businesses like Angeles Millwork and Hartnagel Building Supply have already significantly reduced construction costs through donated or discounted materials.

• Future Phases: Expanding Services and Long-Term Housing
  Future expansions will include renovating additional retail spaces for on-site job opportunities for residents, plus additional spaces for community use. In addition, discussions have already started about developing off-site housing to transition residents to permanent independence.

  

Community and Business Perspectives

The Touchstone Campus has garnered wide-ranging support across the community. Local businesses recognize its potential to revitalize the area and address homelessness comprehensively. 4PA has received support from many local groups, including Swains, Naval Elks Lodge, and several others who support their vision.

While city officials have yet to publicly comment extensively, the project's alignment with community safety and revitalization goals strongly suggests future collaboration. On social media, residents regularly express enthusiasm and appreciation, reflecting strong local support.

Stories of Hope: Meet Dan

Dan's story epitomizes the transformative impact of 4PA's initiatives. Initially experiencing homelessness, Dan found purpose and pride as a crew lead overseeing cleanups around Port Angeles. His dedication and leadership have been integral to 4PA's operations. Soon, Dan will become the first resident—and on-site manager—of the Touchstone Campus, symbolizing the organization's commitment to empowering individuals toward self-sufficiency.

Anticipated Impact

The Touchstone Campus promises significant, multifaceted contributions to Port Angeles:

• Enhanced Public Spaces: The reduction of unauthorized encampments and cleaner public areas contribute to a safer and more inviting community environment.

• Empowerment Through Employment: By offering practical job training and employment opportunities, 4PA fosters individual self-sufficiency and economic participation.

• Community Revitalization: The comprehensive approach to addressing homelessness and public space maintenance is expected to boost local pride and business confidence, leading to broader economic and social revitalization.

Funding the Vision

Community donations remain central to 4PA’s funding strategy, maintaining the organization’s flexibility and responsiveness to local needs. Additional grant funding and revenue from on-site businesses are planned to sustain long-term operations.

Founder Joe DeScala summarizes it best: “I’m doing this for our entire community. It’s about restoring pride, treating people like I’d like to be treated, and creating a safe, thriving environment for everyone.”

Conclusion: Solutions in Action, Inspiring Hope

From identifying urgent community needs to mobilizing resources and developing strategic solutions, 4PA exemplifies effective, local problem-solving. Despite inevitable challenges, such as securing sufficient funding and navigating the complexities of homelessness, 4PA has maintained resilience through unwavering community support. By bringing together residents, businesses, and civic organizations, they've fostered a sense of collective responsibility and optimism.

The story of 4PA and the Touchstone Campus is a testament to what a committed community can accomplish when it unites around shared goals. Port Angeles is not merely witnessing a solution in progress—it is participating actively in its creation. The ongoing efforts of 4PA highlight the profound potential within every community to create meaningful change.

Get Involved: How You Can Make a Real Difference with 4PA

Every community thrives when its members step forward with generosity and compassion. Port Angeles has a powerful opportunity to support the transformative work of 4PA. Here are some practical, meaningful ways you can help:

1. Financial Contributions and Monthly Giving

One of the most impactful ways to support 4PA's mission is through financial donations. Whether it's a one-time gift or a recurring monthly pledge, your contributions go directly toward building temporary shelters, maintaining clean public spaces, and developing critical community facilities.

https://donorbox.org/4pa-city-cleanup-homeless-support

• Donate Now: Make a one-time or recurring donation.

• Monthly Giving: Regular contributions provide stability for long-term projects. Consider becoming a monthly donor to support sustained progress.

• Checks: “4PA” PO Box 25, Port Angeles, WA 98362

Remember, all donations to 4PA are tax-deductible (EIN# 87-2448613).

2. Volunteering Your Time

Volunteers are the backbone of community-driven change. 4PA warmly welcomes volunteers for cleanup crews, helping to maintain parks, trails, and public spaces around Port Angeles. Volunteering with 4PA is not just about making spaces cleaner—it's about building community pride and connection.

• Volunteer Opportunities: 4PA offers flexible volunteer opportunities suitable for different schedules and physical abilities. You can join existing cleanup routes or even create your own tailored route!

• Getting Started:

  1. Review What to Expect When Volunteering.

  2. Sign the Volunteer Waiver.

  3. Choose your volunteer date and location: Volunteer Sign-Up Page.

Volunteers are provided with essential equipment, such as garbage grabbers, buckets, and safety vests.

3. In-Kind Donations and Business Partnerships

Local businesses play an invaluable role in 4PA’s success through financial sponsorships or donating materials and services. Whether it’s donating construction materials, offering professional services, or supporting fundraising events, your business can make a significant community impact.

• Become a Business Partner: Email info@4pa.org to explore partnership opportunities.

4. Spread the Word

Awareness is crucial. Share 4PA’s stories and achievements within your networks and on social media. By amplifying their message, you help attract volunteers, donors, and wider community support.

• Follow and Share: Stay updated and spread positivity by following 4PA on Facebook.

Together, these actions ensure a stronger, safer, and more hopeful future for Port Angeles. Join 4PA today, and help build a community where everyone has a chance to thrive.

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

In an age of intense polarization, how we choose to engage with one another profoundly affects the health and resilience of our communities. Here in Clallam County—and indeed across our nation—we've seen conversations around difficult issues increasingly marked by suspicion, contempt, and demagoguery. These trends don't just hinder productive dialogue; they erode trust, diminish community participation, and deepen divisions.

However, there's hope. By consciously choosing a different approach—one rooted in respect, curiosity, and empathy—we can transform even the most challenging conversations into opportunities for positive change. This belief is at the heart of our mission at Clallam County Solutions, where constructive dialogue, community engagement, and thoughtful problem-solving are our guiding principles.

The High Cost of Contempt

Author and social scientist Arthur C. Brooks, in his influential book Love Your Enemies, identifies contempt as a central threat to constructive discourse. Contempt is more than simple disagreement or criticism; it's an attitude of dismissiveness and superiority, one that poisons the wells of dialogue and leaves no room for meaningful understanding.

We see this attitude surface too often in community discussions, sometimes masked in ambiguous language, rumors, or unverified allegations. Platforms and conversations built on insinuation, rather than evidence and good faith, can create lasting damage, leading to suspicion, disengagement, and entrenched division.

When individuals or groups repeatedly experience contemptuous communication, their willingness to engage openly and authentically diminishes. This results in a cycle of defensiveness, mistrust, and withdrawal, limiting our collective capacity to address genuine concerns collaboratively.

Choosing Respect and Understanding

Yet, as Brooks emphasizes, the antidote to contempt is not agreement—it is respect and genuine curiosity about differing perspectives. He suggests practical strategies for transforming our dialogues:

• Lead with Humility: Acknowledge openly that none of us hold all the answers. Humility creates space for others to share their perspectives without fear of dismissal or ridicule.

• Seek Common Ground: Even amid stark differences, most community members share fundamental values, such as a desire for safety, fairness, and prosperity. Highlighting shared goals can build bridges rather than walls.

• Engage with Genuine Curiosity: Approach discussions as opportunities to learn rather than battles to win. This shift transforms adversaries into conversational partners and fosters mutual understanding.

These strategies are precisely the type of approach encouraged by Clallam County Solutions, where we strive for respectful, inclusive, and solutions-oriented dialogue around issues facing our community.

Practical Steps for Positive Engagement

Constructive discourse thrives when guided by thoughtful practices:

1. Clarify Facts and Opinions: Clearly distinguishing between verified information and personal interpretation fosters transparency and trust. It encourages honest dialogue based on reality rather than speculation.

2. Source Verification: Responsible engagement involves verifying claims through official documents, credible research, or direct conversations. Fact-checking should become a shared community norm, enabling informed discussions.

3. Encourage Balanced Dialogue: Invite perspectives from all involved parties, especially when contentious issues arise. Fair representation of diverse views supports informed decision-making and collective ownership of solutions.

4. Avoid Personal Attacks: Criticism of ideas or actions, presented respectfully, is healthy. Personal attacks, on the other hand, close doors to dialogue and collaboration. Theodore Roosevelt reminds us it's the person "in the arena" who deserves respect, even amidst disagreement.

Strengthening Clallam County Together

At Clallam County Solutions, we are dedicated to hosting robust, meaningful discussions on important local issues. We believe every community member plays a crucial role in shaping a vibrant, cohesive community through their participation in these conversations. To achieve this, we actively foster the kind of dialogue highlighted by Brooks—one built on humility, curiosity, and respect.

Choosing to "love your enemies" doesn't mean sacrificing your principles. It means advocating passionately yet respectfully; disagreeing strongly yet maintaining genuine empathy for others. By adopting this approach, we ensure our community discussions become avenues for collective progress rather than division.

Let's commit to setting a positive tone for engagement in Clallam County. We invite your thoughtful, respectful participation as we build a stronger community through better conversations that lead to meaningful solutions. Together, we can elevate discourse, bridge divides, and foster a thriving, inclusive community.

A reminder Around Our Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

Every community faces challenges, and ours here in Clallam County is no different. Sometimes these problems can feel overwhelming, fueling frustration, mistrust, or even hopelessness. It's natural to notice what's wrong—but the good news is there's another side to this story. Solutions exist, and they're happening right here, right now, all around us.

As Mr. Rogers famously shared, “When I was a boy and I would see scary things in the news, my mother would say to me, ‘Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping.’” This site, ClallamCountySolutions.com, is dedicated precisely to those helpers, those who see challenges clearly and step forward with innovative, practical, and hopeful ways to address them.

Why Clallam County Solutions?

In today's polarized world, constructive conversation can seem rare. Dialogue often descends into attacks or accusations, clouding the potential for progress and understanding. Clallam County Solutions aims to provide an alternative—a gathering place for genuine, thoughtful, and hopeful conversation. It's a space to learn about positive actions already underway in our community, to engage in honest dialogue, and most importantly, to encourage involvement from all corners of our community.

None of us have all the answers, and no solution is perfect. Yet, when we bring together diverse perspectives respectfully and openly, we can achieve results that uplift everyone involved. This is the heart of our mission: to share what's working, acknowledge what isn't, and collaborate constructively toward a better future.

Community Engagement and Comment Policy

Active dialogue and engagement with our readers is crucial. Writers on this platform are encouraged—and expected—to revisit their articles regularly, responding thoughtfully to readers’ questions and concerns.

We want conversations, not shouting matches. Therefore, comments will be reviewed regularly and are expected to adhere to these foundational guidelines:

• Stay on Topic: Comments must relate directly to the article.

• Respectfulness: Every comment should demonstrate respect toward authors, website management, and fellow commenters. Bullying, name-calling, or disrespectful behaviors will not be tolerated.

• Constructive Dialogue: Political grandstanding is unwelcome here. While some discussions naturally involve political elements, the goal is to enhance understanding, clarify perspectives, and contribute constructively.

• No Personal Attacks: As Theodore Roosevelt wisely said, it's the person who is "actually in the arena" who deserves our respect. Criticism is welcome, but personal attacks are not.

• Transparency: Any new guidelines needed as this platform evolves will prioritize civility, decency, and productive dialogue.

  

Our Approach and My Commitment

This is not a place for puff pieces or vague complaints. Instead, Clallam County Solutions commits to substance—highlighting candid examinations of our community's issues, sharing innovative ideas, interviewing local change-makers, and following up diligently on impactful stories.

Transparency and openness are fundamental values for me, and I'll strive to exemplify them in every article and interaction. However, due to my roles on various local boards—such as President of the Board for the Natural Resources Innovation Center, Vice President of the Board for Habitat for Humanity, Vice Chair of the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission, Associate Director of North Peninsula Builders Association, Director of the Olympic Workforce Development Council, and Director of the Western Builders Association—there will be times when confidentiality or the premature nature of certain discussions will limit my ability to comment. In these instances, I'll clearly state why I'm unable to share specific details, always with an eye toward eventual openness.

It’s essential to clarify that while these experiences deeply inform my views, Clallam County Solutions is my personal passion project aimed at fostering better communication, trust, and problem-solving in our community. It is not sponsored by, nor do I represent or speak on behalf of any of these organizations in an official capacity through this platform.

Ultimately, I aim to uphold the highest standards of ethics, integrity, and openness possible—engaging respectfully, honestly, and reflectively. By distinguishing personal views clearly from any official affiliations, I hope to maintain transparency and build trust as we work together toward a thriving Clallam County.

Hope and Human Connection

Ultimately, this platform aims to bring out the best in all of us—kindness, honesty, humility, integrity, cooperation, and respect. By elevating solution-oriented conversations, we can reinforce the connections that make Clallam County special. Let's remember, even in disagreement, our collective well-being depends on cooperation and mutual understanding.

I invite you to join this journey. Read, comment, question, engage, and become part of the solutions shaping our shared future.

If you'd like to submit an article, suggest a topic, or engage further, please reach out to me directly at danny@clallamcountysolutions.com. Your participation is warmly welcomed and greatly valued!

Together, let's build a Clallam County that thrives.