Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steven Pelayo's avatar

I agree with the article’s focus on innovative housing solutions like home-sharing to address Clallam County’s housing crisis. In my twenties, I relied on roommates to afford rent, and I see similar trends emerging: multi-generational households, later-in-life roommates, dual-income households, and more single-room rentals. Port Angeles (PA) underutilizes its housing stock—think snowbirds leaving homes empty for 6-8 months, retired couples in oversized 3-4 bedroom homes, or the 200+ vacant, blighted properties noted in the latest Housing Action Plan. The lack of apartment construction for over a decade hasn’t helped.

I commend the City Council for waiving permit fees for ADUs, mobile homes, and multi-family units like duplexes and apartments. These steps encourage affordable housing. However, I’m concerned that skyrocketing fees, combined with stricter regulations and rising construction costs, have crippled the single-family housing market. Single-family building permits dropped 50% annually over the last two years, with only 12 issued in 2024. Meanwhile, Sequim and Carlsborg are adding 900 homes, highlighting PA’s lag.

Focusing heavily on ADUs and low-income (30-80% AMI) housing risks creating an imbalance. PA needs all types of housing—single-family, multi-family, and affordable options—plus better use of existing stock to ensure a vibrant future.

Expand full comment
MK's avatar

I've had this idea in my head, and it might not be attainable, but what if the county found a way to balance the cost of rental partially funded by an exemption of property taxes? Let's say going rate for a room of XX size is 500/mo. Homeowner is paying $500/mo in property taxes. Figure out the percentage of the monthly taxable amount is equal to the proportion of area rented, i.e. 20%. Homeowner gets to knock off $100/mo in property taxes, and the renter gets the place for $400/mo.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts