Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kurt nicpon's avatar

While I like the idea of a modernized system, and appreciate the acceptance of some of the problems in permitting….After speaking to people that work in several departments involved in the permit approval process, there should be a human that reviews these permits first to determine which other departments need to review said plans to possibly avoid something simple needing to be looked at by departments that it doesn’t involve….this would streamline it so smaller things didn’t need to follow larger more complex permits to all departments.

Expand full comment
Steven Pelayo's avatar

I wholeheartedly agree. Senate Bill 5290 is forcing all municipalities to become more efficient. The City also set out KPIs in 2017 for measuring progress in permitting, but never followed up on it. Is the SB 5290 timeline requirement of 65 days for a permit that doesn't require public notice (and 100 days for those requiring notice) really happening? I pray the City starts a real-time "dashboard" with all of the new KPIs constantly updated. At a minimum, City Council should commit to share quarterly updates on our progress.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts